IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i20p8378-d426573.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Employee Volunteerism—Conceptual Study and the Current Situation

Author

Listed:
  • Anita Kolnhofer Derecskei

    (Institute of Enterprise Management, Obuda University, Tavaszmező utca 15-17, H-1084 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Viktor Nagy

    (Institute of Enterprise Management, Obuda University, Tavaszmező utca 15-17, H-1084 Budapest, Hungary)

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to analyze employee volunteerism. This issue had not been studied on a broader international level earlier. This research firstly discovers altruism and volunteerism values in the economy. Then, based on the third-party model, observes each part, where participants are the (1) volunteer (employee) (2) company (and its CSR activity) and (3) an external organization, which manages this type of formal volunteerism. Each participant was analyzed through comprehensive analysis using descriptive and inference statistics and classification methods on complex, extensive secondary databases. Altogether, more than 10,000 respondents’ answers are examined from two worldwide surveys, and further ten international statistical indicators and indices are explored. These methods result in volunteer characteristics on a personal level, afterwards in country classification, which provides a cultural comparison of the employee volunteerism. Our findings prove that demographical differences do not, but company-level actions influence the intensity of formal volunteerism. Moreover, three main clusters (formed from 43 countries) show different values. This diversity might partly be caused by measurement fragmentations and lack of internationally accepted definitions and theories. This paper aims to provide a broader overview of the topic, which might be a useful starting point for the forthcoming aggregated conceptualization. Employee volunteers’ behavior arises from the personal value of volunteerism. However, the attendance and intensity of voluntary activity are primarily influenced by the environment (e.g., life period, living and working situation). Employee volunteerism programs are an important and essential part of CSR at the company level, and strongly frames this activity, where employee volunteerism could associate each participant’s interests and improve their values. However, the practices may differ in each country and in each sector. The current pandemic rewrote the traditional volunteerism model and our projection. The last chapter provides a preliminary study about how employee volunteerism could work in this extraordinary, COVID-19 situation.

