IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i7p1981-d219557.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Competitive Position of Mobile Communication Companies: Comprehensive Perspectives of Insiders and Outsiders

Author

Listed:
  • Junwei Ma

    (Changshu Institute of Technology, School of Economic and Management, No. 99, 3rd South Ring Road, Changshu 215500, China)

  • Jianhua Wang

    (Changshu Institute of Technology, School of Economic and Management, No. 99, 3rd South Ring Road, Changshu 215500, China)

  • Philip Szmedra

    (School of Business Administration, Georgia Southwestern State University, Americus, GA 31709, USA)

Abstract

The identification of a sustainable competitive position in enterprises is a common concern of information science and sustainable development research. Achievement of sustainable competitive position and superior performance is the first priority of business organizations. However, the existing research focuses on technology competition and light market competition. The research proposes a comprehensive framework for identifying an enterprise’s sustainable competitive position based on a two-dimensional perspective of insiders (enterprise self-positioning) and outsiders (public cognition), including enterprise technology competition identification based on technology proximity, and enterprise market competition identification based on URL co-occurrence analysis. Based on the patents collected using the Derwent Innovation Index (DII) and the URL data collected from the Internet, the sustainable competitive position of mobile communication companies is identified from two dimensions of insiders and outsiders. QAP (quadratic assignment procedure) correlation analysis shows that these two dimensions are complementary. The two-dimensional perspective is integrated to comprehensively analyze the sustainable competitive position of Huawei, and thus obtain valuable information. In order to achieve the sustainability of competitive position in the industry, mobile communication enterprises must improve their management level (marketing characteristics of management and low cost structure), and must also have the ability to break through the governance system (rigid characteristics of governance) in a timely manner, and gain the ability to create value for customers in the long run (enhancement of public cognition and public image, and customer loyalty). Meanwhile, the mobile communication industry is a typical network externality market. If the companies want to obtain a sustainable competitive position in the competitive landscape, they need to manage user’s expectations, expand the foundation of users, achieve extensive cooperation and alliances with manufacturers of complementary products, and improve the quality and reputation of their brands.

