IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i10p3947-d356831.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Engineering Education for Sustainable Development: Evaluation Criteria for Brazilian Context

Author

Listed:
  • Izabela Simon Rampasso

    (Laboratory of Technology, Business and Environment Management (LATEC), Federal Fluminense University, Passo da Pátria Street, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro 24210-240, Brazil
    School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Campinas, Mendeleyev Street, Campinas, São Paulo 13083-970, Brazil)

  • Osvaldo L. G. Quelhas

    (Laboratory of Technology, Business and Environment Management (LATEC), Federal Fluminense University, Passo da Pátria Street, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro 24210-240, Brazil)

  • Rosley Anholon

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Campinas, Mendeleyev Street, Campinas, São Paulo 13083-970, Brazil)

  • Marcio B. Pereira

    (Laboratory of Technology, Business and Environment Management (LATEC), Federal Fluminense University, Passo da Pátria Street, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro 24210-240, Brazil)

  • Jocimar D. A. Miranda

    (Laboratory of Technology, Business and Environment Management (LATEC), Federal Fluminense University, Passo da Pátria Street, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro 24210-240, Brazil)

  • Wenderson S. Alvarenga

    (Laboratory of Technology, Business and Environment Management (LATEC), Federal Fluminense University, Passo da Pátria Street, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro 24210-240, Brazil)

