IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i9p1483-d1477360.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Iowa’s Annual Phosphorus Budget: Quantifying the Inputs and Outputs of Phosphorus Transport Processes

Author

Listed:
  • Elliot Anderson

    (IIHR-Hydroscience & Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA)

  • Keith Schilling

    (IIHR-Hydroscience & Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA)

  • Christopher Jones

    (IIHR-Hydroscience & Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA)

  • Larry Weber

    (IIHR-Hydroscience & Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA)

  • Calvin Wolter

    (IIHR-Hydroscience & Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA)

Abstract

Phosphorus (P) plays an integral part in Iowa’s economic and environmental activities through its role as an essential nutrient and waterborne pollutant. However, the amount of phosphorus transported through these activities has not been well quantified. This study estimates the annual mass of P entering and exiting Iowa’s landscape from 1998 to 2022 through seven transport pathways. Four input pathways (fertilizer application, manure production, industrial sources, and human sources) and three output pathways (harvesting, livestock grazing, and stream export) were quantified using various agricultural, economic, and water quality datasets. We also estimated the total mass of P present in the top 0.61 m layer of Iowa’s landscape using results from a statewide soil sampling survey. The harvest component was the largest, with annual values consistently above 200 million kg. This was followed by the fertilizer and manure components, with annual values near 100 million kg. The other components were much smaller; the mean grazing and stream export values were 15 and 19 million kg, respectively, and human and industrial sources were less than 4 million kg. Stream export was the most dynamic pathway, with the largest coefficient of variation (0.59). The net P budget (inputs–outputs) was negative in 20 of the 25 years assessed, indicating that Iowa typically runs a P deficit. A trend analysis revealed that the manure, human, industry, and harvesting components increased across the 1998–2022 period while the grazing component decreased. The mass of P in Iowa’s top layer of soil was 81.5 billion kg—orders of magnitude larger than any individual budget component. This analysis provides a new perspective on P transport pathways in Iowa and may help inform policymakers as they make decisions on the many activities involving P.

Suggested Citation

  • Elliot Anderson & Keith Schilling & Christopher Jones & Larry Weber & Calvin Wolter, 2024. "Iowa’s Annual Phosphorus Budget: Quantifying the Inputs and Outputs of Phosphorus Transport Processes," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:9:p:1483-:d:1477360
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/9/1483/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/9/1483/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ronald A. Fleming & Bruce Babcock & Erda Wang, 1998. "Resource or Waste? The Economics of Swine Manure Storage and Management," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 20(1), pages 96-113.
    2. Tomer, M.D. & Moorman, T.B. & Kovar, J.L. & Cole, K.J. & Nichols, D.J., 2016. "Eleven years of runoff and phosphorus losses from two fields with and without manure application, Iowa, USA," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 104-111.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kaplan, Jonathan D. & Johansson, Robert C., 2003. "When The !%$? Hits The Land: Implications For Us Agriculture And Environment When Land Application Of Manure Is Constrained," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 22002, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. Sheng Gong & Jason.S. Bergtold & Elizabeth Yeager, 2021. "Assessing the joint adoption and complementarity between in-field conservation practices of Kansas farmers," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 9(1), pages 1-24, December.
    3. Key, Nigel D. & Kaplan, Jonathan D., 2007. "Multiple Environmental Externalities and Manure Management Policy," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 32(1), pages 1-20, April.
    4. Somda, Zana C. & Allison, John R. & Ely, L.O. & Newton, G.L. & Wetzstein, Michael E., 2003. "Economic And Environmental Evaluation Of Dairy Manure Utilization For Year Round Crop Production," 2003 Annual Meeting, February 1-5, 2003, Mobile, Alabama 35167, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    5. Fan, Yubing & McCann, Laura M., 2017. "Farmers’ Adoption of Pressure Irrigation Systems and Scientific Scheduling Practices: An Application of Multilevel Models," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258458, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    6. Key, Nigel D., 2004. "Manure Application Standards and EQIP Payments: The Distribution of Economic and Environmental Costs and Benefits across US Hog Farms," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 19937, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    7. Erich von Stroheim & Dana Loyd Keske Hoag, 2021. "Valuing Cattle Manure as an Agricultural Resource for Efficiency and Environmental Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    8. Metcalfe, Mark R., 2001. "Environmental Regulation And Implications For Competitiveness In International Pork Trade," 2001: International Trade in Livestock Products Symposium, January 2001, Auckland, New Zealand 14565, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    9. Hadrich, Joleen C. & Wolf, Christopher A. & Harsh, Stephen B., 2005. "Optimal livestock diet formulation with farm environmental compliance consequences," 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI 19427, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    10. Fleming, Ronald A., 1998. "Using Setback Requirements As An Economic Incentive To Reduce Livestock Waste Odors," 1998 Annual meeting, August 2-5, Salt Lake City, UT 20838, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    11. Marc Ribaudo & Andrea Cattaneo & Jean Agapoff, 2004. "Cost of Meeting Manure Nutrient Application Standards in Hog Production: The Roles of EQIP and Fertilizer Offsets," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 26(4), pages 430-444.
    12. Azzeddine Azzam & Gibson Nene & Karina Schoengold, 2015. "Hog Industry Structure and the Stringency of Environmental Regulation," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 63(3), pages 333-358, September.
    13. Paudel, Krishna P. & McIntosh, Christopher S., 2000. "Economics Of Poultry Litter Utilization And Optimal Environmental Policy For Phosphorus Disposal In Georgia," Series Reports 23813, Auburn University, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.
    14. Lourenzi, Cledimar Rogério & Ceretta, Carlos Alberto & Ciancio, Nathalia Haydee Riveros & Tiecher, Tadeu Luis & da Silva, Lincon Oliveira Stefanello & De Conti, Lessandro & Girotto, Eduardo & Ferreira, 2021. "Forms of nitrogen and phosphorus transfer by runoff in soil under no-tillage with successive organic waste and mineral fertilizers applications," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    15. Liu, Yazhou & Ji, Yueqing & Shao, Shuai & Zhong, Funing & Zhang, Ning & Chen, Yishan, 2017. "Scale of Production, Agglomeration and Agricultural Pollutant Treatment: Evidence From a Survey in China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 30-45.
    16. Ribaudo, Marc & Agapoff, Jean & Cattaneo, Andrea, 2003. "Can Eqip Be Effective In Helping Farmers Meet Manure Management Goals?," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 22025, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    17. Iho, Antti & Parker, Doug & Zilberman, David, 2015. "Optimal Regional Regulation of Animal Waste," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 211780, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    18. Aillery, Marcel P. & Gollehon, Noel & Breneman, Vincent E., 2005. "Technical Documentation of the Regional Manure Management Model for the Chesapeake Bay Watershed," Technical Bulletins 184315, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    19. Yap, Crystal & Foster, Kenneth A. & Preckel, Paul V. & Doering, Otto C., III, 2001. "The Economic Impacts Of Phosphorus-Based Manure Management Policies On A Representative North Central Indiana Hog-Grain Farm," Staff Papers 28642, Purdue University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    20. Massey, Raymond E. & Gedikoglu, Haluk, 2021. "Manure application rules and environmental considerations," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:9:p:1483-:d:1477360. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.