Suggested Citation

  • Junwei Ma & Jianhua Wang & Philip Szmedra, 2019. "Sustainable Competitive Position of Mobile Communication Companies: Comprehensive Perspectives of Insiders and Outsiders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:7:p:1981-:d:219557
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/1981/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/1981/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Janghyeok Yoon & Hyunseok Park & Kwangsoo Kim, 2013. "Identifying technological competition trends for R&D planning using dynamic patent maps: SAO-based content analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 94(1), pages 313-331, January.
    2. M. Berk Talay & Janell D. Townsend, 2015. "Do or die: competitive effects and Red Queen dynamics in the product survival race," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 24(3), pages 721-738.
    3. Mike Thelwall & Pardeep Sud & David Wilkinson, 2012. "Link and co‐inlink network diagrams with URL citations or title mentions," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(4), pages 805-816, April.
    4. Lihong Qian & I. Kim Wang, 2017. "Competition and innovation: The tango of the market and technology in the competitive landscape," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(8), pages 1237-1247, December.
    5. Farzin, Y. H. & Huisman, K. J. M. & Kort, P. M., 1998. "Optimal timing of technology adoption," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 779-799, May.
    6. Jaffe, Adam B, 1986. "Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms' Patents, Profits, and Market Value," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 76(5), pages 984-1001, December.
    7. Mike Thelwall & Pardeep Sud, 2011. "A comparison of methods for collecting web citation data for academic organizations," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(8), pages 1488-1497, August.
    8. Seokbeom Kwon & Alan Porter & Jan Youtie, 2016. "Navigating the innovation trajectories of technology by combining specialization score analyses for publications and patents: graphene and nano-enabled drug delivery," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 106(3), pages 1057-1071, March.
    9. Michael J. Leiblein & Tammy L. Madsen, 2009. "Unbundling competitive heterogeneity: incentive structures and capability influences on technological innovation," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 711-735, July.
    10. Liwen Vaughan & Justin You, 2006. "Comparing business competition positions based on Web co-link data: The global market vs. the Chinese market," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 68(3), pages 611-628, September.
    11. Rahul Kapoor & Ron Adner, 2012. "What Firms Make vs. What They Know: How Firms' Production and Knowledge Boundaries Affect Competitive Advantage in the Face of Technological Change," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(5), pages 1227-1248, October.
    12. Scherer, F. M., 1982. "Inter-industry technology flows in the United States," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 227-245, August.
    13. Liwen Vaughan & Yijun Gao & Margaret Kipp, 2006. "Why are hyperlinks to business Websites created? A content analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 67(2), pages 291-300, May.
    14. Josh Lerner, 1997. "An Empirical Exploration of a Technology Race," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 28(2), pages 228-247, Summer.
    15. Paul M. Vaaler & Gerry McNamara, 2010. "Are Technology-Intensive Industries More Dynamically Competitive? No and Yes," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 271-289, February.
    16. Choi, Jinho & Hwang, Yong-Sik, 2014. "Patent keyword network analysis for improving technology development efficiency," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 170-182.
    17. Lee, Won Sang & Han, Eun Jin & Sohn, So Young, 2015. "Predicting the pattern of technology convergence using big-data technology on large-scale triadic patents," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 317-329.
    18. Momeni, Abdolreza & Rost, Katja, 2016. "Identification and monitoring of possible disruptive technologies by patent-development paths and topic modeling," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 16-29.
    19. Thelwall, Mike & Sud, Pardeep, 2012. "Webometric research with the Bing Search API 2.0," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 44-52.
    20. Scott F. Turner & Will Mitchell & Richard A. Bettis, 2010. "Responding to Rivals and Complements: How Market Concentration Shapes Generational Product Innovation Strategy," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 854-872, August.
    21. Javier Gimeno & Carolyn Y. Woo, 1996. "Hypercompetition in a Multimarket Environment: The Role of Strategic Similarity and Multimarket Contact in Competitive De-Escalation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(3), pages 322-341, June.
    22. William P. Barnett & Olav Sorenson, 2002. "The Red Queen in organizational creation and development," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 11(2), pages 289-325.
    23. Margaret A. Peteraf & Mark E. Bergen, 2003. "Scanning dynamic competitive landscapes: a market‐based and resource‐based framework," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(10), pages 1027-1041, October.
    24. Caviggioli, Federico, 2016. "Technology fusion: Identification and analysis of the drivers of technology convergence using patent data," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 55, pages 22-32.
    25. Mike Thelwall & Pardeep Sud, 2011. "A comparison of methods for collecting web citation data for academic organizations," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(8), pages 1488-1497, August.
    26. Melissa M. Appleyard & Clara Y. Wang & J. Alexander Liddle & John Carruthers, 2008. "The innovator's non-dilemma: the case of next-generation lithography," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(5), pages 407-423.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Affan Ahmed Khan & Ming Zheng Wang & Sadaf Ehsan & Mohammad Nurunnabi & Maaida Hussain Hashmi, 2019. "Linking Sustainability-Oriented Marketing to Social Media and Web Atmospheric Cues," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-28, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kim Wang, 2017. "Technology Deployment By Late Movers," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(04), pages 1-25, May.
    2. Pardeep Sud & Mike Thelwall, 2014. "Linked title mentions: a new automated link search candidate," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(3), pages 1831-1849, December.
    3. Srijana Acharya & Han Woo Park, 2017. "Open data in Nepal: a webometric network analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 1027-1043, May.
    4. Chen, Yinghui, 2021. "Does political turnover stifle or stimulate corporate innovation?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1126-1145.
    5. Jungpyo Lee & So Young Sohn, 2021. "Recommendation system for technology convergence opportunities based on self-supervised representation learning," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(1), pages 1-25, January.
    6. Enrique Orduña-Malea, 2021. "Dot-science top level domain: Academic websites or dumpsites?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(4), pages 3565-3591, April.
    7. Judit Bar-Ilan & Rina Azoulay, 2012. "Map of nonprofit organization websites in Israel," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(6), pages 1142-1167, June.
    8. Wang, I. Kim & Seidle, Russell, 2017. "The degree of technological innovation: A demand heterogeneity perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 166-177.
    9. Juite Wang & Tzu-Yen Hsu, 2023. "Early discovery of emerging multi-technology convergence for analyzing technology opportunities from patent data: the case of smart health," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(8), pages 4167-4196, August.
    10. Wang, I. Kim & Qian, Lihong & Lehrer, Mark, 2017. "From technology race to technology marathon: A behavioral explanation of technology advancement," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 187-197.
    11. Amalia Mas-Bleda & Mike Thelwall & Kayvan Kousha & Isidro F. Aguillo, 2014. "Do highly cited researchers successfully use the social web?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(1), pages 337-356, October.
    12. David Gunnarsson Lorentzen, 2014. "Webometrics benefitting from web mining? An investigation of methods and applications of two research fields," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 99(2), pages 409-445, May.
    13. Serkan Altuntas & Zulfiye Erdogan & Turkay Dereli, 2020. "A clustering-based approach for the evaluation of candidate emerging technologies," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(2), pages 1157-1177, August.
    14. Joshua S. Gans & David H. Hsu & Scott Stern, 2002. "When Does Start-Up Innovation Spur the Gale of Creative Destruction?," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 33(4), pages 571-586, Winter.
    15. Sick, Nathalie & Preschitschek, Nina & Leker, Jens & Bröring, Stefanie, 2019. "A new framework to assess industry convergence in high technology environments," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 84, pages 48-58.
    16. Sungho Son & Nam-Wook Cho, 2020. "Technology Fusion Characteristics in the Solar Photovoltaic Industry of South Korea: A Patent Network Analysis Using IPC Co-Occurrence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-19, October.
    17. Steffen Runge & Christian Schwens & Matthias Schulz, 2022. "The invention performance implications of coopetition: How technological, geographical, and product market overlaps shape learning and competitive tension in R&D alliances," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(2), pages 266-294, February.
    18. Sharon Belenzon & Tomer Berkovitz, 2010. "Innovation in Business Groups," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(3), pages 519-535, March.
    19. Carlos Olmeda-Gómez & Maria-Antonia Ovalle-Perandones & Antonio Perianes-Rodríguez, 2017. "Co-word analysis and thematic landscapes in Spanish information science literature, 1985–2014," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(1), pages 195-217, October.
    20. Cristiano Antonelli & Francesco Crespi & Christian A. Mongeau Ospina & Giuseppe Scellato, 2017. "Knowledge composition, Jacobs externalities and innovation performance in European regions," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(11), pages 1708-1720, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:7:p:1981-:d:219557. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.