IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i24p10476-d462271.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design and Implementation of a Co-Simulation Framework for Testing of Automated Driving Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Demin Nalic

    (Institute of Automotive Engineering, TU Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria)

  • Aleksa Pandurevic

    (Institute of Automotive Engineering, TU Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria)

  • Arno Eichberger

    (Institute of Automotive Engineering, TU Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria)

  • Branko Rogic

    (MAGNA Steyr Fahrzeugtechnik AG Co. & KG, 8045 Graz, Austria)

Abstract

The increasingly used approach of combining different simulation softwares in testing of automated driving systems (ADSs) increases the need for potential and convenient software designs. Recently developed co-simulation platforms (CSPs) provide the possibility to cover the high demand for testing kilometers for ADSs by combining vehicle simulation software (VSS) with traffic flow simulation software (TFSS) environments. The emphasis on the demand for testing kilometers is not enough to choose a suitable CSP. The complexity levels of the vehicle, object, sensors, and environment models used are essential for valid and representative simulation results. Choosing a suitable CSP raises the question of how the test procedures should be defined and constructed and what the relevant test scenarios are. Parameters of the ADS, environments, objects, and sensors in the VSS, as well as traffic parameters in the TFSS, can be used to define and generate test scenarios. In order to generate a large number of scenarios in a systematic and automated way, suitable and appropriate software designs are required. In this paper, we present a software design for a CSP based on the Model–View–Controller (MVC) design pattern as well as an implementation of a complex CSP for virtual testing of ADSs. Based on this design, an implementation of a CSP is presented using the VSS from IPG Automotive (CarMaker) and the TFSS from the PTV Group (Vissim). The results showed that the presented CSP design and the implementation of the co-simulation can be used to generate relevant scenarios for testing of ADSs.

Suggested Citation

  • Demin Nalic & Aleksa Pandurevic & Arno Eichberger & Branko Rogic, 2020. "Design and Implementation of a Co-Simulation Framework for Testing of Automated Driving Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-12, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:24:p:10476-:d:462271
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10476/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10476/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin Fellendorf & Peter Vortisch, 2010. "Microscopic Traffic Flow Simulator VISSIM," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Jaume Barceló (ed.), Fundamentals of Traffic Simulation, chapter 0, pages 63-93, Springer.
    2. Kalra, Nidhi & Paddock, Susan M., 2016. "Driving to safety: How many miles of driving would it take to demonstrate autonomous vehicle reliability?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 182-193.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huiyuan Xiong & Huan Liu & Jian Ma & Yuelong Pan & Ronghui Zhang, 2021. "An NN-Based Double Parallel Longitudinal and Lateral Driving Strategy for Self-Driving Transport Vehicles in Structured Road Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, April.
    2. Demin Nalic & Aleksa Pandurevic & Arno Eichberger & Martin Fellendorf & Branko Rogic, 2021. "Software Framework for Testing of Automated Driving Systems in the Traffic Environment of Vissim," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-9, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Demin Nalic & Aleksa Pandurevic & Arno Eichberger & Martin Fellendorf & Branko Rogic, 2021. "Software Framework for Testing of Automated Driving Systems in the Traffic Environment of Vissim," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-9, May.
    2. Andrea Bertolini & Massimo Riccaboni, 2021. "Grounding the case for a European approach to the regulation of automated driving: the technology-selection effect of liability rules," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 243-284, April.
    3. Khastgir, Siddartha & Brewerton, Simon & Thomas, John & Jennings, Paul, 2021. "Systems Approach to Creating Test Scenarios for Automated Driving Systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    4. Yueqi Mao & Qiang Mei & Peng Jing & Ye Zha & Ying Xue & Jiahui Huang & Danning Shao & Pan Luo, 2022. "Factors Affecting the Parental Intention of Using AVs to Escort Children: An Integrated SEM–Hybrid Choice Model Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-21, September.
    5. Blume, Maximilian & Oberländer, Anna Maria & Röglinger, Maximilian & Rosemann, Michael & Wyrtki, Katrin, 2020. "Ex ante assessment of disruptive threats: Identifying relevant threats before one is disrupted," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    6. Fatemeh Enayatollahi & Ahmed Osman Idris & M. A. Amiri Atashgah, 2019. "Modelling bus bunching under variable transit demand using cellular automata," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 269-298, August.
    7. Peng Liu & Run Yang & Zhigang Xu, 2019. "How Safe Is Safe Enough for Self‐Driving Vehicles?," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(2), pages 315-325, February.
    8. Henry X. Liu & Shuo Feng, 2024. "Curse of rarity for autonomous vehicles," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-5, December.
    9. Winston, Clifford & Karpilow, Quentin, 2017. "A New Route to Increasing Economic Growth: Reducing Highway Congestion with Autonomous Vehicles," Working Papers 03323, George Mason University, Mercatus Center.
    10. Zoltan Ferenc Magosi & Christoph Wellershaus & Viktor Roland Tihanyi & Patrick Luley & Arno Eichberger, 2022. "Evaluation Methodology for Physical Radar Perception Sensor Models Based on On-Road Measurements for the Testing and Validation of Automated Driving," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-20, March.
    11. Hudson, John & Orviska, Marta & Hunady, Jan, 2019. "People’s attitudes to autonomous vehicles," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 164-176.
    12. Abdelghany, Ahmed & Abdelghany, Khaled & Mahmassani, Hani, 2016. "A hybrid simulation-assignment modeling framework for crowd dynamics in large-scale pedestrian facilities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 159-176.
    13. Liu, Peng & Zhang, Yawen & He, Zhen, 2019. "The effect of population age on the acceptable safety of self-driving vehicles," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 341-347.
    14. Cian Ryan & Finbarr Murphy & Martin Mullins, 2019. "Semiautonomous Vehicle Risk Analysis: A Telematics‐Based Anomaly Detection Approach," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(5), pages 1125-1140, May.
    15. Xuan Fang & Hexuan Li & Tamás Tettamanti & Arno Eichberger & Martin Fellendorf, 2022. "Effects of Automated Vehicle Models at the Mixed Traffic Situation on a Motorway Scenario," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-15, March.
    16. Hazel Si Min Lim & Araz Taeihagh, 2019. "Algorithmic Decision-Making in AVs: Understanding Ethical and Technical Concerns for Smart Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-28, October.
    17. Jie Min & Yili Hong & Caleb B. King & William Q. Meeker, 2022. "Reliability analysis of artificial intelligence systems using recurrent events data from autonomous vehicles," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(4), pages 987-1013, August.
    18. Marius Wenning & Anton Akira Backhaus & Tobias Adlon & Peter Burggräf, 2022. "Testing the reliability of monocular obstacle detection methods in a simulated 3D factory environment," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(7), pages 2157-2165, October.
    19. Monika Ziemska-Osuch & Dawid Osuch, 2022. "Modeling the Assessment of Intersections with Traffic Lights and the Significance Level of the Number of Pedestrians in Microsimulation Models Based on the PTV Vissim Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-11, July.
    20. Mauricio Marcano & José A. Matute & Ray Lattarulo & Enrique Martí & Joshué Pérez, 2018. "Low Speed Longitudinal Control Algorithms for Automated Vehicles in Simulation and Real Platforms," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-12, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:24:p:10476-:d:462271. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.