IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v205y2018icp256-271.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The evolution of performance measurement systems in a supply chain: A longitudinal case study on the role of interorganisational factors

Author

Listed:
  • Hald, Kim Sundtoft
  • Mouritsen, Jan

Abstract

Supply chain performance measurement systems are important because they are the central managerial mechanisms for achieving efficient and effective supply chain management. Therefore, it is relevant to add to the many conceptual contributions on the subject to explore how such systems unfold and develop in practice. The objective of the present study is to investigate how forces located outside focal firm boundaries influence the evolution of performance measurement systems in supply chains. An evolutionary and dialectic approach is applied, acknowledging that change may be the result of collective action and of opposing influences and forces. Using a longitudinal case study approach, the emergence, proliferation and reconfiguration of three varied yet interrelated performance measurement systems designed to manage a supply chain in the hearing aid industry are explored. The case shows how the evolution of performance measurement systems in supply chains may be informed by multiple influences, some of which are external to the firm. Specifically, ‘interconnectivity of performance measures’, ‘availability and ownership of performance information’ and ‘performance representations’ are all found to be important factors influencing the evolution of the observed performance measurement systems. The framework of the proposed factors here builds on and extends previous research, which has not explicitly incorporated the potential influences of external entities and the supply chain context. Thus, the findings expand our knowledge on how performance measurement systems develop over time in supply chains. With this new knowledge, managers should be better equipped to develop robust and enduring performance measurement systems in supply chains.

