IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i4p1647-d323942.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Influence of Xenocentrism on Purchase Intentions of the Consumer: The Mediating Role of Product Attitudes

Author

Listed:
  • Luis J. Camacho

    (Division of Business, Department of International Business and Marketing, SUNY Empire State College, 500 Seaview Avenue, Staten Island, NY 10305, USA)

  • Cristian Salazar-Concha

    (Administration Institute, Faculty of Economic and Administrative Sciences, Universidad Austral de Chile, Independencia 631, Valdivia 5110566, Chile)

  • Patricio Ramírez-Correa

    (School of Engineering, Universidad Católica del Norte, Larrondo, Coquimbo 1780000, Chile)

Abstract

Globally, xenocentrism has emerged as a significant concept to understand consumer behavior regarding local and foreign products. In this context and based on a sample of Colombian customers, this investigation aims to analyze both the direct and indirect effects of xenocentrism on the consumer purchase intentions of imported products through product attitudes and perceived product quality. Xenocentrism was measured using the XSCALE, and the research model was analyzed with partial least squares structural equation modeling. The result indicates that xenocentrism has a positive direct effect on purchase intentions, perceived product quality, and product attitudes. The analysis also shows that product attitudes will partially mediate the effect between xenocentrism and purchase intentions. In light of these findings, xenocentrism in Latin America arises as a solid construction to explain consumer behavior, mainly when individuals’ beliefs generate a positive appreciation of the purchase of imported products that compete in local markets. Moreover, these results permit designing sustainable marketing strategies that are more suited to the xenocentrism of Latin American consumers.