Suggested Citation

  • Anita Kolnhofer Derecskei & Viktor Nagy, 2020. "Employee Volunteerism—Conceptual Study and the Current Situation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-35, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:20:p:8378-:d:426573
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/20/8378/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/20/8378/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Basil, Debra & Runte, Mary & Basil, Michael & Usher, John, 2011. "Company support for employee volunteerism: Does size matter?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 61-66, January.
    2. Stefano DellaVigna & John A. List & Ulrike Malmendier & Gautam Rao, 2013. "The Importance of Being Marginal: Gender Differences in Generosity," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 103(3), pages 586-590, May.
    3. Abel, Martin & Brown, Willa, 2022. "Prosocial behavior in the time of COVID-19: The effect of private and public role models," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    4. Simon, Herbert A, 1993. "Altruism and Economics," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 83(2), pages 156-161, May.
    5. Frank Li & Taylor Morris & Brian Young, 2019. "The Effect of Corporate Visibility on Corporate Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-16, July.
    6. Susan Houghton & Joan Gabel & David Williams, 2009. "Connecting the Two Faces of CSR: Does Employee Volunteerism Improve Compliance?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 87(4), pages 477-494, July.
    7. Kolk, Ans, 2016. "The social responsibility of international business: From ethics and the environment to CSR and sustainable development," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 23-34.
    8. Debbie Haski-Leventhal & Lonneke Roza & Lucas C. P. M. Meijs, 2017. "Congruence in Corporate Social Responsibility: Connecting the Identity and Behavior of Employers and Employees," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(1), pages 35-51, June.
    9. John Peloza & Simon Hudson & Derek Hassay, 2009. "The Marketing of Employee Volunteerism," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 85(2), pages 371-386, April.
    10. Cycyota, Cynthia S. & Ferrante, Claudia J. & Schroeder, Jessica M., 2016. "Corporate social responsibility and employee volunteerism: What do the best companies do?," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 59(3), pages 321-329.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ana Lor-Serrano & Luisa Esteban-Salvador, 2021. "An Approach to Corporate Volunteering in Spain," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Jaroslav Mazanec, 2022. "Corporate Volunteering as a Current Phenomenon in Corporate Social Responsibility to Support the Career Development and Professional Skills of Employees during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study of t," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Imen Khanchel & Naima Lassoued & Rym Gargoury, 2023. "CSR and firm value: is CSR valuable during the COVID 19 crisis in the French market?," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 27(2), pages 575-601, June.
    4. Dmitry A. Ruban & Vladimir A. Ermolaev & Antonius J. (Tom) van Loon, 2021. "Exploitation of Mineral Resources Requires Proper People: Expectations of the World’s Top Mining Companies," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-19, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jaroslav Mazanec, 2022. "Corporate Volunteering as a Current Phenomenon in Corporate Social Responsibility to Support the Career Development and Professional Skills of Employees during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study of t," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, April.
    2. Carolin Plewa & Jodie Conduit & Pascale Quester & Claire Johnson, 2015. "The Impact of Corporate Volunteering on CSR Image: A Consumer Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 127(3), pages 643-659, March.
    3. Susan van Schie & Arthur Gautier & Anne-Claire Pache & Stefan T. Güntert, 2019. "What Keeps Corporate Volunteers Engaged: Extending the Volunteer Work Design Model with Self-determination Theory Insights," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 160(3), pages 693-712, December.
    4. Seunghee Im & Yang Woon Chung & Ji Yeon Yang, 2018. "The Mediating Roles of Happiness and Cohesion in the Relationship between Employee Volunteerism and Job Performance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-13, December.
    5. Sajjad A. Afridi & Bilal Afsar & Asad Shahjehan & Zia U. Rehman & Maqsood Haider & Mehboob Ullah, 2020. "Retracted: Perceived corporate social responsibility and innovative work behavior: The role of employee volunteerism and authenticity," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1865-1877, July.
    6. Seunghee Im & Yang Woon Chung, 2018. "Employee Volunteering Meaningfulness and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Exploring the Effects of Organizational Support, Pride, and Trust," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, December.
    7. Yang Woon Chung & Seunghee Im & Jung Eun Kim, 2019. "The Role of Volunteer Participation and Person-Organization Fit in the Relationship between Motives and Psychological Well-Being," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    8. Dmitry A. Ruban & Vladimir A. Ermolaev & Antonius J. (Tom) van Loon, 2021. "Exploitation of Mineral Resources Requires Proper People: Expectations of the World’s Top Mining Companies," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-19, September.
    9. Kofi Mintah Oware & Francis Donkor, 2023. "Does the Practice of Employee Volunteerism Affect Workforce Reduction and Defective Product Issues? Evidence from India," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 1369-1383, December.
    10. Rekha Rao-Nicholson & Htwe Htwe Thein & Yifan Zhong, 2024. "A thematic analysis of the links between multinational enterprises’ corporate social responsibility and the Sustainable Development Goals in Myanmar," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(2), pages 203-223, June.
    11. Maja Adena & Julian Harke, 2022. "COVID-19 and pro-sociality: How do donors respond to local pandemic severity, increased salience, and media coverage?," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 25(3), pages 824-844, June.
    12. Zhenjiao Chen & Yaqing Liu, 2020. "The Effects of Leadership and Reward Policy on Employees’ Electricity Saving Behaviors: An Empirical Study in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-15, March.
    13. Ibragimov, Rustam, 2008. "A Tale of Two Tails: Peakedness Properties in Inheritance Models of Evolutionary Theory," Scholarly Articles 2624003, Harvard University Department of Economics.
    14. Bruno S. Frey & Stephan Meier, "undated". "Pro-Social Behavior, Reciprocity or Both?," IEW - Working Papers 107, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics - University of Zurich.
    15. Christine Exley, 2013. "Incentives for Prosocial Behavior: The Role of Reputations," Discussion Papers 12-022, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.
    16. Daniel Jones & Sera Linardi, 2014. "Wallflowers: Experimental Evidence of an Aversion to Standing Out," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(7), pages 1757-1771, July.
    17. Inmaculada Buendía-Martínez & Inmaculada Carrasco Monteagudo, 2020. "The Role of CSR on Social Entrepreneurship: An International Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-22, August.
    18. Tatiana Kozitsina & Anna Mikhaylova & Anna Komkova & Anastasia Peshkovskaya & Anna Sedush & Olga Menshikova & Mikhail Myagkov & Ivan Menshikov, 2020. "Ethnicity and gender influence the decision making in a multinational state: The case of Russia," Papers 2012.01272, arXiv.org.
    19. Lorena Para‐González & Carlos Mascaraque‐Ramírez, 2020. "The six dimensions of CSR as a driver of key results in the shipbuilding industry," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 576-584, March.
    20. MoonJoong Tcha & Fiona Lio, 2002. "An Analysis of Food Aid and Altruism," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 02-19, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:20:p:8378-:d:426573. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.