IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i6p1763-d216613.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Sustainable Innovation—Additional Services for Products Based on Personalised Customer Value

Author

Listed:
  • Shaofei Jiang

    (College of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310000, China)

  • Di Feng

    (College of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310000, China)

  • Chunfu Lu

    (Industrial Design Institute, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310000, China)

Abstract

As a sustainable innovation, offering additional services for products (ASP) is rapidly emerging as an increasingly important consideration for manufactories. Although additional services can increase enhance product utility, there is no guarantee that they will be accepted by customers. This may lead to a waste of product and service resources. Customer acceptance is a prerequisite for sustainability. However, existing service evaluation methods do not support the evaluation of customer acceptance of ASP prior to implementation. We confirmed that customer value can be used to evaluate customer acceptance of ASP based on the conclusion that this factor plays a decisive role in customer acceptance and customer value can be used to evaluate products and services. Then we establish an evaluation model to measure the difference in customer value between products with and without ASP. Utility, input, and supply–demand coefficient were used to quantitatively describe the personalised customer value of customer segments. This approach supports manufacturers in the process of estimating customer acceptance of ASP prior to the allocation of service resources to the implementation of procedure. Using this model, manufactories can provide the most acceptable ASP for different customer groups with less service resources. Finally, the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method to measure customer acceptance were established based on the measurement of customer value of the ASP in the case of portable fire extinguishers.

Suggested Citation

  • Shaofei Jiang & Di Feng & Chunfu Lu, 2019. "A Sustainable Innovation—Additional Services for Products Based on Personalised Customer Value," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:6:p:1763-:d:216613
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/6/1763/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/6/1763/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christa Liedtke & Johannes Buhl & Najine Ameli, 2013. "Microfoundations for Sustainable Growth with Eco-Intelligent Product Service-Arrangements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Ruiz, David Martín & Gremler, Dwayne D. & Washburn, Judith H. & Carrión, Gabriel Cepeda, 2008. "Service value revisited: Specifying a higher-order, formative measure," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(12), pages 1278-1291, December.
    3. Ricardo J. Hernández Pardo & Tracy Bhamra & Ran Bhamra, 2012. "Sustainable Product Service Systems in Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs): Opportunities in the Leather Manufacturing Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-18, January.
    4. Tseng, Ming-Lang & Wu, Kuo-Jui & Chiu, Anthony SF. & Lim, Ming K. & Tan, Kimhua, 2018. "Service innovation in sustainable product service systems: Improving performance under linguistic preferences," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 414-425.
    5. Collier, Joel E. & Barnes, Donald C., 2015. "Self-service delight: Exploring the hedonic aspects of self-service," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(5), pages 986-993.
    6. Fynes, Brian & De Burca, Sean, 2005. "The effects of design quality on quality performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 1-14, April.
    7. Chen, Kaui-Hwang & Wang, Chun-Hsien & Huang, Shi-Zheng & Shen, George C., 2016. "Service innovation and new product performance: The influence of market-linking capabilities and market turbulence," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 54-64.
    8. Li-Hsing Shih & Yen-Ting Lee & Fenghueih Huarng, 2016. "Creating Customer Value for Product Service Systems by Incorporating Internet of Things Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-16, November.
    9. Catherine E. Cherry & Nick F. Pidgeon, 2018. "Why Is Ownership an Issue? Exploring Factors That Determine Public Acceptance of Product-Service Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Patrik Richnák & Klaudia Gubová, 2021. "Green and Reverse Logistics in Conditions of Sustainable Development in Enterprises in Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-23, January.
    2. Monika Spychalska-Wojtkiewicz, 2020. "The Relation between Sustainable Development Trends and Customer Value Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-18, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chunting Liu & Guozhu Jia & Jili Kong, 2020. "Requirement-Oriented Engineering Characteristic Identification for a Sustainable Product–Service System: A Multi-Method Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Carlos Galera-Zarco & José Antonio Campos, 2021. "Exploring Servitization in Industrial Construction: A Sustainable Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Zhou, Dan & Yan, Tingting & Zhao, Lilong & Guo, Jingjing, 2020. "Performance implications of servitization: Does a Manufacturer's service supply network matter?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 31-42.
    4. Mina Nasiri & Minna Saunila & Tero Rantala & Juhani Ukko, 2022. "Sustainable innovation among small businesses: The role of digital orientation, the external environment, and company characteristics," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(4), pages 703-712, August.
    5. Pengen Mai & Steven James Day, 2023. "Persuading Reluctant Customers: The Online Marketing Communications of Car Sharing Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-18, December.
    6. Ahrholdt, Dennis C. & Gudergan, Siegfried P. & Ringle, Christian M., 2019. "Enhancing loyalty: When improving consumer satisfaction and delight matters," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 18-27.
    7. Pick-Soon Ling & Ming K. Lim & Ming-Lang Tseng, 2020. "Assessing Sustainable Foreign Direct Investment Performance in Malaysia: A Comparison on Policy Makers and Investor Perceptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-38, October.
    8. Wunhong Su & Liuzhen Zhang & Chao Ge & Shuai Chen, 2022. "Association between Internal Control and Sustainability: A Literature Review Based on the SOX Act Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-30, August.
    9. VGR Chandran & Tariq Ahmed & Fedwa Jebli & Alexander Josiassen & Eva Lang, 2024. "Developing innovation capability in the hotel industry, who and what is important? A mixed methods approach," Tourism Economics, , vol. 30(3), pages 728-748, May.
    10. Angela Dettori, 2020. "Sustainability as a Matrix of Experiential Marketing," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(2), pages 1-29, March.
    11. Dubey, Prince & Bajpai, Naval & Guha, Sanjay & Kulshreshtha, Kushagra, 2020. "Mapping gender and marital roles on customer delight by value perception for mobile technology in India," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    12. Simoni F. Rohden & Lélis Balestrin Espartel, 2024. "Consumer reactions to technology in retail: choice uncertainty and reduced perceived control in decisions assisted by recommendation agents," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 901-923, June.
    13. Beatrice Lerma & Doriana Dal Palù & Marco Actis Grande & Claudia De Giorgi, 2017. "Could Black Be the New Gold? Design-Driven Challenges in New Sustainable Luxury Materials for Jewelry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, December.
    14. Marcos Ferasso & Tatiana Beliaeva & Sascha Kraus & Thomas Clauss & Domingo Ribeiro‐Soriano, 2020. "Circular economy business models: The state of research and avenues ahead," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3006-3024, December.
    15. Bradley, Gregory T. & LaFleur, Elizabeth K., 2016. "Toward the development of hedonic-utilitarian measures of retail service," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 60-66.
    16. Echo Orinya Christopher & Paul Terfa Ihuman & Aja David Okpabi & Odoh Friday, 2023. "Effect of Knowledge Management on Corporate Performance of Pharmaceutical Companies in Nigeria," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 10(11), pages 220-234, November.
    17. Kai Ding & Pingyu Jiang & Mei Zheng, 2017. "Environmental and economic sustainability-aware resource service scheduling for industrial product service systems," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(6), pages 1303-1316, August.
    18. Li, Ai Qiang & Kumar, Maneesh & Claes, Björn & Found, Pauline, 2020. "The state-of-the-art of the theory on Product-Service Systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    19. Sehrish Atif, 2023. "Mapping circular economy principles and servitisation approach in business model canvas: an integrated literature review," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-21, December.
    20. Jungell-Michelsson, Jessica & Heikkurinen, Pasi, 2022. "Sufficiency: A systematic literature review," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:6:p:1763-:d:216613. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.