IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i5p1844-d326723.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Spatial Optimization and Evaluation of the Economic, Ecological, and Social Value of Urban Green Space in Shenzhen

Author

Listed:
  • Yuhan Yu

    (Key Laboratory of Urban Land Resources Monitoring and Simulation, MNR, Shenzhen 518034, China
    Shenzhen Urban Planning and Land Resource Research Center, Shenzhen 518034, China)

  • Wenting Zhang

    (College of Resources and Environment, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Peihong Fu

    (College of Resources and Environment, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Wei Huang

    (College of Resources and Environment, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Keke Li

    (College of Resources and Environment, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Kai Cao

    (School of Information Systems, Singapore Management University, Singapore 178902, Singapore)

Abstract

Urban green space (UGS) is important in urban systems, as it benefits economic development, ecological conservation, and living conditions. Many studies have evaluated the economic, ecological, and social value of UGS worldwide, and spatial optimization for UGS has been carried out to maximize its value. However, few studies have simultaneously examined these three values of UGS in one optimization system. To fill this gap, this study evaluated the economic value of UGS in terms of promoting housing prices, its ecological value through the relief of high land surface temperature (LST), and its social value through the provision of recreation spaces for residents within a 255 m distance. Subsequently, these three values were set as objectives in a genetic algorithm (GA)-based multi-objective optimization (MOP) system. Shenzhen was taken as the case study area. The results showed that the influencing distance of UGS in Shenzhen for house prices was 345 m, and the influencing distance of UGS for LST was 135 m. Using MOP, the Pareto solutions for increasing UGS were identified and presented. The results indicate that MOP can simultaneously optimize UGS’s economic, ecological, and social value.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuhan Yu & Wenting Zhang & Peihong Fu & Wei Huang & Keke Li & Kai Cao, 2020. "The Spatial Optimization and Evaluation of the Economic, Ecological, and Social Value of Urban Green Space in Shenzhen," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-18, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:5:p:1844-:d:326723
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/5/1844/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/5/1844/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhijie Wu & Yixin Zhang, 2018. "Spatial Variation of Urban Thermal Environment and Its Relation to Green Space Patterns: Implication to Sustainable Landscape Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-11, June.
    2. Qian Wang & Zhigao Zhang, 2017. "Examining social inequalities in urban public leisure spaces provision using principal component analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(6), pages 2409-2420, November.
    3. Witte, Ann D & Sumka, Howard J & Erekson, Homer, 1979. "An Estimate of a Structural Hedonic Price Model of the Housing Market: An Application of Rosen's Theory of Implicit Markets," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 47(5), pages 1151-1173, September.
    4. van den Berg, Agnes E. & Maas, Jolanda & Verheij, Robert A. & Groenewegen, Peter P., 2010. "Green space as a buffer between stressful life events and health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(8), pages 1203-1210, April.
    5. Lei Zhao & Xuhui Lee & Ronald B. Smith & Keith Oleson, 2014. "Strong contributions of local background climate to urban heat islands," Nature, Nature, vol. 511(7508), pages 216-219, July.
    6. Xu, Mengya & Xin, Jing & Su, Shiliang & Weng, Min & Cai, Zhongliang, 2017. "Social inequalities of park accessibility in Shenzhen, China: The role of park quality, transport modes, and hierarchical socioeconomic characteristics," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 38-50.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sumarmi Sumarmi & Purwanto Purwanto & Syamsul Bachri, 2021. "Spatial Analysis of Mangrove Forest Management to Reduce Air Temperature and CO 2 Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-14, July.
    2. Gu Jinjin & Lyu Xiaoqian & Fang Buyun & Hui Qiang & Cao Yuan, 2023. "Study on Planning and Design of Blue-Green-Gray Transformation of Lakeside Cities to Deal with the Complex Urban Waterlogging Caused by Extreme Rainstorm," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Raziyeh Teimouri & Sadasivam Karuppannan & Alpana Sivam & Ning Gu & Komali Yenneti, 2023. "Exploring International Perspective on Factors Affecting Urban Socio-Ecological Sustainability by Green Space Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-22, September.
