IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i15p6291-d394558.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Evolution of the Kazakhstani Silk Road Section from a Transport into a Logistics Corridor and the Economic Sustainability of Regional Development in Central Asia

Author

Listed:
  • Aislu Taisarinova

    (Faculty of Logistics and Management, Kazakh Academy of Transport and Communications, 97 Shevchenko Street, Almaty 050012, Kazakhstan
    Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, Kazakh-German University, 111 Pushkin Street, Almaty 050010, Kazakhstan)

  • Giuseppe Loprencipe

    (Department of Civil, Constructional and Environmental Engineering, Sapienza University, 18 Via Eudossiana, 00184 Rome, Italy)

  • Madina Junussova

    (Institute of Public Policy and Administration, University of Central Asia, 138 Toktogul Street, Bishkek 720001, Kyrgyzstan)

Abstract

Central Asian countries attract investment in transport infrastructure to rebuild the Silk Road paths and enjoy economic benefits from the participation in international trade. The Kazakhstani government approached the Russian and Chinese governments intending to join the Western Europe–Western China (WE–WC) initiative to boost the country’s regional development. The paper aims to assess how the WE–WC transport corridor affected the economic potential of linking cities and regions starting from the quality of transport infrastructure and leading to their export potential. The study’s findings showed that the Kazakhstan section of the WE–WC corridor was at an early stage of transformation from a transport into an economic corridor. While the Russia-Uzbekistan section continues to serve mainly a transit function and operate at the level of transport infrastructure, the China-Kyrgyzstan section has started evolving from the level of multimode transport corridor to the level of logistics corridor. The economic sustainability of the WE–WC linking mining and agricultural regions of Kazakhstan still comes into question and depends on the government’s further region-specific policy actions.

