IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i4p1167-d208290.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mobile Augmented Reality for Cultural Heritage: Following the Footsteps of Ovid among Different Locations in Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Răzvan Gabriel Boboc

    (Department of Automotive and Transport Engineering, Transilvania University of Brasov, RO-500036 Brasov, Romania)

  • Mihai Duguleană

    (Department of Automotive and Transport Engineering, Transilvania University of Brasov, RO-500036 Brasov, Romania)

  • Gheorghe-Daniel Voinea

    (Department of Automotive and Transport Engineering, Transilvania University of Brasov, RO-500036 Brasov, Romania)

  • Cristian-Cezar Postelnicu

    (Department of Automotive and Transport Engineering, Transilvania University of Brasov, RO-500036 Brasov, Romania)

  • Dorin-Mircea Popovici

    (Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Ovidius University of Constanta, 8700 Constanta, Romania)

  • Marcello Carrozzino

    (Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, 56127 Pisa, Italy)

Abstract

There are many examples of cultural events that distinguish people nationally. Celebrating this can bring people closer, as inhabitants of different countries share similar cultural values. This study investigates a sustainable way to enhance these types of events. On the occasion of the 2000-year anniversary of the death of the Roman poet Ovid, we propose a mobile augmented reality (MAR) application that contains historical information related to his life. As Ovid often stated in his last poems, he feared his work would be forgotten after his exile from Rome. This paper focuses on assessing whether this is the case, while also disseminating factual, historic data to people who tested the application. Experiments were conducted in Italy and Romania, in three different cities: Sulmona, Rome, and Constanta. Based on the results collected, four constructs were investigated: comprehensibility, manipulability, enjoyment, and usefulness. The results revealed that the usability of the MAR application, and the interaction metaphor, are appropriate for the general public. The MAR application provided a positive experience, and thus, increased the extent of the occasion.