Suggested Citation

  • Hald, Kim Sundtoft & Mouritsen, Jan, 2018. "The evolution of performance measurement systems in a supply chain: A longitudinal case study on the role of interorganisational factors," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 256-271.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:205:y:2018:i:c:p:256-271
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.09.021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527318303918
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.09.021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Harri Laihonen & Sanna Pekkola, 2016. "Impacts of using a performance measurement system in supply chain management: a case study," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(18), pages 5607-5617, September.
    2. Ganga, Gilberto Miller Devós & Carpinetti, Luiz Cesar Ribeiro, 2011. "A fuzzy logic approach to supply chain performance management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 177-187, November.
    3. Miguel Afonso Sellitto & Giancarlo Medeiros Pereira & Miriam Borchardt & Rosnaldo Inácio da Silva & Cláudia Viviane Viegas, 2015. "A SCOR-based model for supply chain performance measurement: application in the footwear industry," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(16), pages 4917-4926, August.
    4. Estampe, Dominique & Lamouri, Samir & Paris, Jean-Luc & Brahim-Djelloul, Sakina, 2013. "A framework for analysing supply chain performance evaluation models," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(2), pages 247-258.
    5. Hassini, Elkafi & Surti, Chirag & Searcy, Cory, 2012. "A literature review and a case study of sustainable supply chains with a focus on metrics," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 69-82.
    6. Schmitz, J. & Platts, K. W., 2004. "Supplier logistics performance measurement: Indications from a study in the automotive industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(2), pages 231-243, May.
    7. repec:eme:aaajpp:v:26:y:2013:i:2:p:196-233 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Gianmario Verona & Davide Ravasi, 2003. "Unbundling dynamic capabilities: an exploratory study of continuous product innovation," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 12(3), pages 577-606, June.
    9. Andrew M. Pettigrew, 1990. "Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(3), pages 267-292, August.
    10. Braz, Renata Gomes Frutuoso & Scavarda, Luiz Felipe & Martins, Roberto Antonio, 2011. "Reviewing and improving performance measurement systems: An action research," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(2), pages 751-760, October.
    11. Waggoner, Daniel B. & Neely, Andy D. & P. Kennerley, Mike, 1999. "The forces that shape organisational performance measurement systems: An interdisciplinary review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 53-60, April.
    12. Wolfgang Ulaga, 2003. "Capturing value creation in business relationships: A customer perspective," Post-Print hal-00484963, HAL.
    13. Jazayeri, Mostafa & Scapens, Robert W., 2008. "The Business Values Scorecard within BAE Systems: The evolution of a performance measurement system," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 48-70.
    14. Gutierrez, Debora M. & Scavarda, Luiz F. & Fiorencio, Luiza & Martins, Roberto A., 2015. "Evolution of the performance measurement system in the Logistics Department of a broadcasting company: An action research," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 1-12.
    15. Wouters, Marc & Wilderom, Celeste, 2008. "Developing performance-measurement systems as enabling formalization: A longitudinal field study of a logistics department," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(4-5), pages 488-516.
    16. Gunasekaran, A. & Patel, C. & McGaughey, Ronald E., 2004. "A framework for supply chain performance measurement," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(3), pages 333-347, February.
    17. Maestrini, Vieri & Luzzini, Davide & Maccarrone, Paolo & Caniato, Federico, 2017. "Supply chain performance measurement systems: A systematic review and research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PA), pages 299-315.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anderson Nunes Silva & Marcele Elisa Fontana, 2024. "A New Model to Consolidate Long-Term Intersectoral Partnerships in Humanitarian and Social Crises Management," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 27-51, March.
    2. Seiler, A. & Papanagnou, C. & Scarf, P., 2020. "On the relationship between financial performance and position of businesses in supply chain networks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    3. Jääskeläinen, Aki, 2021. "The relational outcomes of performance management in buyer-supplier relationships," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    4. Kim Sundtoft Hald & Martin Spring, 2023. "Actor–network theory: A novel approach to supply chain management theory development," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 59(2), pages 87-105, April.
    5. Johnson, Andrew & Carnovale, Steven & Song, Ju Myung & Zhao, Yao, 2021. "Drivers of fulfillment performance in mission critical logistics systems: An empirical analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    6. Chand, Pushpendu & Thakkar, Jitesh J. & Ghosh, Kunal Kanti, 2020. "Analysis of supply chain performance metrics for Indian mining & earthmoving equipment manufacturing companies using hybrid MCDM model," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    7. Davidson de Almeida Santos & Osvaldo Luiz Gonçalves Quelhas & Carlos Francisco Simões Gomes & Luis Perez Zotes & Sérgio Luiz Braga França & Guilherme Vinagre Pinto de Souza & Robson Amarante de Araújo, 2020. "Proposal for a Maturity Model in Sustainability in the Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-37, November.
    8. Iman Ghasemian Sahebi & Seyed Pendar Toufighi & Gencay Karakaya & Shahryar Ghorbani, 2022. "An intuitive fuzzy approach for evaluating financial resiliency of supply chain," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 59(2), pages 460-481, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maestrini, Vieri & Luzzini, Davide & Maccarrone, Paolo & Caniato, Federico, 2017. "Supply chain performance measurement systems: A systematic review and research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PA), pages 299-315.
    2. Lima-Junior, Francisco Rodrigues & Carpinetti, Luiz Cesar Ribeiro, 2019. "Predicting supply chain performance based on SCOR® metrics and multilayer perceptron neural networks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 19-38.
    3. Seiler, A. & Papanagnou, C. & Scarf, P., 2020. "On the relationship between financial performance and position of businesses in supply chain networks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    4. Jędrzej Charłampowicz, 2018. "Supply Chain Efficiency On The Maritime Container Shipping Markets – Selected Issues," Business Logistics in Modern Management, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Economics, Croatia, vol. 18, pages 357-368.
    5. Mohamed Rafik Noor Mohamed Qureshi, 2022. "Evaluating and Prioritizing the Enablers of Supply Chain Performance Management System (SCPMS) for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-21, September.
    6. Adivar, Burcu & Hüseyinoğlu, Işık Özge Yumurtacı & Christopher, Martin, 2019. "A quantitative performance management framework for assessing omnichannel retail supply chains," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 257-269.
    7. Brint, Andrew & Genovese, Andrea & Piccolo, Carmela & Taboada-Perez, Gerardo J., 2021. "Reducing data requirements when selecting key performance indicators for supply chain management: The case of a multinational automotive component manufacturer," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    8. Gutierrez, Debora M. & Scavarda, Luiz F. & Fiorencio, Luiza & Martins, Roberto A., 2015. "Evolution of the performance measurement system in the Logistics Department of a broadcasting company: An action research," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 1-12.
    9. Dubey, Rameshwar & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Papadopoulos, Thanos, 2024. "Benchmarking operations and supply chain management practices using Generative AI: Towards a theoretical framework," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    10. Katiyar, Rajesh & Meena, Purushottam L. & Barua, Mukesh Kumar & Tibrewala, Rajen & Kumar, Gopal, 2018. "Impact of sustainability and manufacturing practices on supply chain performance: Findings from an emerging economy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 303-316.
    11. Rafał Haffer, 2018. "Supply Chain Performance Measurement System Of Logistics Service Providers. A Conceptual Framework And Research Agenda," Business Logistics in Modern Management, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Economics, Croatia, vol. 18, pages 85-108.
    12. Zanon, Lucas Gabriel & Munhoz Arantes, Rafael Ferro & Calache, Lucas Daniel Del Rosso & Carpinetti, Luiz Cesar Ribeiro, 2020. "A decision making model based on fuzzy inference to predict the impact of SCOR® indicators on customer perceived value," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    13. Maestrini, Vieri & Luzzini, Davide & Caniato, Federico & Ronchi, Stefano, 2018. "Effects of monitoring and incentives on supplier performance: An agency theory perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 322-332.
    14. Graça, Paula & Camarinha-Matos, Luís M., 2017. "Performance indicators for collaborative business ecosystems — Literature review and trends," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 237-255.
    15. Nakandala, Dilupa & Samaranayake, Premaratne & Lau, H.C.W., 2013. "A fuzzy-based decision support model for monitoring on-time delivery performance: A textile industry case study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(3), pages 507-517.
    16. Jääskeläinen, Aki, 2021. "The relational outcomes of performance management in buyer-supplier relationships," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    17. NNC Pushpamali & Duzgun Agdas & Timothy M. Rose & Tan Yigitcanlar, 2021. "Stakeholder perception of reverse logistics practices on supply chain performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 60-70, January.
    18. Prasanta Kumar Dey & Guo-liang Yang & Chrysovalantis Malesios & Debashree De & Konstantinos Evangelinos, 2021. "Performance Management of Supply Chain Sustainability in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Using a Combined Structural Equation Modelling and Data Envelopment Analysis," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 58(3), pages 573-613, October.
    19. Blanka Tundys & Tomasz Wiśniewski, 2018. "The Selected Method and Tools for Performance Measurement in the Green Supply Chain—Survey Analysis in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-26, February.
    20. Josef-Peter Schöggl & Morgane M. C. Fritz & Rupert J. Baumgartner, 2016. "Sustainability Assessment in Automotive and Electronics Supply Chains—A Set of Indicators Defined in a Multi-Stakeholder Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-20, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:205:y:2018:i:c:p:256-271. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.