IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i17p7198-d408308.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Analysis of Traffic Conflicts as a Tool for Sustainable Road Transport

Author

Listed:
  • Vladislav Krivda

    (Department of Transport Constructions, Faculty of Civil Engineering, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, 708 00 Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic)

  • Jan Petru

    (Department of Transport Constructions, Faculty of Civil Engineering, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, 708 00 Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic)

  • David Macha

    (Department of Transport Constructions, Faculty of Civil Engineering, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, 708 00 Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic)

  • Kristyna Plocova

    (Department of Transport Constructions, Faculty of Civil Engineering, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, 708 00 Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic)

  • David Fibich

    (Department of Transport Constructions, Faculty of Civil Engineering, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, 708 00 Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic)

Abstract

This paper presents an approach to partially solving an issue within the scope of sustainable road transport, specifically the issue of potential accidents, i.e., traffic conflicts. First, a method is introduced for the analysis of traffic conflicts using video equipment. The attention is focused on traffic conflicts that occur at turbo-roundabouts. Given the diversity of causes of traffic conflicts, the emphasis is placed on the correct identification of the cause, i.e., whether the conflict is caused only by the negligence of the road user, or whether the conflict is more or less influenced by an inappropriately designed turbo-roundabout or one or more of its specific building elements (e.g., unsuitable corner radius). The next part of the article presents a selection of results that were obtained from analyses performed at about 100 turbo-roundabouts in nine European countries. Illustrative diagrams show the courses of the emergence of traffic conflicts, the causes of which are then described in detail. The conclusions from these analyses confirm the main hypothesis that the evaluation of traffic conflicts should be an essential part of designing roads, in order to increase traffic safety and, importantly, contribute to sustainable transport.

Suggested Citation

  • Vladislav Krivda & Jan Petru & David Macha & Kristyna Plocova & David Fibich, 2020. "An Analysis of Traffic Conflicts as a Tool for Sustainable Road Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-23, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:17:p:7198-:d:408308
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/17/7198/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/17/7198/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liam Magee & Andy Scerri & Paul James & James Thom & Lin Padgham & Sarah Hickmott & Hepu Deng & Felicity Cahill, 2013. "Reframing social sustainability reporting: towards an engaged approach," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 225-243, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Santos Sánchez-Cambronero & Fernando Álvarez-Bazo & Ana Rivas & Inmaculada Gallego, 2021. "Dynamic Route Flow Estimation in Road Networks Using Data from Automatic Number of Plate Recognition Sensors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-30, April.
    2. Jan Petru & Vladislav Krivda, 2021. "An Analysis of Turbo Roundabouts from the Perspective of Sustainability of Road Transportation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-25, February.
    3. Vladislav Krivda & Jan Petru & David Macha & Jakub Novak, 2021. "Use of Microsimulation Traffic Models as Means for Ensuring Public Transport Sustainability and Accessibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-38, March.
    4. Jan Petru & Vladislav Krivda, 2021. "The Transport of Oversized Cargoes from the Perspective of Sustainable Transport Infrastructure in Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-26, May.
    5. Yongfeng Ma & Xin Gu & Ya’nan Yu & Aemal J. Khattakc & Shuyan Chen & Kun Tang, 2021. "Identification of Contributing Factors for Driver’s Perceptual Bias of Aggressive Driving in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-18, January.
    6. Tullio Giuffrè & Anna Granà & Salvatore Trubia, 2021. "Safety Evaluation of Turbo-Roundabouts with and without Internal Traffic Separations Considering Autonomous Vehicles Operation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-14, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Moses Nyakuwanika & Huibrecht Margaretha van der Poll & John Andrew van der Poll, 2021. "A Conceptual Framework for Greener Goldmining through Environmental Management Accounting Practices (EMAPs): The Case of Zimbabwe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-26, September.
    2. Seung-Hee Lee & Jane Workman & Kwangho Jung, 2016. "Perception of Time, Creative Attitudes, and Adoption of Innovations: A Cross-Cultural Study from Chinese and US College Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Jan Petru & Vladislav Krivda, 2021. "An Analysis of Turbo Roundabouts from the Perspective of Sustainability of Road Transportation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-25, February.
    4. Peter M. Bednar & Christine Welch, 0. "Socio-Technical Perspectives on Smart Working: Creating Meaningful and Sustainable Systems," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-18.
    5. Mikelis Grivins & Talis Tisenkopfs & Zaklina Stojanovic & Bojan Ristic, 2016. "A Comparative Analysis of the Social Performance of Global and Local Berry Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-20, June.
    6. Wasapon Thanabodypath & Achara Chandrachai & Sudkate Chaiyo & Orawon Chailapakul, 2021. "Industrial Buyer Innovation Adoption Model: A Focus on a Smartphone-Based Electrochemical Analytical Device for Toxic Heavy Metal Detection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, October.
    7. Hepu Deng & Feng Luo & Santoso Wibowo, 2018. "Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making for Green Supply Chain Management under Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-13, September.
    8. Sanaz Memari & Mahdieh Pazhouhanfar & Patrik Grahn, 2021. "Perceived Sensory Dimensions of Green Areas: An Experimental Study on Stress Recovery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-19, May.
    9. Darian McBain & Ali Alsamawi, 2014. "Quantitative accounting for social economic indicators," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 38(3), pages 193-202, August.
    10. Kim P. Bryceson & Anne Ross, 2020. "Agrifood Chains as Complex Systems and the Role of Informality in Their Sustainability in Small Scale Societies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-20, August.
    11. Phelan, Anna (Anya) & Dawes, Les & Costanza, Robert & Kubiszewski, Ida, 2017. "Evaluation of social externalities in regional communities affected by coal seam gas projects: A case study from Southeast Queensland," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 300-311.
    12. Kuhmonen, Tuomas, 2017. "Exposing the attractors of evolving complex adaptive systems by utilising futures images: Milestones of the food sustainability journey," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 214-225.
    13. Chris R. Colocousis & Cesar J. Rebellon & Nick Smith & Stefan Sobolowski, 2017. "How long can we keep doing this? Sustainability as a strictly temporal concept," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 7(2), pages 274-287, June.
    14. Sebastian Fredershausen & Henrik Lechte & Mathias Willnat & Tobias Witt & Christine Harnischmacher & Tim-Benjamin Lembcke & Matthias Klumpp & Lutz Kolbe, 2021. "Towards an Understanding of Hydrogen Supply Chains: A Structured Literature Review Regarding Sustainability Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, October.
    15. Peter M. Bednar & Christine Welch, 2020. "Socio-Technical Perspectives on Smart Working: Creating Meaningful and Sustainable Systems," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 281-298, April.
    16. Vladislav Krivda & Jan Petru & David Macha & Jakub Novak, 2021. "Use of Microsimulation Traffic Models as Means for Ensuring Public Transport Sustainability and Accessibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-38, March.
    17. Jasinska-Biliczak Anna, 2020. "Endogenous Innovation Potential: Regional SMEs’ Perspective in Emerging Economies," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(4), pages 435-449.
    18. George P. Moschis & Anil Mathur & Randall Shannon, 2020. "Toward Achieving Sustainable Food Consumption: Insights from the Life Course Paradigm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-18, July.
    19. Nina Lazar & K. Chithra, 2022. "Role of culture in sustainable development and sustainable built environment: a review," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(5), pages 5991-6031, May.
    20. Martina Jelinkova & Libena Tetrevova & Jan Vavra & Simona Munzarova, 2021. "The Sharing Economy in the Context of Sustainable Development and Social Responsibility: The Example of the Czech Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-18, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:17:p:7198-:d:408308. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.