IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i8p2424-d225483.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pakchoi Antioxidant Improvement and Differential Rhizobacterial Community Composition under Organic Fertilization

Author

Listed:
  • Jianli Liao

    (Key Laboratory of Urban Agriculture (South), Ministry of Agriculture, School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China)

  • Jun Ye

    (Australian Centre for Ecogenomics, School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia)

  • Yun Liang

    (Key Laboratory of Urban Agriculture (South), Ministry of Agriculture, School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China)

  • Muhammad Khalid

    (Key Laboratory of Urban Agriculture (South), Ministry of Agriculture, School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China)

  • Danfeng Huang

    (Key Laboratory of Urban Agriculture (South), Ministry of Agriculture, School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China)

Abstract

A high level of antioxidants in organic-produced vegetables has been attributed to soil conditions; however, little is known about the relationships between antioxidants and rhizobacteria under different fertilization treatments. A pot trial for pakchoi ( Brassica campestris ssp. chinensis L.) was conducted under greenhouse conditions with: (1) control; (2) chemical fertilizer; and (3) organic fertilizer. The responses of the plant, soil properties, and rhizobacterial community were measured after 45 days of cultivation. Fertilization increased soil nutrient levels and pakchoi productivity and the reshaped rhizobacterial community structure, while no differences in rhizobacterial abundance and total diversity were observed. Generally, most plant antioxidants were negatively correlated with inorganic nitrogen (N) and positively correlated to organic N in soil. The genera of Arthrospira and Acutodesmus contained differential rhizobacteria under chemical fertilizer treatment, which are known as copiotrophs. In addition, the addition of a chemical fertilizer may stimulate organic substance turnover by the enrichment of organic compound degraders (e.g., Microbacterium and Chitinophaga ) and the promotion of predicted functional pathways involved in energy metabolism. Several beneficial rhizobacteria were associated with organic fertilizer amended rhizosphere including the genera Bacillus , Mycobacterium , Actinomycetospora , and Frankia . Furthermore, Bacillus spp. were positively correlated with plant biomass and phenolic acid. Moreover, predictive functional profiles of the rhizobacterial community involved in amino acid metabolism and lipid metabolism were significantly increased under organic fertilization, which were positively correlated with plant antioxidant activity. Overall, our study suggests that the short-term application of chemical and organic fertilizers reshapes the rhizobacterial community structure, and such changes might contribute to the plant’s performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Jianli Liao & Jun Ye & Yun Liang & Muhammad Khalid & Danfeng Huang, 2019. "Pakchoi Antioxidant Improvement and Differential Rhizobacterial Community Composition under Organic Fertilization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:8:p:2424-:d:225483
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/8/2424/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/8/2424/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Derek S. Lundberg & Sarah L. Lebeis & Sur Herrera Paredes & Scott Yourstone & Jase Gehring & Stephanie Malfatti & Julien Tremblay & Anna Engelbrektson & Victor Kunin & Tijana Glavina del Rio & Robert , 2012. "Defining the core Arabidopsis thaliana root microbiome," Nature, Nature, vol. 488(7409), pages 86-90, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giuseppe Malgioglio & Giulio Flavio Rizzo & Sebastian Nigro & Vincent Lefebvre du Prey & Joelle Herforth-Rahmé & Vittoria Catara & Ferdinando Branca, 2022. "Plant-Microbe Interaction in Sustainable Agriculture: The Factors That May Influence the Efficacy of PGPM Application," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-28, February.
    2. Tonjock Rosemary Kinge & Soumya Ghosh & Errol D. Cason & Marieka Gryzenhout, 2022. "Characterization of the Endophytic Mycobiome in Cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata ) from a Single Location Using Illumina Sequencing," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, February.
    3. Lilan Lu & Chaoqun Tong & Yingying Liu & Weibo Yang, 2024. "Analysis of Physicochemical Properties, Enzyme Activity, Microbial Diversity in Rhizosphere Soil of Coconut ( Cocos nucifera L.) Under Organic and Chemical Fertilizers, Irrigation Conditions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-27, October.
    4. Jake M. Robinson & Jacob G. Mills & Martin F. Breed, 2018. "Walking Ecosystems in Microbiome-Inspired Green Infrastructure: An Ecological Perspective on Enhancing Personal and Planetary Health," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-15, November.
    5. Luigi Russi & Gianpiero Marconi & Nicoletta Ferradini & Beatrice Farda & Marika Pellegrini & Loretta Pace, 2022. "Investigating Population Genetic Diversity and Rhizosphere Microbiota of Central Apennines’ Artemisia eriantha," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-14, September.
    6. Amrita Gupta & Udai B. Singh & Pramod K. Sahu & Surinder Paul & Adarsh Kumar & Deepti Malviya & Shailendra Singh & Pandiyan Kuppusamy & Prakash Singh & Diby Paul & Jai P. Rai & Harsh V. Singh & Madhab, 2022. "Linking Soil Microbial Diversity to Modern Agriculture Practices: A Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-29, March.
    7. Ying Wang & Mei Wang & Zhen’an Yang & Yalin Jiao & Guangming Chu, 2022. "Dominant Fungal Communities Aggregate in the Shallow Rhizosphere Soil of Anabasis aphylla," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-14, November.
    8. Carla L. Abán & Giovanni Larama & Antonella Ducci & Jorgelina Huidobro & Michel Abanto & Silvina Vargas-Gil & Carolina Pérez-Brandan, 2022. "Soil Properties and Bacterial Communities Associated with the Rhizosphere of the Common Bean after Using Brachiaria brizantha as a Service Crop: A 10-Year Field Experiment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, December.
    9. Nicholas Ozede Igiehon & Olubukola Oluranti Babalola, 2018. "Rhizosphere Microbiome Modulators: Contributions of Nitrogen Fixing Bacteria towards Sustainable Agriculture," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-25, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:8:p:2424-:d:225483. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.