Suggested Citation

  • Aislu Taisarinova & Giuseppe Loprencipe & Madina Junussova, 2020. "The Evolution of the Kazakhstani Silk Road Section from a Transport into a Logistics Corridor and the Economic Sustainability of Regional Development in Central Asia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-20, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:15:p:6291-:d:394558
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/15/6291/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/15/6291/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jingxin Sun & Zhinong Li & Jiaqiang Lei & Dexiong Teng & Shengyu Li, 2018. "Study on the Relationship between Land Transport and Economic Growth in Xinjiang," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Yuan Li & Hans-Jörg Schmerer, 2017. "Trade and the New Silk Road: opportunities, challenges, and solutions," Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 205-213, July.
    3. Asian Development Bank (ADB), 2014. "CAREC Transport and Trade Facilitation Strategy 2020," ADB Reports RPT146303-3, Asian Development Bank (ADB), revised 17 Mar 2014.
    4. De, Arijit & Mogale, D.G. & Zhang, Mengdi & Pratap, Saurabh & Kumar, Sri Krishna & Huang, George Q., 2020. "Multi-period multi-echelon inventory transportation problem considering stakeholders behavioural tendencies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    5. Jan P. Voon & Xinpeng Xu, 2020. "Impact of the Belt and Road Initiative on China’s soft power: preliminary evidence," Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 120-131, January.
    6. Muhammad Khalil Khan & Imran Ali Sandano & Cornelius B. Pratt & Tahir Farid, 2018. "China’s Belt and Road Initiative: A Global Model for an Evolving Approach to Sustainable Regional Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, November.
    7. Roberts,Mark & Melecky,Martin & Bougna,Theophile & Xu,Yan-000462055, 2018. "Transport corridors and their wider economic benefits : a critical review of the literature," Policy Research Working Paper Series 8302, The World Bank.
    8. Lakshmanan, T.R., 2011. "The broader economic consequences of transport infrastructure investments," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 1-12.
    9. Mohit Goswami & Arijit De & Muhammad Khoirul Khakim Habibi & Yash Daultani, 2020. "Examining freight performance of third-party logistics providers within the automotive industry in India: an environmental sustainability perspective," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(24), pages 7565-7592, December.
    10. Antonio Pantuso & Giuseppe Loprencipe & Guido Bonin & Bagdat Burkhanbaiuly Teltayev, 2019. "Analysis of Pavement Condition Survey Data for Effective Implementation of a Network Level Pavement Management Program for Kazakhstan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, February.
    11. Howard White, 2011. "Achieving high-quality impact evaluation design through mixed methods: the case of infrastructure," Journal of Development Effectiveness, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 131-144.
    12. Fernando Ascensão & Lenore Fahrig & Anthony P. Clevenger & Richard T. Corlett & Jochen A. G. Jaeger & William F. Laurance & Henrique M. Pereira, 2018. "Environmental challenges for the Belt and Road Initiative," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 1(5), pages 206-209, May.
    13. Lobyrev, Vitaly & Tikhomirov, Andrey & Tsukarev, Taras & Vinokurov, Evgeny, 2018. "Belt and Road Transport Corridors: Barriers and Investments," MPRA Paper 86705, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Degong Ma & Chun Lei & Farid Ullah & Raza Ullah & Qadar Bakhsh Baloch, 2019. "China’s One Belt and One Road Initiative and Outward Chinese Foreign Direct Investment in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-13, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alexander Victorovich Petrov & Maria Sergeevna Baynova & Jialihasi Jiaerheng, 2022. "Features of Russian and Chinese Direct Investments in Kazakhstan," Spatial Economics=Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika, Economic Research Institute, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (Khabarovsk, Russia), issue 1, pages 148-167.
    2. Irina Makarova & Azhar Serikkaliyeva & Larysa Gubacheva & Eduard Mukhametdinov & Polina Buyvol & Aleksandr Barinov & Vladimir Shepelev & Gulnaz Mavlyautdinova, 2023. "The Role of Multimodal Transportation in Ensuring Sustainable Territorial Development: Review of Risks and Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-27, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gianmarco Bressanelli & Nicola Saccani & Marco Perona & Irene Baccanelli, 2020. "Towards Circular Economy in the Household Appliance Industry: An Overview of Cases," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-23, November.
    2. Joon-Seok Kim & Nina Shin, 2021. "Planning for Railway Station Network Sustainability Based on Node–Place Analysis of Local Stations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-12, April.
    3. Jaime González-Domínguez & Gonzalo Sánchez-Barroso & Francisco Zamora-Polo & Justo García-Sanz-Calcedo, 2020. "Application of Circular Economy Techniques for Design and Development of Products through Collaborative Project-Based Learning for Industrial Engineer Teaching," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-16, May.
    4. Sara Ezquerro & José Luis Moura & Borja Alonso, 2020. "Illegal Use of Loading Bays and Its Impact on the Use of Public Space," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-16, July.
    5. Alix Vargas & Carmen Fuster & David Corne, 2020. "Towards Sustainable Collaborative Logistics Using Specialist Planning Algorithms and a Gain-Sharing Business Model: A UK Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-29, August.
    6. Fan Chen & Sen Liu & Andrea Appolloni, 2020. "Horizontal Coordination of I-LNGOs in the Humanitarian Supply Chain: An Evolutionary Game Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-21, July.
    7. Mingchun Cao & Ilan Alon, 2020. "Intellectual Structure of the Belt and Road Initiative Research: A Scientometric Analysis and Suggestions for a Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-40, August.
    8. Zhiwen Gong & Fung Chan & Yan Wu, 2021. "Borrowing Hong Kong’s International Standards: A Steppingstone for the Chinese “Belt and Road” Going Out?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, March.
    9. Benjamin Nitsche, 2020. "Decrypting the Belt and Road Initiative: Barriers and Development Paths for Global Logistics Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-23, November.
    10. Schreiner, Lena & Madlener, Reinhard, 2022. "Investing in power grid infrastructure as a flexibility option: A DSGE assessment for Germany," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    11. Sri Astutik & Jürgen Pretzsch & Jude Ndzifon Kimengsi, 2019. "Asian Medicinal Plants’ Production and Utilization Potentials: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-33, October.
    12. Damoah, Kaku Attah & Giovannetti, Giorgia & Marvasi, Enrico, 2022. "Do country centrality and similarity to China matter in the allocation of belt and road projects?," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 660-674.
    13. Paola Di Mascio & Alessio Antonini & Piero Narciso & Antonio Greto & Marco Cipriani & Laura Moretti, 2021. "Proposal and Implementation of a Heliport Pavement Management System: Technical and Economic Comparison of Maintenance Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-12, August.
    14. Redondi, Renato & Birolini, Sebastian & Morlotti, Chiara & Paleari, Stefano, 2021. "Connectivity measures and passengers’ behavior: Comparing conventional connectivity models to predict itinerary market shares," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    15. Wessel, Jan, 2019. "Evaluating the transport-mode-specific trade effects of different transport infrastructure types," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 42-57.
    16. Wenfeng Ge & Xiaodong Yang & Qiying Ran, 2024. "Does Infrastructure Investment Remain an Effective Expansionary Tool? Based On the Green Economy Growth Perspective," Bulletin of Monetary Economics and Banking, Bank Indonesia, vol. 27(1), pages 99-112, March.
    17. Wojciech Rabiega & Artur Gorzałczyński & Robert Jeszke & Paweł Mzyk & Krystian Szczepański, 2021. "How Long Will Combustion Vehicles Be Used? Polish Transport Sector on the Pathway to Climate Neutrality," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-19, November.
    18. Ziaul Haque Munim & Hans-Joachim Schramm, 2018. "The impacts of port infrastructure and logistics performance on economic growth: the mediating role of seaborne trade," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-19, December.
    19. Tomoki Ishikura & Fuga Yokoyama, 2022. "Regional economic effects of the Ring Road project in the Greater Tokyo Area: A spatial CGE approach," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 101(4), pages 811-837, August.
    20. Piotr Rosik & Julia Wójcik, 2022. "Transport Infrastructure and Regional Development: A Survey of Literature on Wider Economic and Spatial Impacts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:15:p:6291-:d:394558. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.