IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i23p6781-d292274.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Renewable Energy Prosumers in Mediterranean Viticulture Social–Ecological Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Ines Campos

    (Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes (CE3C), Faculty of Sciences, Lisbon University, 1649-004 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Esther Marín-González

    (Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes (CE3C), Faculty of Sciences, Lisbon University, 1649-004 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Guilherme Luz

    (Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes (CE3C), Faculty of Sciences, Lisbon University, 1649-004 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • João Barroso

    (Sustainability Plan for Wines of Alentejo, Comissão Vitivinícola Regional Alentejana, 7005-485 Évora, Portugal)

  • Nuno Oliveira

    (Ecosystem management, Esporão SA, 1400-315 Lisboa, Portugal)

Abstract

The significant energy demands of wine production pose both a challenge and an opportunity for adopting a low-carbon, more sustainable and potentially less expensive energy model. Nevertheless, the (dis)incentives for the wider adoption of local production and self-consumption of energy (also known as “prosumerism”) from renewable energy sources (RESs) are still not sufficiently addressed, nor are the broader social–ecological benefits of introducing RES as part of a sustainable viticulture strategy. Drawing on the social–ecological systems (SESs) resilience framework, this article presents the results of a Living Lab (an action-research approach) implemented in Alentejo (South of Portugal), which is an important wine-producing Mediterranean region. The triangulation of results from the application of a multi-method approach, including quantitative and qualitative methods, provided an understanding of the constraining and enabling factors for individual and collective RES prosumer initiatives. Top enablers are related to society’s expectation for a greener wine production, but also the responsibility to contribute to reducing carbon emissions and energy costs; meanwhile, the top constraints are financial, legal and technological. The conclusions offer some policy implications and avenues for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Ines Campos & Esther Marín-González & Guilherme Luz & João Barroso & Nuno Oliveira, 2019. "Renewable Energy Prosumers in Mediterranean Viticulture Social–Ecological Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-16, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:23:p:6781-:d:292274
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/23/6781/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/23/6781/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeremy Galbreath & David Charles & Eddie Oczkowski, 2016. "The Drivers of Climate Change Innovations: Evidence from the Australian Wine Industry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(2), pages 217-231, May.
    2. Smyth, M. & Russell, J., 2009. "'From graft to bottle'--Analysis of energy use in viticulture and wine production and the potential for solar renewable technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(8), pages 1985-1993, October.
    3. Nieves Garcia-Casarejos & Pilar Gargallo & Javier Carroquino, 2018. "Introduction of Renewable Energy in the Spanish Wine Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-17, September.
    4. Hall, Stephen & Roelich, Katy, 2016. "Business model innovation in electricity supply markets: The role of complex value in the United Kingdom," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 286-298.
    5. Mark Cordano & R. Marshall & Murray Silverman, 2010. "How do Small and Medium Enterprises Go “Green”? A Study of Environmental Management Programs in the U.S. Wine Industry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 92(3), pages 463-478, March.
    6. Herbes, Carsten & Brummer, Vasco & Rognli, Judith & Blazejewski, Susanne & Gericke, Naomi, 2017. "Responding to policy change: New business models for renewable energy cooperatives – Barriers perceived by cooperatives’ members," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 82-95.
    7. Ilaria Zambon & Andrea Colantoni & Massimo Cecchini & Enrico Maria Mosconi, 2018. "Rethinking Sustainability within the Viticulture Realities Integrating Economy, Landscape and Energy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-13, January.
    8. Marshall, R. Scott & Akoorie, Michèle E.M. & Hamann, Ralph & Sinha, Paresha, 2010. "Environmental practices in the wine industry: An empirical application of the theory of reasoned action and stakeholder theory in the United States and New Zealand," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 405-414, October.
    9. Inmaculada Carrasco & Juan-Sebastián Castillo-Valero & Ana Pérez-Luño, 2019. "Wine Tourism and Wine Vacation as a Cultural and Creative Industry: The Case of the Bullas Wine Route," Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management, in: Marta Peris-Ortiz & Mayer Rainiero Cabrera-Flores & Arturo Serrano-Santoyo (ed.), Cultural and Creative Industries, chapter 0, pages 181-195, Springer.
    10. Sidsel Grimstad & John Burgess, 2014. "Environmental sustainability and competitive advantage in a wine tourism micro-cluster," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 37(6), pages 553-573, May.
    11. Costa, J.M. & Vaz, M. & Escalona, J. & Egipto, R. & Lopes, C. & Medrano, H. & Chaves, M.M., 2016. "Modern viticulture in southern Europe: Vulnerabilities and strategies for adaptation to water scarcity," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 164(P1), pages 5-18.
    12. Daniel Gómez-Lorente & Ovidio Rabaza & Fernando Aznar-Dols & María José Mercado-Vargas, 2017. "Economic and Environmental Study of Wineries Powered by Grid-Connected Photovoltaic Systems in Spain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-14, February.
    13. Thomas Morstyn & Niall Farrell & Sarah J. