IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i9p2610-d228737.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Management of Banana Xanthomonas Wilt: Evidence from Impact of Adoption of Cultural Control Practices in Uganda

Author

Listed:
  • Enoch M. Kikulwe

    (Bioversity International, P.O. Box 24384, Kampala, Uganda)

  • Joseph Lule Kyanjo

    (Department of Agribusiness and Natural Resource Economics, School of Agricultural Sciences, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda)

  • Edward Kato

    (International Food Policy Research Institute, 1201 I St NW Eye Street, NW, Washington, DC 20005, USA)

  • Reuben T. Ssali

    (National Agricultural Laboratories Research Institute, P.O. Box 7084, Kampala, Uganda)

  • Rockefeller Erima

    (National Agricultural Laboratories Research Institute, P.O. Box 7084, Kampala, Uganda)

  • Samuel Mpiira

    (National Agricultural Laboratories Research Institute, P.O. Box 7084, Kampala, Uganda)

  • Walter Ocimati

    (Bioversity International, P.O. Box 24384, Kampala, Uganda)

  • William Tinzaara

    (Bioversity International, P.O. Box 24384, Kampala, Uganda)

  • Jerome Kubiriba

    (National Agricultural Laboratories Research Institute, P.O. Box 7084, Kampala, Uganda)

  • Elisabetta Gotor

    (Bioversity International, Via dei Tre Denari, 472/a, 00054 Maccarese RM, Italy)

  • Dietmar Stoian

    (Bioversity International, Parc Scientifique Agropolis II, CEDEX 5, 34397 Montpellier, France)

  • Eldad Karamura

    (Bioversity International, P.O. Box 24384, Kampala, Uganda)

