IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i4p1459-d321156.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Relationship Strength under Personalized Recommendation Service

Author

Listed:
  • Wanqiong Tao

    (School of Business Administration, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018, China
    School of Management Engineering and E-business, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018, China)

  • Chunhua Ju

    (School of Business Administration, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018, China)

  • Chonghuan Xu

    (School of Business Administration, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018, China)

Abstract

Relationship of users in an online social network can be applied to promote personalized recommendation services. The measurement of relationship strength between user pairs is crucial to analyze the user relationship, which has been developed by many methods. An issue that has not been fully addressed is that the interaction behavior of individuals subjected to the activity field preference and interactive habits will affect interactive behavior. In this paper, the three-way representation of the activity field is given firstly, the contribution weight of the activity filed preferences is measured based on the interactions in the positive and boundary regions. Then, the interaction strength is calculated, integrating the contribution weight of the activity field preference and interactive habit. Finally, user relationship strength is calculated by fusing the interaction strength, common friend rate and similarity of feature attribute. The experimental results show that the proposed method can effectively improve the accuracy of relationship strength calculation.

Suggested Citation

  • Wanqiong Tao & Chunhua Ju & Chonghuan Xu, 2020. "Research on Relationship Strength under Personalized Recommendation Service," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:4:p:1459-:d:321156
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/4/1459/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/4/1459/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sinan Aral & Dylan Walker, 2014. "Tie Strength, Embeddedness, and Social Influence: A Large-Scale Networked Experiment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(6), pages 1352-1370, June.
    2. Andrew Cron & Liang Zhang & Deepak Agarwal, 2014. "Collaborative filtering for massive multinomial data," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(4), pages 701-715, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mircea Constantin Duică & Nicoleta Valentina Florea & Anișoara Duică & Irina Antoaneta Tănăsescu, 2020. "The Role of E-Skills in Developing Sustainable Organizations and E-Activities in the New Digitized Business World," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-21, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Le & Luo, Xin (Robert) & Li, Han, 2022. "Envy or conformity? An empirical investigation of peer influence on the purchase of non-functional items in mobile free-to-play games," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 308-324.
    2. Bhukya, Ramulu & Paul, Justin, 2023. "Social influence research in consumer behavior: What we learned and what we need to learn? – A hybrid systematic literature review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    3. Matthias Bogaert & Michel Ballings & Dirk Van den Poel, 2018. "Evaluating the importance of different communication types in romantic tie prediction on social media," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 263(1), pages 501-527, April.
    4. Tianshu Sun & Sean J. Taylor, 2020. "Displaying things in common to encourage friendship formation: A large randomized field experiment," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 237-271, September.
    5. Yuho Chung & Yiwei Li & Jianmin Jia, 2021. "Exploring embeddedness, centrality, and social influence on backer behavior: the role of backer networks in crowdfunding," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(5), pages 925-946, September.
    6. Liza Charroin, 2018. "Homophily, peer effects and dishonesty," Post-Print halshs-01993618, HAL.
    7. Liangfei Qiu & Arunima Chhikara & Asoo Vakharia, 2021. "Multidimensional Observational Learning in Social Networks: Theory and Experimental Evidence," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 876-894, September.
    8. Liu, Jian-Guo & Li, Ren-De & Guo, Qiang & Zhang, Yi-Cheng, 2018. "Collective iteration behavior for online social networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 499(C), pages 490-497.
    9. Gandal, Neil & Bar-Gill, Sagit, 2017. "Online Exploration, Content Choice & Echo Chambers: An Experiment," CEPR Discussion Papers 11909, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    10. Dong, Xueyan & Wang, Tienan, 2018. "Social tie formation in Chinese online social commerce: The role of IT affordances," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 49-64.
    11. Yang, Kai & Guo, Qiang & Liu, Jian-Guo, 2018. "Community detection via measuring the strength between nodes for dynamic networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 509(C), pages 256-264.
    12. Ilan Lobel & Evan Sadler, 2016. "Preferences, Homophily, and Social Learning," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(3), pages 564-584, June.
    13. Liza Charroin & Bernard Fortin & Marie Claire Villeval, 2022. "Peer effects, self-selection and dishonesty," Post-Print hal-03712450, HAL.
    14. Xin Liang & Tao Yu & Li Guo, 2017. "Understanding Stakeholders’ Influence on Project Success with a New SNA Method: A Case Study of the Green Retrofit in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-19, October.
    15. Prasanta Bhattacharya & Tuan Q. Phan & Xue Bai & Edoardo M. Airoldi, 2019. "A Coevolution Model of Network Structure and User Behavior: The Case of Content Generation in Online Social Networks," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(1), pages 117-132, March.
    16. Sarah Gelper & Ralf van der Lans & Gerrit van Bruggen, 2021. "Competition for Attention in Online Social Networks: Implications for Seeding Strategies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(2), pages 1026-1047, February.
    17. Kosuke Uetake & Nathan Yang, 2020. "Inspiration from the “Biggest Loser”: Social Interactions in a Weight Loss Program," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(3), pages 487-499, May.
    18. Alex Chin & Dean Eckles & Johan Ugander, 2022. "Evaluating Stochastic Seeding Strategies in Networks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(3), pages 1714-1736, March.
    19. Liza Charroin & Bernard Fortin & Marie Claire Villeval, 2022. "Peer effects, self-selection and dishonesty," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-03712450, HAL.
    20. Li, Ren-De & Liu, Jian-Guo & Guo, Qiang & Zhang, Yi-Cheng, 2018. "Social signature identification of dynamical social networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 508(C), pages 213-222.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:4:p:1459-:d:321156. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.