Suggested Citation

  • Luis J. Camacho & Cristian Salazar-Concha & Patricio Ramírez-Correa, 2020. "The Influence of Xenocentrism on Purchase Intentions of the Consumer: The Mediating Role of Product Attitudes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-12, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:4:p:1647-:d:323942
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/4/1647/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/4/1647/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Diamantopoulos, Adamantios & Davydova, Olga & Arslanagic-Kalajdzic, Maja, 2019. "Modeling the role of consumer xenocentrism in impacting preferences for domestic and foreign brands: A mediation analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 587-596.
    2. Belk, Russell W, 1988. "Possessions and the Extended Self," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 15(2), pages 139-168, September.
    3. Tu, Lingjiang & Khare, Adwait & Zhang, Yinlong, 2012. "A short 8-item scale for measuring consumers’ local–global identity," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 35-42.
    4. Jorge Arenas-Gaitán & Borja Sanz-Altamira & Patricio E. Ramírez-Correa, 2019. "Complexity of Understanding Consumer Behavior from the Marketing Perspective," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-3, January.
    5. Jean-Noël Kapferer & Isabelle Schuiling, 2004. "Executive Insights: Real Differences Between Local and International Brands: Strategic Implications for International Marketers," Post-Print hal-00781539, HAL.
    6. Babin, Barry J. & Babin, Laurie, 2001. "Seeking something different? A model of schema typicality, consumer affect, purchase intentions and perceived shopping value," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 89-96, November.
    7. Marie Merle & Gerhard Reese & Stefan Drews, 2019. "#Globalcitizen: An Explorative Twitter Analysis of Global Identity and Sustainability Communication," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-10, June.
    8. Ajitha, S. & Sivakumar, V.J., 2017. "Understanding the effect of personal and social value on attitude and usage behavior of luxury cosmetic brands," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 103-113.
    9. Yasmin Anwar & Noha El-Bassiouny, 2020. "Marketing and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A Review and Research Agenda," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Samuel O. Idowu & René Schmidpeter & Liangrong Zu (ed.), The Future of the UN Sustainable Development Goals, pages 187-207, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luis J. Camacho & Patricio Ramírez-Correa & Cristian Salazar-Concha, 2022. "Xenocentrism and Formal Education: Evaluating Its Impact on the Behavior of Chilean Consumers," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-14, April.
    2. Yu Lim Lee & Minji Jung & Robert Jeyakumar Nathan & Jae-Eun Chung, 2020. "Cross-National Study on the Perception of the Korean Wave and Cultural Hybridity in Indonesia and Malaysia Using Discourse on Social Media," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-33, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Timo Mandler & Fabian Bartsch & C. Min Han, 2021. "Brand credibility and marketplace globalization: The role of perceived brand globalness and localness," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(8), pages 1559-1590, October.
    2. Sichtmann, Christina & Davvetas, Vasileios & Diamantopoulos, Adamantios, 2019. "The relational value of perceived brand globalness and localness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 597-613.
    3. Timo Mandler & Fabian Bartsch & C. Min Han, 0. "Brand credibility and marketplace globalization: The role of perceived brand globalness and localness," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 0, pages 1-32.
    4. Liang, Xiaoning & Qi, Chenyue & Zhang, Chun & Li, Yaoqi, 2024. "Psychological ownership and users’ continuous usage of domestic vs. foreign mobile payment apps: A comparison between China and the U.S," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    5. Aysel Kurnaz, 2017. "Examination of the Relationship between Luxury Value Perception and Shopping Motivations: Turkey Sample," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(5), pages 108-124, October.
    6. Gineikiene, Justina & Schlegelmilch, Bodo B. & Auruskeviciene, Vilte, 2017. "“Ours” or “theirs”? Psychological ownership and domestic products preferences," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 93-103.
    7. Akram, Muhammad S. & Malhotra, Neeru & Goraya, M. Awais Shakir & Shareef, Mahmud A. & Malik, Aneela & Lal, Banita, 2022. "User engagement on global social networks: Examining the roles of perceived brand globalness, identification and global identity," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    8. Hector Gonzalez-Jimenez, 2017. "The self-concept life cycle and brand perceptions: An interdisciplinary perspective," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 7(1), pages 67-84, June.
    9. Kolbl, Živa & Arslanagic-Kalajdzic, Maja & Diamantopoulos, Adamantios, 2019. "Stereotyping global brands: Is warmth more important than competence?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 614-621.
    10. Kim, Juran & Kang, Seungmook & Bae, Joonheui, 2022. "Human likeness and attachment effect on the perceived interactivity of AI speakers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 797-804.
    11. Shiri Melumad & Michel Tuan Pham & Darren W Dahl & Amna Kirmani & Peter R Darke, 2020. "The Smartphone as a Pacifying Technology [Diagnostic Instruments for Behavioural Addiction: An Overview]," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 47(2), pages 237-255.
    12. Leah Warfield Smith & Randall Lee Rose & Alex R. Zablah & Heath McCullough & Mohammad “Mike” Saljoughian, 2023. "Examining post-purchase consumer responses to product automation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 530-550, May.
    13. Rosenbaum, Mark S. & Ramirez, Germán Contreras & Campbell, Jeffrey & Klaus, Philipp, 2021. "The product is me: Hyper-personalized consumer goods as unconventional luxury," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 446-454.
    14. Huang, Youlin & Qian, Lixian, 2021. "Consumer adoption of electric vehicles in alternative business models," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    15. Smith, Andrew N. & Fischer, Eileen & Yongjian, Chen, 2012. "How Does Brand-related User-generated Content Differ across YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter?," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 102-113.
    16. Luke Butcher & Ian Phau & Min Teah, 2016. "Brand prominence in luxury consumption: Will emotional value adjudicate our longing for status?," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(6), pages 701-715, November.
    17. Jin, Ting & Prentice, Catherine & Shao, Wei, 2021. "Identifying antecedent conditions for luxury brand purchase," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    18. Chen, Zengxiang & Huang, Yunhui, 2016. "Cause-related marketing is not always less favorable than corporate philanthropy: The moderating role of self-construal," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 868-880.
    19. Yadav, Rambalak & Giri, Arunangshu & Chatterjee, Satakshi, 2022. "Understanding the users' motivation and barriers in adopting healthcare apps: A mixed-method approach using behavioral reasoning theory," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    20. Cherrier, Helene & Türe, Meltem, 2020. "Value dynamics in ordinary object disposal," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 221-228.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:4:p:1647-:d:323942. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.