Suggested Citation

  • Răzvan Gabriel Boboc & Mihai Duguleană & Gheorghe-Daniel Voinea & Cristian-Cezar Postelnicu & Dorin-Mircea Popovici & Marcello Carrozzino, 2019. "Mobile Augmented Reality for Cultural Heritage: Following the Footsteps of Ovid among Different Locations in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:4:p:1167-:d:208290
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/4/1167/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/4/1167/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eleanor E. Cranmer & M. Claudia Dieck & Timothy Jung, 2018. "How can Tourist Attractions Profit from Augmented Reality?," Progress in IS, in: Timothy Jung & M. Claudia tom Dieck (ed.), Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality, pages 21-32, Springer.
    2. Antonio Martínez-Graña & José Ángel González-Delgado & Celia Ramos & Juan Carlos Gonzalo, 2018. "Augmented Reality and Valorizing the Mesozoic Geological Heritage (Burgos, Spain)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Rese, Alexandra & Baier, Daniel & Geyer-Schulz, Andreas & Schreiber, Stefanie, 2017. "How augmented reality apps are accepted by consumers: A comparative analysis using scales and opinions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 306-319.
    4. Slimane Larabi, 2018. "Augmented Reality for Mobile Devices: Textual Annotation of Outdoor Locations," Progress in IS, in: Timothy Jung & M. Claudia tom Dieck (ed.), Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality, pages 353-362, Springer.
    5. Ana Javornik, 2018. "Directions for Studying User Experience with Augmented Reality in Public," Progress in IS, in: Timothy Jung & M. Claudia tom Dieck (ed.), Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality, pages 199-210, Springer.
    6. Dai-In Han & Timothy Jung, 2018. "Identifying Tourist Requirements for Mobile AR Tourism Applications in Urban Heritage Tourism," Progress in IS, in: Timothy Jung & M. Claudia tom Dieck (ed.), Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality, pages 3-20, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chunyu Jiang & Seuk Wai Phoong, 2023. "A ten-year review analysis of the impact of digitization on tourism development (2012–2022)," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Francesco Di Stefano & Alessandro Torresani & Elisa M. Farella & Roberto Pierdicca & Fabio Menna & Fabio Remondino, 2021. "3D Surveying of Underground Built Heritage: Opportunities and Challenges of Mobile Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Bing Mei & Shuxia Yang, 2019. "Nurturing Environmental Education at the Tertiary Education Level in China: Can Mobile Augmented Reality and Gamification Help?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-12, August.
    4. Alina Simona Tecau & Bianca Tescasiu & Cristinel Petrisor Constantin, 2019. "Integrating Augmented Reality in the Social Media Platforms. The Users’ Perspective," Risk in Contemporary Economy, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, pages 442-448.
    5. Agnese Augello & Ignazio Infantino & Giovanni Pilato & Gianpaolo Vitale, 2021. "Site Experience Enhancement and Perspective in Cultural Heritage Fruition—A Survey on New Technologies and Methodologies Based on a “Four-Pillars” Approach," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-23, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Diego A. Barrado-Timón & Carmen Hidalgo-Giralt, 2019. "The Historic City, Its Transmission and Perception via Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality and the Use of the Past as a Resource for the Present: A New Era for Urban Cultural Heritage and Tourism?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-26, May.
    2. Carsten D. Schultz & Björn Gorlas, 2023. "Magic mirror on the wall: Cross-buying at the point of sale," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 1677-1700, September.
    3. Joerß, Tom & Hoffmann, Stefan & Mai, Robert & Akbar, Payam, 2021. "Digitalization as solution to environmental problems? When users rely on augmented reality-recommendation agents," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 510-523.
    4. Hsu, Sheila Hsuan-Yu & Tsou, Hung-Tai & Chen, Ja-Shen, 2021. "“Yes, we do. Why not use augmented reality?†customer responses to experiential presentations of AR-based applications," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    5. Stefan Hoffmann & Tom Joerß & Robert Mai & Payam Akbar, 2022. "Augmented reality-delivered product information at the point of sale: when information controllability backfires," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 743-776, July.
    6. Heller, Jonas & Chylinski, Mathew & de Ruyter, Ko & Mahr, Dominik & Keeling, Debbie I., 2019. "Let Me Imagine That for You: Transforming the Retail Frontline Through Augmenting Customer Mental Imagery Ability," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 95(2), pages 94-114.
    7. Xinlu Wen & Marios Sotiriadis & Shiwei Shen, 2023. "Determining the Key Drivers for the Acceptance and Usage of AR and VR in Cultural Heritage Monuments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-24, February.
    8. Holdack, Eric & Lurie-Stoyanov, Katja & Fromme, Harro Fabian, 2022. "The role of perceived enjoyment and perceived informativeness in assessing the acceptance of AR wearables," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    9. McLean, Graeme & Osei-Frimpong, Kofi & Al-Nabhani, Khalid & Marriott, Hannah, 2020. "Examining consumer attitudes towards retailers' m-commerce mobile applications – An initial adoption vs. continuous use perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 139-157.
    10. Fan, Xiaojun & Chai, Zeli & Deng, Nianqi & Dong, Xuebing, 2020. "Adoption of augmented reality in online retailing and consumers’ product attitude: A cognitive perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    11. Singh, Pratibha & Sharma, Mahak & Daim, Tugrul, 2024. "Envisaging AR travel revolution for visiting heritage sites: A mixed-method approach," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    12. Rui Zhang & Chang Zhang, 2022. "Classification and Application of Digital Technologies in Landscape Heritage Protection," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, September.
    13. Esperanza Fernández-Martínez & Ismael Coronado & Luna Adrados & Rodrigo Castaño, 2022. "Factors in the Responsible Management of the Luna Valley Complex Geosite (NW Spain)—A Case Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-31, November.
    14. Vieira, Valter Afonso & Rafael, Diego Nogueira & Agnihotri, Raj, 2022. "Augmented reality generalizations: A meta-analytical review on consumer-related outcomes and the mediating role of hedonic and utilitarian values," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 170-184.
    15. Jiang, Yi & Wang, Xueqin & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2021. "Augmented reality shopping application usage: The influence of attitude, value, and characteristics of innovation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    16. Stance Hurst & Doug Cunningham & Eileen Johnson, 2023. "Collecting Rocks on the Frontier: Investigating the Geodiversity Significance of Historical Building Stones and Rock Collecting at the Maxey Homestead, Northwest Texas, USA," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, March.
    17. Pillai, Rajasshrie & Sivathanu, Brijesh & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2020. "Shopping intention at AI-powered automated retail stores (AIPARS)," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    18. Yavuz, Merve & Çorbacıoğlu, Eda & Başoğlu, Ahmet Nuri & Daim, Tugrul Unsal & Shaygan, Amir, 2021. "Augmented reality technology adoption: Case of a mobile application in Turkey," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    19. Xingyuan Wang & Yun Liu & Hongchen Liu, 2020. "Examining Users’ Adoption of Precision Medicine: The Moderating Role of Medical Technical Knowledge," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-16, February.
    20. Hoffmann, Stefan & Lasarov, Wassili & Reimers, Hanna, 2022. "Carbon footprint tracking apps. What drives consumers' adoption intention?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:4:p:1167-:d:208290. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.