Abstract

Considering the increasing importance of sustainability in future professionals’ education and the role played by engineers in society, this paper aims to analyze the key criteria that should be considered in models to evaluate the insertion level of sustainability into engineering education, considering the Brazilian context. For this, criteria reported in the literature were collected and evaluated by engineering professors. The respondents were asked to classify the criteria as “essential”, “useful, but not essential”, or “not necessary”. Data collected were analyzed through Lawshe’s method. From 15 criteria collected from the literature, 5 were not considered essential to evaluate engineering education for sustainable development (EESD), according to data analysis: C2 (establishment of global partnerships), C4 (encouraging students to volunteer through extracurricular activities), C9 (use of active learning approaches to problem solving to teach aspects related to sustainability), C10 (use of service-learning towards the local community for educational purposes) and C15 (use of sustainability concept in university installations). It was possible to verify that most of these criteria (C2, C4, C10, and C15) were not directly related to engineering curricula, being parallel activities. Regarding C9, active learning approaches can enhance attributes important for students in the context of sustainable development, but they are not goals of EESD. This research contributes to the development of evaluation models for engineering education in the Brazilian context and its findings can also be useful for studies in other countries. No similar study was found in the literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Izabela Simon Rampasso & Osvaldo L. G. Quelhas & Rosley Anholon & Marcio B. Pereira & Jocimar D. A. Miranda & Wenderson S. Alvarenga, 2020. "Engineering Education for Sustainable Development: Evaluation Criteria for Brazilian Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-11, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:10:p:3947-:d:356831
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/10/3947/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/10/3947/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhiliang Huang & Annan Peng & Tongguang Yang & Shuguang Deng & Yuexia He, 2020. "A Design-Based Learning Approach for Fostering Sustainability Competency in Engineering Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Nowotny, Janusz & Dodson, John & Fiechter, Sebastian & Gür, Turgut M. & Kennedy, Brendan & Macyk, Wojciech & Bak, Tadeusz & Sigmund, Wolfgang & Yamawaki, Michio & Rahman, Kazi A., 2018. "Towards global sustainability: Education on environmentally clean energy technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2541-2551.
    3. José Felipe Figueiredo Barata & Osvaldo Luiz Gonçalves Quelhas & Helder Gomes Costa & Ruben Huamanchumo Gutierrez & Valdir De Jesus Lameira & Marcelo J. Meiriño, 2014. "Multi-Criteria Indicator for Sustainability Rating in Suppliers of the Oil and Gas Industries in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-22, February.
    4. Luis Roberto Arruda & Valdir De Jesus Lameira & Osvaldo Luiz Gonçalves Quelhas & Fernando Neves Pereira, 2013. "Sustainability in the Brazilian Heavy Construction Industry: An Analysis of Organizational Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(10), pages 1-17, September.
    5. Mulder, Karel F., 2017. "Strategic competences for concrete action towards sustainability: An oxymoron? Engineering education for a sustainable future," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P2), pages 1106-1111.
    6. Vitor W. B. Martins & Rosley Anholon & Osvaldo L. G. Quelhas & Walter Leal Filho, 2019. "Sustainable Practices in Logistics Systems: An Overview of Companies in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-12, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bao, Tiantian & Liu, Yifan & Yang, Zhongzhen & Wu, Shanhua & Yan, Zhenli, 2024. "Evaluating sustainable service quality in higher education from a multi-stakeholder perspective: An integrated fuzzy group decision-making method," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    2. Carlos Cacciuttolo & Yaneth Vásquez & Deyvis Cano & Fernando Valenzuela, 2023. "Research Thesis for Undergraduate Engineering Programs in the Digitalization Era: Learning Strategies and Responsible Research Conduct Road to a University Education 4.0 Paradigm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-27, July.
    3. Fei Chuan Chen & Yi Hwan Shyr, 2021. "Enhance Volunteering Education Through Overseas Volunteer Service," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    4. Carlos Ocampo-López & Fabio Castrillón-Hernández & Hader Alzate-Gil, 2022. "Implementation of Integrative Projects as a Contribution to the Major Design Experience in Chemical Engineering," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-11, May.
    5. Yifan Liu & Tiantian Bao & Dan Zhao & Huiyun Sang & Benwei Fu, 2022. "Evaluation of Student-Perceived Service Quality in Higher Education for Sustainable Development: A Fuzzy TODIM-ERA Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-21, April.
    6. Patrycja Hąbek & Magdalena Palacz & Fizza Saeed, 2024. "Embedding Sustainability into Mechanical Engineering Master Programs—A Case Study of the Top Technical Universities in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-21, January.
    7. Paula M. Castro & Ana Ares-Pernas & Adriana Dapena, 2020. "Service-Learning Projects in University Degrees Based on Sustainable Development Goals: Proposals and Results," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-23, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hazem Ali & Ting Chen & Yunhong Hao, 2021. "Sustainable Manufacturing Practices, Competitive Capabilities, and Sustainable Performance: Moderating Role of Environmental Regulations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    2. Arkadiusz Adamczyk, 2020. "Sizing and Control Algorithms of a Hybrid Energy Storage System Based on Fuel Cells," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-15, October.
    3. Chen, Liming & Zhao, Yuanyuan & Xie, Rui & Su, Bin & Liu, Yue & Renfei, Xv, 2023. "Embodied energy intensity of global high energy consumption industries: A case study of the construction industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    4. Hisham Alidrisi, 2021. "The Development of an Efficiency-Based Global Green Manufacturing Innovation Index: An Input-Oriented DEA Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-11, November.
    5. Segantin, Stefano & Testoni, Raffaella & Zucchetti, Massimo, 2019. "The lifetime determination of ARC reactor as a load-following plant in the energy framework," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 66-75.
    6. Fabricio Carlos Schmidt & Roselaine Ruviaro Zanini & André Luis Korzenowski & Reno Schmidt Junior & Karl Benchimol Xavier do Nascimento, 2018. "Evaluation of Sustainability Practices in Small and Medium-Sized Manufacturing Enterprises in Southern Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-11, July.
    7. Talan, Amogh & Rao, Amar & Sharma, Gagan Deep & Apostu, Simona-Andreea & Abbas, Shujaat, 2023. "Transition towards clean energy consumption in G7: Can financial sector, ICT and democracy help?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    8. Balamuralithara Balakrishnan & Fumihiko Tochinai & Hidekazu Kanemitsu, 2020. "Perceptions and Attitudes towards Sustainable Development among Malaysian Undergraduates," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 9(1), pages 1-44, February.
    9. Valentina Ndou, 2021. "Social Entrepreneurship Education: A Combination of Knowledge Exploitation and Exploration Processes," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, October.
    10. Dolci, Décio Bittencourt & Lunardi, Guilherme Lerch & Salles, Ana Carolina & Alves, Ana Paula Ferreira, 2015. "Implementação da TI Verde nas organizações: uma visão estruturacional," RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil), vol. 55(5), September.
    11. Alice Vasconcelos Nobre & Caio Cézar Rodrigues Oliveira & Denilson Ricardo de Lucena Nunes & André Cristiano Silva Melo & Gil Eduardo Guimarães & Rosley Anholon & Vitor William Batista Martins, 2022. "Analysis of Decision Parameters for Route Plans and Their Importance for Sustainability: An Exploratory Study Using the TOPSIS Technique," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-12, May.
    12. E. Shvarts & A. Pakhalov & A. Knizhnikov & L. Ametistova, 2018. "Environmental rating of oil and gas companies in Russia: How assessment affects environmental transparency and performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(7), pages 1023-1038, November.
    13. Nunzia Capobianco & Vincenzo Basile & Francesca Loia & Roberto Vona, 2021. "Toward a Sustainable Decommissioning of Offshore Platforms in the Oil and Gas Industry: A PESTLE Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, June.
    14. Barbiero, Tommaso & Grillenzoni, Carlo, 2019. "A statistical analysis of the energy effectiveness of building refurbishment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    15. Nomeda Dobrovolskienė & Anastasija Pozniak & Manuela Tvaronavičienė, 2021. "Assessment of the Sustainability of a Real Estate Project Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, April.
    16. Klaudia Zwolińska & Sylwia Lorenc & Radosław Pomykała, 2022. "Sustainable Development in Education from Students’ Perspective—Implementation of Sustainable Development in Curricula," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-27, March.
    17. Zeng, Qingrui & Hafeez, Muhammad & Sher, Falak & Ullah, Sana, 2024. "Environmental higher education, formal finance, energy security risk, and renewable energy investment in China: An aggregate and disaggregate analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    18. Feiyan Han & Daming Wang & Bo Li, 2019. "Spillover Effects of Ports and Logistics Development on Economic Power: Evidence from the Chinese BTH Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-17, August.
    19. Tomasz Rokicki & Aleksandra Perkowska & Bogdan Klepacki & Hubert Szczepaniuk & Edyta Karolina Szczepaniuk & Stanisław Bereziński & Paulina Ziółkowska, 2020. "The Importance of Higher Education in the EU Countries in Achieving the Objectives of the Circular Economy in the Energy Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-17, August.
    20. Luo, Xilin & Duan, Huiming & He, Leiyuhang, 2020. "A Novel Riccati Equation Grey Model And Its Application In Forecasting Clean Energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:10:p:3947-:d:356831. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.