IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i19p10123-d643830.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Business Model in the Product-Service System: Analysis of Global Research and Associated EU Legislation

Author

Listed:
  • Ana Batlles-delaFuente

    (Department of Economy and Business, University of Almeria, 04120 Almeria, Spain
    Research Centre CIAMBITAL, University of Almeria, 04120 Almeria, Spain)

  • Luis Jesús Belmonte-Ureña

    (Department of Economy and Business, University of Almeria, 04120 Almeria, Spain
    Research Centre CIAMBITAL, University of Almeria, 04120 Almeria, Spain)

  • José Antonio Plaza-Úbeda

    (Department of Economy and Business, University of Almeria, 04120 Almeria, Spain
    Research Centre CIAMBITAL, University of Almeria, 04120 Almeria, Spain)

  • Emilio Abad-Segura

    (Department of Economy and Business, University of Almeria, 04120 Almeria, Spain
    Research Centre CIAMBITAL, University of Almeria, 04120 Almeria, Spain)

Abstract

The business fabric is trying to resolve the many transformations that have occurred in recent decades. Companies are obliged to offer new ways to meet the needs of the market. This situation has led to the creation of new business models that combine both competitiveness and sustainability. Among the most consistent strategies, the product-service system (PSS) stands out. A bibliometric analysis was carried out on 1088 documents during the period 2000–2020, to synthesize the knowledge base on PSS in a global context and analyse future trends. The results obtained have made it possible to identify the evolution of scientific production, the main drivers of this issue, the lines of research developed and their link with EU legislation and reveal some critical gaps in knowledge. The main lines of research describe different aspects of PSS: servitisation, product design, manufacturing, life cycle, circular economy, and sustainable development. This study has identified how its analysis has developed to date and what terms allow us to glimpse new approaches; hence, it is a useful tool for PSS researchers and sponsors who provide financial resources that allow new directions in this research.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana Batlles-delaFuente & Luis Jesús Belmonte-Ureña & José Antonio Plaza-Úbeda & Emilio Abad-Segura, 2021. "Sustainable Business Model in the Product-Service System: Analysis of Global Research and Associated EU Legislation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-33, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:19:p:10123-:d:643830
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/19/10123/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/19/10123/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Julia Paxton, 2019. "Economics training and hyperbolic discounting: training versus selection effects," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(55), pages 5891-5899, November.
    2. Ricardo J Hernandez, 2019. "Sustainable Product-Service Systems and Circular Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-11, September.
    3. Laksana, Kamonkan & Hartman, Joseph C., 2010. "Planning product design refreshes with service contract and competition considerations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(2), pages 189-203, August.
    4. Hakyeon Lee & Hanbin Seo & Youngjung Geum, 2018. "Uncovering the Topic Landscape of Product-Service System Research: from Sustainability to Value Creation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, March.
    5. Emilio Abad-Segura & Francisco Joaquín Cortés-García & Luis J. Belmonte-Ureña, 2019. "The Sustainable Approach to Corporate Social Responsibility: A Global Analysis and Future Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-24, September.
    6. Gunther Eysenbach, 2006. "Citation Advantage of Open Access Articles," Working Papers id:626, eSocialSciences.
    7. Judit Bar-Ilan, 2008. "Which h-index? — A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 74(2), pages 257-271, February.
    8. Anne-Wil Harzing & Satu Alakangas, 2016. "Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 106(2), pages 787-804, February.
    9. Mario Rapaccini & Nicola Saccani & Giuditta Pezzotta & Thomas Burger & Walter Ganz, 2013. "Service development in product-service systems: a maturity model," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(3-4), pages 300-319, February.
    10. Emilio Abad-Segura & Ana Batlles-delaFuente & Mariana-Daniela González-Zamar & Luis Jesús Belmonte-Ureña, 2021. "Implications for Sustainability of the Joint Application of Bioeconomy and Circular Economy: A Worldwide Trend Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-24, June.
    11. de Man, Ard-Pieter & Luvison, Dave, 2019. "Collaborative business models: Aligning and operationalizing alliances," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 62(4), pages 473-482.
    12. Philippe Mongeon & Adèle Paul-Hus, 2016. "The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 106(1), pages 213-228, January.
    13. Ismael Rafols & Alan L. Porter & Loet Leydesdorff, 2010. "Science overlay maps: A new tool for research policy and library management," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(9), pages 1871-1887, September.
    14. Wen-Ta Chiu & Yuh-Shan Ho, 2007. "Bibliometric analysis of tsunami research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 73(1), pages 3-17, October.
    15. Niemimaa, Marko & Järveläinen, Jonna & Heikkilä, Marikka & Heikkilä, Jukka, 2019. "Business continuity of business models: Evaluating the resilience of business models for contingencies," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 208-216.
    16. Marek Szwejczewski & Keith Goffin & Zissis Anagnostopoulos, 2015. "Product service systems, after-sales service and new product development," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(17), pages 5334-5353, September.
    17. Ricarda B. Bouncken & Sascha Kraus & Norat Roig-Tierno, 2021. "Knowledge- and innovation-based business models for future growth: digitalized business models and portfolio considerations," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, January.