Abstract

Banana Xanthomonas Wilt (BXW) is an important emerging and non-curable infectious plant pathogen in sub-Saharan Africa that can cause up to 100% yield loss, negatively impacting sustainable access to food and income to more than 100 million banana farmers. This study disentangles adopters into partial and full adopters to investigate the factors that are relevant to sustain the adoption process of BXW control practices and quantifies the impact of adopting the practices. Data from a randomly selected sample of 1200 banana farmers in Uganda where the disease is endemic was used. A multinomial logit model was used to determine the factors affecting adoption of control practices and augmented inverse probability weighting was employed to estimate the impacts of adoption on banana productivity and sales. Results show that training a woman farmer and having diverse sources of information about BXW control practices increased adoption of the control practices and reduced the disease incidences. Farmers who adopted all the recommended control practices achieved significantly the highest values of banana production and sales. We conclude that improving information access through farmers’ preferred communication channels, having women-inclusive trainings, and a combination of cultural practices are effective ways for sustaining adoption of the control practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Enoch M. Kikulwe & Joseph Lule Kyanjo & Edward Kato & Reuben T. Ssali & Rockefeller Erima & Samuel Mpiira & Walter Ocimati & William Tinzaara & Jerome Kubiriba & Elisabetta Gotor & Dietmar Stoian & El, 2019. "Management of Banana Xanthomonas Wilt: Evidence from Impact of Adoption of Cultural Control Practices in Uganda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-18, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:9:p:2610-:d:228737
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/9/2610/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/9/2610/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simtowe, Franklin & Kassie, Menale & Asfaw, Solomon & Shiferaw, Bekele A. & Monyo, Emmanuel & Siambi, Moses, 2012. "Welfare Effects of Agricultural Technology adoption: the case of improved groundnut varieties in rural Malawi," 2012 Conference, August 18-24, 2012, Foz do Iguacu, Brazil 126761, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Davis, K. & Nkonya, E. & Kato, E. & Mekonnen, D.A. & Odendo, M. & Miiro, R. & Nkuba, J., 2012. "Impact of Farmer Field Schools on Agricultural Productivity and Poverty in East Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 402-413.
    3. Zhiqiang Tan, 2010. "Bounded, efficient and doubly robust estimation with inverse weighting," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 97(3), pages 661-682.
    4. Matias D. Cattaneo & David M. Drukker & Ashley D. Holland, 2013. "Estimation of multivalued treatment effects under conditional independence," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 13(3), pages 407-450, September.
    5. Huber, Martin & Lechner, Michael & Wunsch, Conny, 2010. "How to Control for Many Covariates? Reliable Estimators Based on the Propensity Score," IZA Discussion Papers 5268, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    6. Juliet Nakakawa & Joseph Y. T. Mugisha & Michael W. Shaw & William Tinzaara & Eldad Karamura, 2017. "Banana Xanthomonas Wilt Infection: The Role of Debudding and Roguing as Control Options within a Mixed Cultivar Plantation," International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-13, December.
    7. Cattaneo, Matias D., 2010. "Efficient semiparametric estimation of multi-valued treatment effects under ignorability," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 155(2), pages 138-154, April.
    8. Lechner, Michael, 1999. "Identification and Estimation of Causal Effects of Multiple Treatments Under the Conditional Independence Assumption," IZA Discussion Papers 91, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    9. Nakano, Yuko & Tsusaka, Takuji W. & Aida, Takeshi & Pede, Valerien O., 2015. "The Impact of Training on Technology Adoption and Productivity of Rice Farming in Tanzania: Is Farmer-to-Farmer Extension Effective?," Working Papers 90, JICA Research Institute.
    10. Asfaw, Solomon & Shiferaw, Bekele & Simtowe, Franklin & Lipper, Leslie, 2012. "Impact of modern agricultural technologies on smallholder welfare: Evidence from Tanzania and Ethiopia," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 283-295.
    11. Bagamba, Fredrick & Burger, Kees & Kuyvenhoven, Arie, 2007. "Determinants of smallholder farmer labour allocation decisions in Uganda," 106th Seminar, October 25-27, 2007, Montpellier, France 7920, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    12. S. Derya Uysal, 2015. "Doubly Robust Estimation of Causal Effects with Multivalued Treatments: An Application to the Returns to Schooling," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(5), pages 763-786, August.
    13. Guido W. Imbens, 2004. "Nonparametric Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Under Exogeneity: A Review," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 86(1), pages 4-29, February.
    14. Dan Pan, 2014. "The Impact of Agricultural Extension on Farmer Nutrient Management Behavior in Chinese Rice Production: A Household-Level Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(10), pages 1-22, September.
    15. Matias D. Cattaneo, 2010. "multi-valued treatment effects," The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics,, Palgrave Macmillan.
    16. Sascha O. Becker & Andrea Ichino, 2002. "Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 2(4), pages 358-377, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tiziana Pagnani & Elisabetta Gotor & Enoch Kikulwe & Francesco Caracciolo, 2021. "Livelihood assets’ influence on Ugandan farmers’ control practices for Banana Xanthomonas Wilt (BXW)," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 9(1), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Gemeda, Birhanu & Tesfaye, Getaneh & Simachew, Addis & Wang, Aijie & Mekonnen, Addisu & Guadie, Awoke & Andualem, Berhanu, 2023. "Linking indigenous with scientific knowledge about enset (Ensete ventricosum) disease management in Gamo highlands of Ethiopia: Evidence from local people response, soil physicochemical and microbial ," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    3. Esther Gloria Mbabazi & Enoch M. Kikulwe & Joseph Lule Kyanjo & Nasser Mulumba & Edward Kato & Elisabetta Gotor, 2024. "Has Continued Exposure to Banana Xanthomonas Wilt Worsened Farmers’ Welfare Over Time? Evidence From Banana-Producing Households in Uganda," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(11), pages 1-11, April.
