IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i3p835-d312215.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling Method for Cost and Carbon Emission of Sheep Transportation Based on Path Optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Mengjie Zhang

    (College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Lei Wang

    (College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Huanhuan Feng

    (College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Luwei Zhang

    (College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Xiaoshuan Zhang

    (College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
    Beijing Laboratory of Food Quality and Safety, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Jun Li

    (College of Economics and Management, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

Energy conservation, cost, and emission reduction are the research topics of most concern today. The aim of this paper is to reduce the cost and carbon emissions and improve the sustainable development of sheep transportation. Under the typical case of the “farmers–middlemen–slaughterhouses” (FMS) supply model, this paper comprehensively analyzed the factors, sources, and types of cost and carbon emissions in the process of sheep transportation, and a quantitative evaluation model was established. The genetic algorithm (GA) was proposed to search for the optimal path of sheep transportation, and then the model solving algorithm was designed based on the basic GA. The results of path optimization indicated that the optimal solution can be obtained effectively when the range of basic parameters of GA was set reasonably. The optimal solution is the optimal path and the shortest distance under the supply mode of FMS, and the route distance of the optimal path is 245.6 km less than that of random path. From the cost distribution, the fuel power cost of the vehicle, labor cost in transportation, and consumables cost account for a large proportion, while the operation and management cost of the vehicle and depreciation cost of the tires account for a small proportion. The total cost of the optimal path is 26.5% lower than that of the random path, and the total carbon emissions are 36.3% lower than that of random path. Path optimization can thus significantly reduce the cost of different types and significantly reduce the proportion of vehicle fuel power cost and consumables cost, but the degree of cost reduction of different types is different. The result of the optimal path is the key to be explored in this study, and it can be used as the best reference for sheep transportation. The quantitative evaluation model established in this paper can systematically measure the cost and carbon emissions generated in the sheep transportation, which can provide theoretical support for practical application.

