IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i4p1334-d319605.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decision-Maker-Oriented VS. Collaboration: China’s Public Participation in Environmental Decision-Making

Author

Listed:
  • Lu Feng

    (School of Law, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China)

  • Qimei Wu

    (Judicial Bureau of Tongchuan District, Dazhou 635000, China)

  • Weijun Wu

    (School of Public Affairs and Administration, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China)

  • Wenjie Liao

    (Institute of New Energy and Low-Carbon Technology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China)

Abstract

Public participation in environmental decision-making (EDM) has been broadly discussed. However, few recent studies in English have focused on the participation subject, scope, ways, and procedure in the EDM of developing countries such as China in the worldwide governance transformation. This study aims to provide an overview of public participation in EDM in China, thus elucidating both the legislation and practice of public participation in EDM in China to a broader audience, as such an overview has not yet been provided. At the beginning of this article, we clarify the key definitions of EDM, public participation and the public, and establish an analytical framework for analyzing public participation in EDM in China. We analyze the scope of the public, the participation scope, ways of participating, and participation procedure in EDM in legislation and practice, through document analysis and empirical survey. We then comment on challenges for public participation in EDM in China—including low public participation in EDM, narrow scope of participation, unbalanced ways of participation, and unreasonable participation procedure. In conclusion, we draw wider implications for public participation in EDM in China, arguing for a transformation from a decision-maker-oriented mode to a collaboration mode.

