IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i8p2212-d222280.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovation in Road Freight Transport: Quantifying the Environmental Performance of Operational Cost-Reducing Practices

Author

Listed:
  • Valentin Carlan

    (Department of Transport and Regional Economics, University of Antwerp, Prinsstraat 13, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium)

  • Christa Sys

    (Department of Transport and Regional Economics, University of Antwerp, Prinsstraat 13, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium)

  • Thierry Vanelslander

    (Department of Transport and Regional Economics, University of Antwerp, Prinsstraat 13, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium)

Abstract

Road transportation is a key mode of transport when it comes to ensuring the hinterland connection of most European ports. Constrained by low profit margins and having to be active in a highly competitive market, companies active in this sector seek multi-dimensional innovative solutions that lower their operational costs. These innovative initiatives also yield positive environmental effects. The latter however are poorly recognized. This paper investigates the characteristics of different types of chassis used to transport containers from and to the terminals in the port areas and looks into the details of operational planning practices. It analyses the cost-effectiveness of these innovative solutions highlighting both the costs and the environmental emissions they save. Transport data from a road hauler serving the hinterland connection of a port in Western Europe is used to build up a case study. Results show that by using special types of chassis, which enable the combination of transport tasks in round-trips, the operational costs are reduced by 25% to 35%, and equally the CO 2 emissions are also decreased by 34% to 38%.

Suggested Citation

  • Valentin Carlan & Christa Sys & Thierry Vanelslander, 2019. "Innovation in Road Freight Transport: Quantifying the Environmental Performance of Operational Cost-Reducing Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-26, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:8:p:2212-:d:222280
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/8/2212/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/8/2212/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Song, Dong-Ping & Dong, Jing-Xin, 2011. "Effectiveness of an empty container repositioning policy with flexible destination ports," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 92-101, January.
    2. Frémont, Antoine & Franc, Pierre, 2010. "Hinterland transportation in Europe: Combined transport versus road transport," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 548-556.
    3. Int Panis, L. & Beckx, C. & Broekx, S. & De Vlieger, I. & Schrooten, L. & Degraeuwe, B. & Pelkmans, L., 2011. "PM, NOx and CO2 emission reductions from speed management policies in Europe," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 32-37, January.
    4. Wang, Michael Q., 2004. "Examining cost effectiveness of mobile source emission control measures," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 155-169, April.
    5. Kok, Robert & Annema, Jan Anne & van Wee, Bert, 2011. "Cost-effectiveness of greenhouse gas mitigation in transport: A review of methodological approaches and their impact," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(12), pages 7776-7793.
    6. Nealer, Rachael & Matthews, H. Scott & Hendrickson, Chris, 2012. "Assessing the energy and greenhouse gas emissions mitigation effectiveness of potential US modal freight policies," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 588-601.
    7. Rangel, Thais & Vassallo, José Manuel & Arenas, Blanca, 2012. "Effectiveness of safety-based incentives in Public Private Partnerships: Evidence from the case of Spain," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(8), pages 1166-1176.
    8. Piecyk, Maja I. & McKinnon, Alan C., 2010. "Forecasting the carbon footprint of road freight transport in 2020," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 31-42, November.
    9. Stewart, Mark G. & Mueller, John, 2014. "Cost-benefit analysis of airport security: Are airports too safe?," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 19-28.
    10. GERARD, Ghillain & STRUYF, Els & SYS, Christa & VAN DE VOORDE, Eddy & VANELSLANDER, Thierry, 2015. "Congestiekost voor wegvervoer: Ontwikkeling generiek model en toepassing voor Vlaanderen," Working Papers 2015008, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    11. Klemick, Heather & Kopits, Elizabeth & Wolverton, Ann & Sargent, Keith, 2015. "Heavy-duty trucking and the energy efficiency paradox: Evidence from focus groups and interviews," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 154-166.
    12. Antoine Frémont & Pierre Franc, 2010. "Hinterland transportation in Europe: Combined transport versus road transport," Post-Print hal-00542346, HAL.
    13. Liu, Wei & Yin, Yafeng & Yang, Hai, 2015. "Effectiveness of variable speed limits considering commuters’ long-term response," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 498-519.
    14. Thierry Vanelslander & Christa Sys & Jasmine Siu Lee Lam & Claudio Ferrari & Athena Roumboutsos & Michele Acciaro & Rosario Macário & Genevieve Giuliano, 2019. "A serving innovation typology: mapping port-related innovations," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(5), pages 611-629, September.
    15. Nakamura, H., 2000. "The economic evaluation of transport infrastructure: needs for international comparisons," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 7(1), pages 3-6, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ryszard K. Miler & Marcin J. Kisielewski & Anna Brzozowska & Antonina Kalinichenko, 2020. "Efficiency of Telematics Systems in Management of Operational Activities in Road Transport Enterprises," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-21, September.
    2. György Kovács, 2023. "Development of New Mathematical Methods and Software Applications for More Efficient and Sustainable Road Freight Transportation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-20, November.
    3. Sears, Sean & Moataz, Mohamed & Ferguson, Mark & Razavi, Saiedeh & Páez, Antonio, 2022. "Perceived barriers to the movement of goods in Canada: A grounded theory investigation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 27-45.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Verena Maria Stockhammer & Sarah Pfoser & Karin Markvica & Jürgen Zajicek & Matthias Prandtstetter, 2021. "Behavioural Biases Distorting the Demand for Environmentally Friendly Freight Transport Modes: An Overview and Potential Measures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-34, October.
    2. Qian Dai & Jiaqi Yang & Dong Li, 2018. "Modeling a Three-Mode Hybrid Port-Hinterland Freight Intermodal Distribution Network with Environmental Consideration: The Case of the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-26, August.
    3. Erica Varese & Danilo Stefano Marigo & Mariarosaria Lombardi, 2020. "Dry Port: A Review on Concept, Classification, Functionalities and Technological Processes," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-16, November.
    4. Álvarez-SanJaime, Óscar & Cantos-Sánchez, Pedro & Moner-Colonques, Rafael & Sempere-Monerris, José J., 2015. "The impact on port competition of the integration of port and inland transport services," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 291-302.
    5. Panagiotis Ypsilantis & Rob Zuidwijk, 2019. "Collaborative Fleet Deployment and Routing for Sustainable Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-26, October.
    6. Zheng, Jianfeng & Yang, Dong, 2016. "Hub-and-spoke network design for container shipping along the Yangtze River," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 51-57.
    7. Morales-Fusco, Pau & Saurí, Sergi & Lago, Alejandro, 2012. "Potential freight distribution improvements using motorways of the sea," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 1-11.
    8. Yang, Jinglei & Luo, Meifeng & Ji, Abing, 2016. "Analyzing the spatial–temporal evolution of a gateway’s hinterland: A case study of Shanghai, China," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 355-367.
    9. Marino Lupi & Antonio Pratelli & Federico Campi & Andrea Ceccotti & Alessandro Farina, 2021. "The “Island Formation” within the Hinterland of a Port System: The Case of the Padan Plain in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-28, April.
    10. Koi Yu Adolf Ng & César Ducruet, 2014. "The changing tides of port geography (1950–2012)," Post-Print halshs-01359160, HAL.
    11. Reis, Vasco, 2014. "Analysis of mode choice variables in short-distance intermodal freight transport using an agent-based model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 100-120.
    12. Chia-Nan Wang & Thanh-Tuan Dang & Tran Quynh Le & Panitan Kewcharoenwong, 2020. "Transportation Optimization Models for Intermodal Networks with Fuzzy Node Capacity, Detour Factor, and Vehicle Utilization Constraints," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-27, November.
    13. Santos, Tiago A. & Guedes Soares, C., 2019. "Container terminal potential hinterland delimitation in a multi-port system subject to a regionalization process," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 132-146.
    14. Fazi, Stefano & Fransoo, Jan C. & Van Woensel, Tom & Dong, Jing-Xin, 2020. "A variant of the split vehicle routing problem with simultaneous deliveries and pickups for inland container shipping in dry-port based systems," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    15. Bury Alan & Paraskevadakis Dimitrios & Ren Jun & Saeed Farhan, 2017. "A framework for use in modelling the modal choice decision making process in North West England’s Atlantic Gateway," Logistics, Supply Chain, Sustainability and Global Challenges, Sciendo, vol. 8(1), pages 19-30, May.
    16. Fan Bu & Heather Nachtmann, 2023. "Literature review and comparative analysis of inland waterways transport: “Container on Barge”," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 25(1), pages 140-173, March.
    17. Qiu, Xuan & Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee & Huang, George Q., 2015. "A bilevel storage pricing model for outbound containers in a dry port system," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 65-83.
    18. Persyn, Damiaan & Díaz-Lanchas, Jorge & Barbero, Javier, 2022. "Estimating road transport costs between and within European Union regions," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 33-42.
    19. Izabela Kotowska & Marta Mańkowska & Michał Pluciński, 2018. "Inland Shipping to Serve the Hinterland: The Challenge for Seaport Authorities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, September.
    20. Guerrero, David, 2014. "Deep-sea hinterlands: Some empirical evidence of the spatial impact of containerization," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 84-94.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:8:p:2212-:d:222280. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.