IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i11p4530-d366533.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk-Based Approach for Informing Sustainable Infrastructure Resilience Enhancement and Potential Resilience Implication in Terms of Emergency Service Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Pawel Gromek

    (The Main School of Fire Service, Institute of Internal Security, Slowackiego 52/54 Street, 01629 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Grzegorz Sobolewski

    (The Main School of Fire Service, Institute of Internal Security, Slowackiego 52/54 Street, 01629 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

Infrastructure resilience ascribes into the United Nations’ agenda for sustainable development. The more information supporting infrastructure resilience enhancement, the higher chance that it will be done objectively and effectively, and especially in a sustainable way. In spite of many different approaches and data sources, there is a lack of information that respects the emergency service point of view. The main research objective is to investigate factors determining sustainable infrastructure resilience enhancement that reflects direct protection of the most important values (human life and health) by connecting multiple variants of infrastructural resilience corresponding with the voice of emergency service and based on real data risk assessment. The methodology consists in formulation of a reference model for informing sustainable infrastructure resilience enhancement, risk assessment for infrastructure safety in terms of emergency service perspective and risk-based rationalization of the enhancement manners. The model stems from urban resilience and city resilience. Its components are physical resilience, structure and setting resilience, organizational resilience, economic resilience and legal resilience. These elements are related to hazards’ character, operational specification and resource requirements, operationalizing the model in terms of emergency conditions. For risk rationalization purpose, 1,255,826 events which occurred in 2015–2019 are analysed. Nearly 70% of the summary value of infrastructural risk is related to residential buildings and other categories of objects (garages, auto repair shops, monuments of material culture, objects of natural environment, hydro-technical objects, military objects, ex-territorial objects and others). Sustainable-related manners are specified notably for abovementioned buildings and objects. Deepening the analysis of cognitive limitations gives ideas for further research.

Suggested Citation

  • Pawel Gromek & Grzegorz Sobolewski, 2020. "Risk-Based Approach for Informing Sustainable Infrastructure Resilience Enhancement and Potential Resilience Implication in Terms of Emergency Service Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-30, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:11:p:4530-:d:366533
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/11/4530/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/11/4530/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Weiping & Yang, Saini & Hu, Fuyu & Stanley, H. Eugene & He, Shuai & Shi, Mimi, 2018. "An approach for cascading effects within critical infrastructure systems," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 510(C), pages 164-177.
    2. Nicholas B. Rajkovich & Yasmein Okour, 2019. "Climate Change Resilience Strategies for the Building Sector: Examining Existing Domains of Resilience Utilized by Design Professionals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, May.
    3. Zoomers, Annelies & van Noorloos, Femke & Otsuki, Kei & Steel, Griet & van Westen, Guus, 2017. "The Rush for Land in an Urbanizing World: From Land Grabbing Toward Developing Safe, Resilient, and Sustainable Cities and Landscapes," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 242-252.
    4. Igor Linkov & Cate Fox‐Lent & Laura Read & Craig R. Allen & James C. Arnott & Emanuele Bellini & Jon Coaffee & Marie‐Valentine Florin & Kirk Hatfield & Iain Hyde & William Hynes & Aleksandar Jovanovic, 2018. "Tiered Approach to Resilience Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(9), pages 1772-1780, September.
    5. Ritsche Anne Kloosterman & Wijnand Veeneman & Jan Peter van der Hoek, 2020. "Sustainable Societal Infrastructures: A Resilient Approach to Prevent Conflicting Claims of Drinking Water and Other Infrastructures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-13, January.
    6. Alexandra Bec & Brent Moyle & Char-lee Moyle, 2018. "Resilient and Sustainable Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, December.
    7. Rehak, David & Senovsky, Pavel & Hromada, Martin & Lovecek, Tomas, 2019. "Complex approach to assessing resilience of critical infrastructure elements," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 125-138.
    8. Darryn McEvoy, 2019. "Climate Resilient Urban Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-4, January.
    9. Cinta Lomba-Fernández & Josune Hernantes & Leire Labaka, 2019. "Guide for Climate-Resilient Cities: An Urban Critical Infrastructures Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-19, August.
    10. Ming Zhong & Kairong Lin & Guoping Tang & Qian Zhang & Yang Hong & Xiaohong Chen, 2020. "A Framework to Evaluate Community Resilience to Urban Floods: A Case Study in Three Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    11. Kameshwar, Sabarethinam & Cox, Daniel T. & Barbosa, Andre R. & Farokhnia, Karim & Park, Hyoungsu & Alam, Mohammad S. & van de Lindt, John W., 2019. "Probabilistic decision-support framework for community resilience: Incorporating multi-hazards, infrastructure interdependencies, and resilience goals in a Bayesian network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    12. Nan, Cen & Sansavini, Giovanni, 2017. "A quantitative method for assessing resilience of interdependent infrastructures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 35-53.
    13. Kyoyoung Hwang & Thorsten Schuetze & Fabrizio M. Amoruso, 2020. "Flood Resilient and Sustainable Urban Regeneration Using the Example of an Industrial Compound Conversion in Seoul, South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-26, January.
    14. Cate Fox-Lent & Matthew E. Bates & Igor Linkov, 2015. "A matrix approach to community resilience assessment: an illustrative case at Rockaway Peninsula," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 209-218, June.
    15. Ritchey, Tom, 2018. "General morphological analysis as a basic scientific modelling method," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 81-91.
    16. Zheng Lu & Ying Zhou & Tony Yang & Angeliki Papalou, 2019. "Special Issue: Resilience and Sustainability of Civil Infrastructures under Extreme Loads," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-3, June.
    17. Bostick, T.P. & Connelly, E.B. & Lambert, J.H. & Linkov, I., 2018. "Resilience science, policy and investment for civil infrastructure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 19-23.
    18. Elizabeth Lawson & Raziyeh Farmani & Ewan Woodley & David Butler, 2020. "A Resilient and Sustainable Water Sector: Barriers to the Operationalisation of Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, February.
    19. Hossain, Niamat Ullah Ibne & Jaradat, Raed & Hosseini, Seyedmohsen & Marufuzzaman, Mohammad & Buchanan, Randy K., 2019. "A framework for modeling and assessing system resilience using a Bayesian network: A case study of an interdependent electrical infrastructure system," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 62-83.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pawel Gromek & Monika Wojakowska, 2021. "To Manage Societal Security in COVID-19: Operational Continuity of Fire Rescue Service in Disaster Conditions," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 833-850.
    2. Guiyuan Li & Guo Cheng & Zhenying Wu & Xiaoxiao Liu, 2022. "Coupling Coordination Research on Disaster-Adapted Resilience of Modern Infrastructure System in the Middle and Lower Section of the Three Gorges Reservoir Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-24, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiansheng Chen & Ruisong Quan, 2021. "A spatiotemporal analysis of urban resilience to the COVID-19 pandemic in the Yangtze River Delta," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 106(1), pages 829-854, March.
    2. Ivo Häring & Mirjam Fehling-Kaschek & Natalie Miller & Katja Faist & Sebastian Ganter & Kushal Srivastava & Aishvarya Kumar Jain & Georg Fischer & Kai Fischer & Jörg Finger & Alexander Stolz & Tobias , 2021. "A performance-based tabular approach for joint systematic improvement of risk control and resilience applied to telecommunication grid, gas network, and ultrasound localization system," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 286-329, June.
    3. R. Cantelmi & G. Di Gravio & R. Patriarca, 2021. "Reviewing qualitative research approaches in the context of critical infrastructure resilience," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 341-376, September.
    4. Mottahedi, Adel & Sereshki, Farhang & Ataei, Mohammad & Qarahasanlou, Ali Nouri & Barabadi, Abbas, 2021. "Resilience estimation of critical infrastructure systems: Application of expert judgment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    5. Adel Mottahedi & Farhang Sereshki & Mohammad Ataei & Ali Nouri Qarahasanlou & Abbas Barabadi, 2021. "The Resilience of Critical Infrastructure Systems: A Systematic Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-32, March.
    6. Xu, Zizhen & Chopra, Shauhrat S., 2022. "Network-based Assessment of Metro Infrastructure with a Spatial–temporal Resilience Cycle Framework," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    7. Trucco, Paolo & Petrenj, Boris, 2023. "Characterisation of resilience metrics in full-scale applications to interdependent infrastructure systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    8. Licia Felicioni & Antonín Lupíšek & Petr Hájek, 2020. "Major European Stressors and Potential of Available Tools for Assessment of Urban and Buildings Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-27, September.
    9. Xiaoge Zhang & Sankaran Mahadevan & Kai Goebel, 2019. "Network Reconfiguration for Increasing Transportation System Resilience Under Extreme Events," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(9), pages 2054-2075, September.
    10. Maddah, Negin & Heydari, Babak, 2024. "Building back better: Modeling decentralized recovery in sociotechnical systems using strategic network dynamics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    11. Poulin, Craig & Kane, Michael B., 2021. "Infrastructure resilience curves: Performance measures and summary metrics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    12. Xu, Peng-Cheng & Lu, Qing-Chang & Xie, Chi & Cheong, Taesu, 2024. "Modeling the resilience of interdependent networks: The role of function dependency in metro and bus systems," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    13. Hoang Long Nguyen & Rajendra Akerkar, 2020. "Modelling, Measuring, and Visualising Community Resilience: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-26, September.
    14. Å arÅ«nienÄ—, Inga & MartiÅ¡auskas, Linas & KrikÅ¡tolaitis, RiÄ ardas & Augutis, Juozas & Setola, Roberto, 2024. "Risk assessment of critical infrastructures: A methodology based on criticality of infrastructure elements," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    15. David Rehak & Simona Slivkova & Heidi Janeckova & Dominika Stuberova & Martin Hromada, 2022. "Strengthening Resilience in the Energy Critical Infrastructure: Methodological Overview," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-14, July.
    16. Zhou, Shenghua & Yang, Yifan & Ng, S. Thomas & Xu, J. Frank & Li, Dezhi, 2020. "Integrating data-driven and physics-based approaches to characterize failures of interdependent infrastructures," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 31(C).
    17. Martin Hromada & David Rehak & Ludek Lukas, 2021. "Resilience Assessment in Electricity Critical Infrastructure from the Point of View of Converged Security," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, March.
    18. Guiyuan Li & Guo Cheng & Zhenying Wu & Xiaoxiao Liu, 2022. "Coupling Coordination Research on Disaster-Adapted Resilience of Modern Infrastructure System in the Middle and Lower Section of the Three Gorges Reservoir Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-24, November.
    19. Zinette Bergman & Manfred Max Bergman, 2022. "Toward Sustainable Communities: A Case Study of the Eastern Market in Detroit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-14, April.
    20. Xinglong Wang & Shangfei Miao & Junqing Tang, 2020. "Vulnerability and Resilience Analysis of the Air Traffic Control Sector Network in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-18, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:11:p:4530-:d:366533. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.