IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i11p4536-d366634.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pork Production Survey to Assess Factors of Facility Design and Operation

Author

Listed:
  • Joseph R. Sanford

    (Department of Biological Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 460 Henry Mall, Madison, WI 53706, USA)

  • Horacio A. Aguirre-Villegas

    (Department of Biological Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 460 Henry Mall, Madison, WI 53706, USA)

  • Rebecca A. Larson

    (Department of Biological Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 460 Henry Mall, Madison, WI 53706, USA)

Abstract

Pork producers can have difficulty operating or expanding existing facilities or establishing new facilities based on perceived negative impacts to the environment and surrounding community. It is critical to understand the characteristics and practices adopted in swine facilities to evaluate the extend of these impacts. A survey, completed by 69 pork producers in Wisconsin, was conducted to assess how facility design and management affect odor, water quality, water consumption, air quality, traffic, and noise. A wide range of production facilities participated in the survey where 29% of respondents were classified as very small (<35 animal units, AU), 16% as small (35–70 AU), 20% as medium (70–300 AU), 23% as large (300–1000 AU), and 12% as permitted (>1000 AU) facilities. Generally, facilities integrated numerous odor control strategies which resulted in high calculated odor scores and the absence of odor complaints. However, the lack of nutrient management planning and other practices for water quality, particularly for facilities with less than 300 AU, indicates there are areas that need improvement. Regardless of facility size, water reduction practices were very commonly reported indicating water conservation is important. Pit ventilation and mechanical ventilation was reported at 58 and 85% of the surveyed facilities, which highlights the need to increase the adoption of mechanical ventilation for air quality, especially in farms with under-barn storage. Using trucks instead of tractors and pumping instead of trucks and tractors can reduce traffic around facilities during manure hauling season.

Suggested Citation

  • Joseph R. Sanford & Horacio A. Aguirre-Villegas & Rebecca A. Larson, 2020. "Pork Production Survey to Assess Factors of Facility Design and Operation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-27, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:11:p:4536-:d:366634
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/11/4536/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/11/4536/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. King, Tom & Schoenau, Jeff & Elliott, Jane, 2017. "Relationship between Manure Management Application Practices and Phosphorus and Nitrogen Export in Snowmelt Run-off Water from a Black Chernozem Saskatchewan Soil," Sustainable Agriculture Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 6(2), May.
    2. Tomer, M.D. & Moorman, T.B. & Kovar, J.L. & Cole, K.J. & Nichols, D.J., 2016. "Eleven years of runoff and phosphorus losses from two fields with and without manure application, Iowa, USA," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 104-111.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elliot Anderson & Keith Schilling & Christopher Jones & Larry Weber & Calvin Wolter, 2024. "Iowa’s Annual Phosphorus Budget: Quantifying the Inputs and Outputs of Phosphorus Transport Processes," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Lourenzi, Cledimar Rogério & Ceretta, Carlos Alberto & Ciancio, Nathalia Haydee Riveros & Tiecher, Tadeu Luis & da Silva, Lincon Oliveira Stefanello & De Conti, Lessandro & Girotto, Eduardo & Ferreira, 2021. "Forms of nitrogen and phosphorus transfer by runoff in soil under no-tillage with successive organic waste and mineral fertilizers applications," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    3. Manyowa N. Meki & Javier M. Osorio & Evelyn M. Steglich & James R. Kiniry, 2022. "Drought-Induced Nitrogen and Phosphorus Carryover Nutrients in Corn/Soybean Rotations in the Upper Mississippi River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-23, November.
    4. Li, Tianyang & Zhang, Yi & He, Binghui & Wu, Xiaoyu & Du, Yingni, 2022. "Nitrate loss by runoff in response to rainfall amount category and different combinations of fertilization and cultivation in sloping croplands," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    5. Sisay A. Belay & Tewodros T. Assefa & P. V. Vara Prasad & Petra Schmitter & Abeyou W. Worqlul & Tammo S. Steenhuis & Manuel R. Reyes & Seifu A. Tilahun, 2020. "The Response of Water and Nutrient Dynamics and of Crop Yield to Conservation Agriculture in the Ethiopian Highlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-15, July.
    6. Zanon, Jair Augusto & Favaretto, Nerilde & Democh Goularte, Gabriel & Dieckow, Jeferson & Barth, Gabriel, 2020. "Manure application at long-term in no-till: Effects on runoff, sediment and nutrients losses in high rainfall events," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:11:p:4536-:d:366634. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.