Suggested Citation

  • Lu Feng & Qimei Wu & Weijun Wu & Wenjie Liao, 2020. "Decision-Maker-Oriented VS. Collaboration: China’s Public Participation in Environmental Decision-Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-24, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:4:p:1334-:d:319605
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/4/1334/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/4/1334/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carlos Llopis-Albert & José M. Merigó & Huchang Liao & Yejun Xu & Juan Grima-Olmedo & Carlos Grima-Olmedo, 2018. "Water Policies and Conflict Resolution of Public Participation Decision-Making Processes Using Prioritized Ordered Weighted Averaging (OWA) Operators," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(2), pages 497-510, January.
    2. Henry H. Willis & Michael L. DeKay & M. Granger Morgan & H. Keith Florig & Paul S. Fischbeck, 2004. "Ecological Risk Ranking: Development and Evaluation of a Method for Improving Public Participation in Environmental Decision Making," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(2), pages 363-378, April.
    3. Anne Shepherd & Christi Bowler, 1997. "Beyond the Requirements: Improving Public Participation in EIA," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(6), pages 725-738.
    4. Beierle, Thomas, 1998. "Public Participation in Environmental Decisions: An Evaluation Framework Using Social Goals," RFF Working Paper Series dp-99-06, Resources for the Future.
    5. Pita, Cristina & Pierce, Graham J. & Theodossiou, Ioannis, 2010. "Stakeholders' participation in the fisheries management decision-making process: Fishers' perceptions of participation," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 1093-1102, September.
    6. Jennifer M. P. Stewart & A. John Sinclair, 2007. "Meaningful Public Participation In Environmental Assessment: Perspectives From Canadian Participants, Proponents, And Government," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 9(02), pages 161-183.
    7. Caroline J. Uittenbroek & Heleen L. P. Mees & Dries L. T. Hegger & Peter P. J. Driessen, 2019. "The design of public participation: who participates, when and how? Insights in climate adaptation planning from the Netherlands," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(14), pages 2529-2547, December.
    8. Okubo, Noriko, 2016. "The development of the Japanese legal system for public participation in land use and environmental matters," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 492-500.
    9. De Santo, Elizabeth M., 2016. "Assessing public “participation” in environmental decision-making: Lessons learned from the UK Marine Conservation Zone (MCZ) site selection process," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 91-101.
    10. Ayana, Alemayehu N. & Arts, Bas & Wiersum, K. Freerk, 2018. "How environmental NGOs have influenced decision making in a ‘semi-authoritarian’ state: The case of forest policy in Ethiopia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 313-322.
    11. Beierle, Thomas C., 1998. "Public Participation in Environmental Decisions: An Evaluation Framework Using Social Goals," Discussion Papers 10497, Resources for the Future.
    12. Sándor Kerekes, 2011. "Happiness, environmental protection and market economy," Society and Economy, Akadémiai Kiadó, Hungary, vol. 33(1), pages 5-13, April.
    13. Pius Krütli & Michael Stauffacher & Thomas Flüeler & Roland W. Scholz, 2010. "Functional-dynamic public participation in technological decision-making: site selection processes of nuclear waste repositories," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(7), pages 861-875, October.
    14. Erik Swyngedouw, 2005. "Governance Innovation and the Citizen: The Janus Face of Governance-beyond-the-State," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(11), pages 1991-2006, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Xiuli & Lai, Chenghao & Li, Hengkai & Zhang, Zheyuan, 2023. "A tripartite game analysis of public participation in environmental regulation of ionic rare earth mining areas," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    2. Dong Yan & Paolo Davide Farah & Ivana Gaskova & Carlo Vittorio Giabardo, 2020. "Evaluating China’s Environmental Management and Risks Avoidance Policies and Regulations on Offshore Methane Hydrate Extraction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-15, July.
    3. Aulia Akbar & Johannes Flacke & Javier Martinez & Martin F.A.M. van Maarseveen, 2020. "Spatial Knowledge: A Potential to Enhance Public Participation?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-30, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Johanna Olsson & Lotta Andersson, 2007. "Possibilities and problems with the use of models as a communication tool in water resource management," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 21(1), pages 97-110, January.
    2. Leslie Carnoye & Rita Lopes, 2015. "Participatory Environmental Valuation: A Comparative Analysis of Four Case Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-23, July.
    3. Boley, B. Bynum & Maruyama, Naho & Woosnam, Kyle M., 2015. "Measuring empowerment in an eastern context: Findings from Japan," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 112-122.
    4. Leonardo Chiesi & Giuseppina Forte, 2022. "Design for Climate Change in the Neoliberal Present: Gentrification, Ecocide, and the Loss of Urbanity in New York City," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-25, October.
    5. Sam Erevbenagie Usadolo & Marc Caldwel, 2016. "A Stakeholder Approach to Community Participation in a Rural Development Project," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(1), pages 21582440166, March.
    6. Nuno Videira & Paula Antunes & Rui Santos & Sofia Gamito, 2003. "Participatory Modelling in Environmental Decision-Making: The Ria Formosa Natural Park Case Study," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 5(03), pages 421-447.
    7. S. Franceschini & G. Marletto, 2017. "The dynamics of social capital during public participation: new knowledge from an on-going monitoring," Working Paper CRENoS 201706, Centre for North South Economic Research, University of Cagliari and Sassari, Sardinia.
    8. Asha Rajvanshi, 2003. "Promoting Public Participation for Integrating Sustainability Issues in Environmental Decision-Making: The Indian Experience," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 5(03), pages 295-319.
    9. Jacqueline M. Vadjunec & Nicole M. Colston & Todd D. Fagin & Austin L. Boardman & Brian Birchler, 2022. "Fostering Resilience and Adaptation to Drought in the Southern High Plains: Using Participatory Methods for More Robust Citizen Science," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-23, February.
    10. Axel Marx & Jan Wouters, 2011. "Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation: Conclusions and Implications," Chapters, in: David Vogel & Johan Swinnen (ed.), Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation, chapter 12, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. Langer, Katharina & Decker, Thomas & Menrad, Klaus, 2017. "Public participation in wind energy projects located in Germany: Which form of participation is the key to acceptance?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 63-73.
    12. Charles C. Harris & Dennis R. Becker & Erik A. Nielsen & William J. Mclaughlin, 2014. "Public Deliberation About Salmon Restoration Impacts: Differences In The Input Of Citizens In Different Community Roles," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(04), pages 1-33.
    13. Lia T. Vasconcelos & Flávia Z. Silva & Filipa G. Ferreira & Graça Martinho & Ana Pires & José Carlos Ferreira, 2022. "Collaborative process design for waste management: co-constructing strategies with stakeholders," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(7), pages 9243-9259, July.
    14. Hardev Kaur Latchimanan Singh, 2017. "Evaluating Public Participation Mechanisms in LA21 Programs in Malaysia," GATR Journals gjbssr482, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    15. Carmona, Gema & Varela-Ortega, Consuelo & Bromley, John, 2011. "Participatory Modelling To Support Decision Making In Water Management. A Case Study In The Middle Guadiana Basin, Spain," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 114320, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    16. Garcia, Xavier & Benages-Albert, Marta & Vall-Casas, Pere, 2018. "Landscape conflict assessment based on a mixed methods analysis of qualitative PPGIS data," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 32(PA), pages 112-124.
    17. van den Hove, Sybille, 2000. "Participatory approaches to environmental policy-making: the European Commission Climate Policy Process as a case study," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 457-472, June.
    18. Nordström, Eva-Maria & Eriksson, Ljusk Ola & Öhman, Karin, 2010. "Integrating multiple criteria decision analysis in participatory forest planning: Experience from a case study in northern Sweden," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(8), pages 562-574, October.
    19. Rastegar, Hamidreza, 2009. "Tourism Development and Residents' Attitude: A Case Study of Yazd, Iran," MPRA Paper 25325, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 26 Jan 2010.
    20. Timotijevic, Lada & Raats, Monique Maria, 2007. "Evaluation of two methods of deliberative participation of older people in food-policy development," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(3), pages 302-319, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:4:p:1334-:d:319605. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.