Suggested Citation

  • Mengjie Zhang & Lei Wang & Huanhuan Feng & Luwei Zhang & Xiaoshuan Zhang & Jun Li, 2020. "Modeling Method for Cost and Carbon Emission of Sheep Transportation Based on Path Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-23, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:3:p:835-:d:312215
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/3/835/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/3/835/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daryanto, Yosef & Wee, Hui Ming & Astanti, Ririn Diar, 2019. "Three-echelon supply chain model considering carbon emission and item deterioration," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 368-383.
    2. Ozbaygin, Gizem & Savelsbergh, Martin, 2019. "An iterative re-optimization framework for the dynamic vehicle routing problem with roaming delivery locations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 207-235.
    3. Jennergren, L. Peter, 2018. "A note on the linear and annuity class of depreciation methods," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 123-134.
    4. Drexl, Michael & Schneider, Michael, 2015. "A survey of variants and extensions of the location-routing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(2), pages 283-308.
    5. Küpper, Hans-Ulrich & Pedell, Burkhard, 2016. "Which asset valuation and depreciation method should be used for regulated utilities? An analytical and simulation-based comparison," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 88-103.
    6. Li, Hongqi & Lu, Yue & Zhang, Jun & Wang, Tianyi, 2013. "Trends in road freight transportation carbon dioxide emissions and policies in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 99-106.
    7. Y Bouchery & Jan C Fransoo, 2015. "Cost, carbon emissions and modal shift in intermodal network design decisions," Post-Print hal-01954452, HAL.
    8. Bouchery, Yann & Fransoo, Jan, 2015. "Cost, carbon emissions and modal shift in intermodal network design decisions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 388-399.
    9. Bargos, Fabiano Fernandes & Lamas, Wendell de Queiroz & Bargos, Danubia Caporusso & Neto, Morun Bernardino & Pardal, Paula Cristiane Pinto Mesquita, 2016. "Location problem method applied to sugar and ethanol mills location optimization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 274-282.
    10. Tang, Shaolong & Wang, Wenjie & Cho, Stella & Yan, Hong, 2018. "Reducing emissions in transportation and inventory management: (R, Q) Policy with considerations of carbon reduction," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(1), pages 327-340.
    11. Park, Chung & Lee, Jungpyo & Sohn, So Young, 2019. "Recommendation of feeder bus routes using neural network embedding-based optimization," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 329-341.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hao Wang & Quan Liu & Hongyang Zhang & Yinlong Jin & Wenzhen Yu, 2022. "A Two-Stage Decision-Making Method Based on WebGIS for Bulk Material Transportation of Hydropower Construction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-21, February.
    2. Yongmao Xiao & Wei Yan & Ruping Wang & Zhigang Jiang & Ying Liu, 2021. "Research on Blank Optimization Design Based on Low-Carbon and Low-Cost Blank Process Route Optimization Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-21, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maiyar, Lohithaksha M. & Thakkar, Jitesh J., 2019. "Modelling and analysis of intermodal food grain transportation under hub disruption towards sustainability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 281-297.
    2. Xing, Hui & Spence, Stephen & Chen, Hua, 2020. "A comprehensive review on countermeasures for CO2 emissions from ships," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    3. De Moor, Bram J. & Creemers, Stefan & Boute, Robert N., 2023. "Breaking truck dominance in supply chains: Proactive freight consolidation and modal split transport," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    4. Ralf Elbert & Lowis Seikowsky, 2017. "The influences of behavioral biases, barriers and facilitators on the willingness of forwarders’ decision makers to modal shift from unimodal road freight transport to intermodal road–rail freight tra," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(8), pages 1083-1123, November.
    5. Fan, Yee Van & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír & Walmsley, Timothy Gordon & Perry, Simon, 2019. "Minimising energy consumption and environmental burden of freight transport using a novel graphical decision-making tool," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    6. Snežana Tadić & Mladen Krstić & Milovan Kovač, 2023. "Assessment of city logistics initiative categories sustainability: case of Belgrade," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 1383-1419, February.
    7. Damian Bonk & Sylwia Kowalska, 2020. "Modal Choice Preferences in Inland Container Transport in Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 99-109.
    8. Bouchery, Yann & Woxenius, Johan & Fransoo, Jan C., 2020. "Identifying the market areas of port-centric logistics and hinterland intermodal transportation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(2), pages 599-611.
    9. Volha Yakavenka & Ioannis Mallidis & Dimitrios Vlachos & Eleftherios Iakovou & Zafeiriou Eleni, 2020. "Development of a multi-objective model for the design of sustainable supply chains: the case of perishable food products," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 294(1), pages 593-621, November.
    10. Kurtuluş, Ercan & Çetin, İsmail Bilge, 2020. "Analysis of modal shift potential towards intermodal transportation in short-distance inland container transport," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 24-37.
    11. Masone, Adriano & Marzano, Vittorio & Simonelli, Fulvio & Sterle, Claudio, 2024. "Exact and heuristic approaches for the Modal Shift Incentive Problem," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    12. Snežana Tadić & Milovan Kovač & Mladen Krstić & Violeta Roso & Nikolina Brnjac, 2021. "The Selection of Intermodal Transport System Scenarios in the Function of Southeastern Europe Regional Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-25, May.
    13. Basallo-Triana, Mario José & Bravo-Bastidas, Juan José & Contreras, Ivan & Cordeau, Jean-François & Vidal-Holguín, Carlos Julio, 2023. "Intermodal hub network design with generalized capacity constraints and non-synchronized train–truck operations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    14. Chaiya Chomchalao & Sasitorn Kaewman & Rapeepan Pitakaso & Kanchana Sethanan, 2018. "An Algorithm to Manage Transportation Logistics That Considers Sabotage Risk," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-17, July.
    15. Hu, Qiaolin & Gu, Weihua & Wang, Shuaian, 2022. "Optimal subsidy scheme design for promoting intermodal freight transport," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    16. Daniel Ruben Pinchasik & Inger Beate Hovi & Christian Svendsen Mjøsund & Stein Erik Grønland & Erik Fridell & Martin Jerksjö, 2020. "Crossing Borders and Expanding Modal Shift Measures: Effects on Mode Choice and Emissions from Freight Transport in the Nordics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-23, January.
    17. El Yaagoubi, Amina & Ferjani, Aicha & Essaghir, Yasmina & Sheikhahmadi, Farrokh & Abourraja, Mohamed Nezar & Boukachour, Jaouad & Baron, Marie-Laure & Duvallet, Claude & Khodadad-Saryazdi, Ali, 2022. "A logistic model for a french intermodal rail/road freight transportation system," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    18. Christine Tawfik & Sabine Limbourg, 2018. "Pricing Problems in Intermodal Freight Transport: Research Overview and Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, September.
    19. Daiki Min & Kwanghun Chung, 2017. "A Joint Optimal Decision on Shipment Size and Carbon Reduction under Direct Shipment and Peddling Distribution Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-21, November.
    20. Qiu, Xuan & Xu, Su Xiu & Xu, Gangyan, 2021. "Pricing and scheduling of barge hinterland transportation service for inbound containers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:3:p:835-:d:312215. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.