    4. Yue Liu & Hui Li & Chang Li & Cheng Zhong & Xueye Chen, 2021. "An Investigation on Shenzhen Urban Green Space Changes and Their Effect on Local Eco-Environment in Recent Decades," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-18, November.
    5. Weiting Shan & Chunliang Xiu & Rui Ji, 2020. "Creating a Healthy Environment for Elderly People in Urban Public Activity Space," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-18, October.
    6. Kai Cao & Wenwen Li & Richard Church, 2020. "Big data, spatial optimization, and planning," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(6), pages 941-947, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Su, Shiliang & Zhou, Hao & Xu, Mengya & Ru, Hu & Wang, Wen & Weng, Min, 2019. "Auditing street walkability and associated social inequalities for planning implications," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 62-76.
    2. Wang, Qian & Lan, Zili, 2019. "Park green spaces, public health and social inequalities: Understanding the interrelationships for policy implications," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 66-74.
    3. Bing Li & Zhifeng Liu & Ying Nan & Shengnan Li & Yanmin Yang, 2018. "Comparative Analysis of Urban Heat Island Intensities in Chinese, Russian, and DPRK Regions across the Transnational Urban Agglomeration of the Tumen River in Northeast Asia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, July.
    4. Brasington, D. M., 2003. "The supply of public school quality," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 367-377, August.
    5. Giuseppina A. Giorgio & Maria Ragosta & Vito Telesca, 2017. "Climate Variability and Industrial-Suburban Heat Environment in a Mediterranean Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-10, May.
    6. David Hidalgo García & Julián Arco Díaz & Adelaida Martín Martín & Emilio Gómez Cobos, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Analysis of Urban Thermal Effects Caused by Heat Waves through Remote Sensing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-24, September.
    7. Joaquín Delgado & Giovanni Wences, 2020. "A hedonic approach to the valuation of the effect of criminal violence on housing prices in Acapulco City," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 59(6), pages 2999-3018, December.
    8. Kay Fretwell & Alison Greig, 2019. "Towards a Better Understanding of the Relationship between Individual’s Self-Reported Connection to Nature, Personal Well-Being and Environmental Awareness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-21, March.
    9. Celia Bilbao-Terol, 2009. "Impacts of an Iron and Steel Plant on Residential Property Values," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(9), pages 1421-1436, September.
    10. Zhang, Congwen & Boyle, Kevin J. & Kuminoff, Nicolai V., 2015. "Partial identification of amenity demand functions," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 180-197.
    11. Shunfeng Song, 1998. "Home buyers' characteristics and selling prices," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 11-14.
    12. Bertram, Christine & Rehdanz, Katrin, 2015. "The role of urban green space for human well-being," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 139-152.
    13. Somajita Paul & Harini Nagendra, 2017. "Factors Influencing Perceptions and Use of Urban Nature: Surveys of Park Visitors in Delhi," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-23, April.
    14. Amit Kumar & Vivek Agarwal & Lalit Pal & Surendra Kumar Chandniha & Vishal Mishra, 2021. "Effect of Land Surface Temperature on Urban Heat Island in Varanasi City, India," J, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-10, August.
    15. Yoshiyasu Koide & Kenji Nishizaki & Nao Sudo, 2022. "Flood Risk Perception and its Impact on Land Prices in Japan," Bank of Japan Working Paper Series 22-E-12, Bank of Japan.
    16. Siqi Lai & Brian Deal, 2022. "Parks, Green Space, and Happiness: A Spatially Specific Sentiment Analysis Using Microblogs in Shanghai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.
    17. Shaojing Jiang, 2023. "Compound Heat Vulnerability in the Record-Breaking Hot Summer of 2022 over the Yangtze River Delta Region," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(8), pages 1-15, April.
    18. Zhicheng Zheng & Haoming Xia & Shrinidhi Ambinakudige & Yaochen Qin & Yang Li & Zhixiang Xie & Lijun Zhang & Haibin Gu, 2019. "Spatial Accessibility to Hospitals Based on Web Mapping API: An Empirical Study in Kaifeng, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-14, February.
    19. William Goetzmann & Liang Peng, 2003. "Estimating Indices in the Presence of Seller Reservation Prices," Yale School of Management Working Papers ysm352, Yale School of Management, revised 01 May 2003.
    20. SangHyeok Lee & Donghyun Kim, 2022. "Multidisciplinary Understanding of the Urban Heating Problem and Mitigation: A Conceptual Framework for Urban Planning," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-15, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:5:p:1844-:d:326723. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.