    18. Nees Jan Eck & Ludo Waltman, 2010. "Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 84(2), pages 523-538, August.
    19. Costas, Rodrigo & Bordons, María, 2007. "The h-index: Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 1(3), pages 193-203.
    20. Zaifang Zhang & Darao Xu & Egon Ostrosi & Hui Cheng, 2020. "Optimization of the Product–Service System Configuration Based on a Multilayer Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-25, January.
    21. A. Bikfalvi & G. Lay & S. Maloca & B. Waser, 2013. "Servitization and networking: large-scale survey findings on product-related services," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 7(1), pages 61-82, March.
    22. Chong-Wen Chen, 2018. "Guidance on the Conceptual Design of Sustainable Product–Service Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rita Henriques & Filipa Figueiredo & João Nunes, 2023. "Product-Services for a Resource-Efficient and Circular Economy: An Updated Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-24, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emilio Abad-Segura & Ana Batlles-delaFuente & Mariana-Daniela González-Zamar & Luis Jesús Belmonte-Ureña, 2021. "Implications for Sustainability of the Joint Application of Bioeconomy and Circular Economy: A Worldwide Trend Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-24, June.
    2. Gaviria-Marin, Magaly & Merigó, José M. & Baier-Fuentes, Hugo, 2019. "Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 194-220.
    3. Vivek Kumar Singh & Prashasti Singh & Mousumi Karmakar & Jacqueline Leta & Philipp Mayr, 2021. "The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(6), pages 5113-5142, June.
    4. Pantea Kamrani & Isabelle Dorsch & Wolfgang G. Stock, 2021. "Do researchers know what the h-index is? And how do they estimate its importance?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(7), pages 5489-5508, July.
    5. Ignacio Rodríguez-Rodríguez & José-Víctor Rodríguez & Niloofar Shirvanizadeh & Andrés Ortiz & Domingo-Javier Pardo-Quiles, 2021. "Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Big Data and the Internet of Things to the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scientometric Review Using Text Mining," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-29, August.
    6. Parul Khurana & Kiran Sharma, 2022. "Impact of h-index on author’s rankings: an improvement to the h-index for lower-ranked authors," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(8), pages 4483-4498, August.
    7. Weisheng Chiu & Thomas Chun Man Fan & Sang-Back Nam & Ping-Hung Sun, 2021. "Knowledge Mapping and Sustainable Development of eSports Research: A Bibliometric and Visualized Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-17, September.
    8. Andrzej Lis & Agata Sudolska & Mateusz Tomanek, 2020. "Mapping Research on Sustainable Supply-Chain Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-26, May.
    9. Sergio Copiello, 2019. "The open access citation premium may depend on the openness and inclusiveness of the indexing database, but the relationship is controversial because it is ambiguous where the open access boundary lie," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 121(2), pages 995-1018, November.
    10. Paúl Carrión-Mero & Néstor Montalván-Burbano & Fernando Morante-Carballo & Adolfo Quesada-Román & Boris Apolo-Masache, 2021. "Worldwide Research Trends in Landslide Science," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-24, September.
    11. Philipp Korom, 2019. "A bibliometric visualization of the economics and sociology of wealth inequality: a world apart?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 118(3), pages 849-868, March.
    12. Mingers, John & Leydesdorff, Loet, 2015. "A review of theory and practice in scientometrics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(1), pages 1-19.
    13. Maor Weinberger & Maayan Zhitomirsky-Geffet, 2021. "Diversity of success: measuring the scholarly performance diversity of tenured professors in the Israeli academia," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(4), pages 2931-2970, April.
    14. Gerson Pech & Catarina Delgado, 2020. "Assessing the publication impact using citation data from both Scopus and WoS databases: an approach validated in 15 research fields," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(2), pages 909-924, November.
    15. Carlo Dindorf & Eva Bartaguiz & Freya Gassmann & Michael Fröhlich, 2022. "Conceptual Structure and Current Trends in Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning Research in Sports: A Bibliometric Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-23, December.
    16. Fernando Morante-Carballo & Néstor Montalván-Burbano & Paúl Carrión-Mero & Nathaly Espinoza-Santos, 2021. "Cation Exchange of Natural Zeolites: Worldwide Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-26, July.
    17. Waltman, Ludo, 2016. "A review of the literature on citation impact indicators," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 365-391.
    18. Hugo Baier-Fuentes & José M. Merigó & José Ernesto Amorós & Magaly Gaviria-Marín, 2019. "International entrepreneurship: a bibliometric overview," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 385-429, June.
    19. Shir Aviv-Reuven & Ariel Rosenfeld, 2023. "A logical set theory approach to journal subject classification analysis: intra-system irregularities and inter-system discrepancies in Web of Science and Scopus," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(1), pages 157-175, January.
    20. Belén Payán-Sánchez & Luis Jesús Belmonte-Ureña & José Antonio Plaza-Úbeda & Diego Vazquez-Brust & Natalia Yakovleva & Miguel Pérez-Valls, 2021. "Open Innovation for Sustainability or Not: Literature Reviews of Global Research Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-29, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:19:p:10123-:d:643830. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.