IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i3p850-d312576.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empowering Sustainable Consumption by Giving Back to Consumers the ‘Right to Repair’

Author

Listed:
  • Ricardo J Hernandez

    (DILAB School of Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 8320000 Chile
    School of Design, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 8320000 Chile)

  • Constanza Miranda

    (DILAB School of Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 8320000 Chile)

  • Julian Goñi

    (DILAB School of Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 8320000 Chile)

Abstract

Industry has been considered a major actor regarding the actions and changes needed to achieve sustainable development. Different approximations to the topic have been developed to face the challenges of having a more responsible production of goods and services. These approximations include cleaner production, green design, ecodesign, eco efficiency, design for sustainable behavior, sustainable design, and more recently concepts like circular economies among many more. In all these approaches, the attention has been mainly on the production side while consumption has been tackled indirectly. The majority of laws and ordinances that have motivated the emergence of these approaches have traditionally been oriented to producers. However, an European Union (EU) directive launched in October 2019, called “right to repair”, could change this paradigm, empowering consumers by giving them more possibilities of repairing their products instead of discarding them. This paper presents a preliminary discussion about the effects this directive might have on how we consume products now and how we will consume them in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Ricardo J Hernandez & Constanza Miranda & Julian Goñi, 2020. "Empowering Sustainable Consumption by Giving Back to Consumers the ‘Right to Repair’," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:3:p:850-:d:312576
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/3/850/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/3/850/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ricardo J Hernandez, 2019. "Sustainable Product-Service Systems and Circular Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-11, September.
    2. Ricardo J. Hernández Pardo & Tracy Bhamra & Ran Bhamra, 2012. "Sustainable Product Service Systems in Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs): Opportunities in the Leather Manufacturing Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-18, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Saskia Manshoven & Wim Van Opstal, 2022. "The Carrot or the Stick? Stakeholder Support for Mandatory Regulations towards a Circular Fashion System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-31, November.
    2. Meike Rombach & David L. Dean & Christopher Gan, 2023. "“Soy Boy vs. Holy Cow”—Understanding the Key Factors Determining U.S. Consumers’ Preferences and Commitment to Plant-Based Milk Alternatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-14, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rahman Dwi Wahyudi & Moses Laksono Singgih & Mokh Suef, 2022. "Investigation of Product–Service System Components as Control Points for Value Creation and Development Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-23, December.
    2. Chunting Liu & Guozhu Jia & Jili Kong, 2020. "Requirement-Oriented Engineering Characteristic Identification for a Sustainable Product–Service System: A Multi-Method Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-20, October.
    3. Wunhong Su & Liuzhen Zhang & Chao Ge & Shuai Chen, 2022. "Association between Internal Control and Sustainability: A Literature Review Based on the SOX Act Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-30, August.
    4. Ana Batlles-delaFuente & Luis Jesús Belmonte-Ureña & José Antonio Plaza-Úbeda & Emilio Abad-Segura, 2021. "Sustainable Business Model in the Product-Service System: Analysis of Global Research and Associated EU Legislation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-33, September.
    5. Beatrice Lerma & Doriana Dal Palù & Marco Actis Grande & Claudia De Giorgi, 2017. "Could Black Be the New Gold? Design-Driven Challenges in New Sustainable Luxury Materials for Jewelry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Kai Ding & Pingyu Jiang & Mei Zheng, 2017. "Environmental and economic sustainability-aware resource service scheduling for industrial product service systems," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(6), pages 1303-1316, August.
    7. Sehrish Atif, 2023. "Mapping circular economy principles and servitisation approach in business model canvas: an integrated literature review," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-21, December.
    8. Shaofei Jiang & Di Feng & Chunfu Lu, 2019. "A Sustainable Innovation—Additional Services for Products Based on Personalised Customer Value," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, March.
    9. Shen, Lei & Sun, Wanqin & Parida, Vinit, 2023. "Consolidating digital servitization research: A systematic review, integrative framework, and future research directions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    10. Xianying Li & Feng Xu & Nan Xiang & Yating Wang & Yingkui Zhang, 2019. "Dynamic Optimized Cleaner Production Strategies to Improve Water Environment and Economic Development in Leather Industrial Parks: A Case Study in Xinji, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-18, December.
    11. Li Bai & F. Javier Sendra Garcia & Arunodaya Raj Mishra, 2022. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Adoption of the sustainable circular supply chain under disruptions risk in manufacturing industry using an integrated fuzzy decision-making approach," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 743-759, December.
    12. Garrath T. Wilson & Tracy Bhamra, 2020. "Design for Sustainability: The Need for a New Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-8, April.
    13. Sehrish Atif & Shehzad Ahmed & Muhammad Wasim & Bassam Zeb & Zeeshan Pervez & Lorraine Quinn, 2021. "Towards a Conceptual Development of Industry 4.0, Servitisation, and Circular Economy: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-27, June.
    14. Lukas Alexander Benz, 2022. "Critical Success Factors for Circular Business Model Innovation from the Perspective of the Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, May.
    15. Clegg, Ben & Little, Paul & Govette, Steve & Logue, Joel, 2017. "Transformation of a small-to-medium-sized enterprise to a multi-organisation product-service solution provider," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 81-91.
    16. Lahcen, Bart & Eyckmans, Johan & Rousseau, Sandra & Dams, Yoko & Brusselaers, Jan, 2022. "Modelling the circular economy: Introducing a supply chain equilibrium approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    17. Che-Chuan Hsu & Rua-Huan Tsaih & David C. Yen, 2018. "The Evolving Role of IT Departments in Digital Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, October.
    18. Manavalan Ethirajan & Thanigai Arasu M & Jayakrishna Kandasamy & Vimal K.E.K & Simon Peter Nadeem & Anil Kumar, 2021. "Analysing the risks of adopting circular economy initiatives in manufacturing supply chains," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 204-236, January.
    19. Ricardo J Hernandez, 2019. "Sustainable Product-Service Systems and Circular Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-11, September.
    20. Eungchan Kim & Young Seok Ock & Seung-Jun Shin & Wonchul Seo, 2018. "An Approach to Generating Reference Information for Technology Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-19, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:3:p:850-:d:312576. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.