    4. Lucy Mulugo & Paul Kibwika & Florence Birungi Kyazze & Aman Omondi Bonaventure & Enoch Kikulwe, 2022. "The contestations of diversity, culture and commercialization: why tissue culture technology alone cannot solve the banana Xanthomonas wilt problem in central Uganda," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(3), pages 1141-1158, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Farrell, Max H., 2015. "Robust inference on average treatment effects with possibly more covariates than observations," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 189(1), pages 1-23.
    2. Katie Meara & Francesco Pastore & Allan Webster, 2020. "The gender pay gap in the USA: a matching study," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 33(1), pages 271-305, January.
    3. Sokbae Lee & Ryo Okui & Yoon†Jae Whang, 2017. "Doubly robust uniform confidence band for the conditional average treatment effect function," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(7), pages 1207-1225, November.
    4. Beliyou Haile & Carlo Azzarri & Cleo Roberts & David J. Spielman, 2017. "Targeting, bias, and expected impact of complex innovations on developing-country agriculture: evidence from Malawi," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 48(3), pages 317-326, May.
    5. Roberto ESPOSTI, 2014. "To match, not to match, how to match: Estimating the farm-level impact of the CAP-first pillar reform (or: How to Apply Treatment-Effect Econometrics when the Real World is;a Mess)," Working Papers 403, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.
    6. Meara, Katie & Pastore, Francesco & Webster, Allan, 2017. "Is the gender pay gap in the US just the result of gender segregation at work?," GLO Discussion Paper Series 40, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    7. Greco, Marco & Germani, Francesca & Grimaldi, Michele & Radicic, Dragana, 2022. "Policy mix or policy mess? Effects of cross-instrumental policy mix on eco-innovation in German firms," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    8. Tobias A. Jopp, 2018. "On the economics of forced labour. Did the employment of Prisoners-of-War depress German coal mining productivity in World War I?," Working Papers 0132, European Historical Economics Society (EHES).
    9. Long, Wenjin & Pang, Xiaopeng & Dong, Xiao-yuan & Zeng, Junxia, 2020. "Is rented accommodation a good choice for primary school students' academic performance? – Evidence from rural China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    10. Zetterqvist, Johan & Waernbaum, Ingeborg, 2020. "Semi-parametric estimation of multi-valued treatment effects for the treated:estimating equations and sandwich estimators," Working Paper Series 2020:4, IFAU - Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy.
    11. Esposti, Roberto, 2014. "The Impact of the 2005 CAP-First Pillar Reform as a Multivalued Treatment Effect -Alternative Estimation Approaches," 2014 Third Congress, June 25-27, 2014, Alghero, Italy 173005, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA).
    12. Wanglin Ma & Alan Renwick & Kathryn Bicknell, 2018. "Higher Intensity, Higher Profit? Empirical Evidence from Dairy Farming in New Zealand," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 69(3), pages 739-755, September.
    13. Garbero, A. & Songsermsawas, T., 2018. "IFAD RESEARCH SERIES 31 - Impact of modern irrigation on household production and welfare outcomes: evidence from the participatory small-scale irrigation development programme (PASIDP) project in Eth," IFAD Research Series 280080, International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD).
    14. Essilfie, Felix Larry, 2018. "Varietal seed technology and household income of maize farmers: An application of the doubly robust model," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 85-91.
    15. Revilla, Elena & Rodríguez-Prado, Beatriz, 2018. "Bulding ambidexterity through creativity mechanisms: Contextual drivers of innovation success," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(9), pages 1611-1625.
    16. Hong, Yan-Zhen & Chang, Hung-Hao & Dai, Yong-Wu, 2018. "Is deregulation of forest land use rights transactions associated with economic well-being and labor allocation of farm households? Empirical evidence in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 694-701.
    17. W K Newey & S Stouli, 2022. "Heterogeneous coefficients, control variables and identification of multiple treatment effects [Multivalued treatments and decomposition analysis: An application to the WIA program]," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 109(3), pages 865-872.
    18. Chunrong Ai & Oliver Linton & Kaiji Motegi & Zheng Zhang, 2021. "A unified framework for efficient estimation of general treatment models," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 12(3), pages 779-816, July.
    19. Kere, Eric Nazindigouba & Choumert, Johanna & Combes Motel, Pascale & Combes, Jean Louis & Santoni, Olivier & Schwartz, Sonia, 2017. "Addressing Contextual and Location Biases in the Assessment of Protected Areas Effectiveness on Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazônia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 148-158.
    20. Garbero, Alessandra & Songsermsawas, Tisorn, 2016. "Impact of modern irrigation on household production and welfare outcomes: Evidence from the PASIDP project in Ethiopia," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235949, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:9:p:2610-:d:228737. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.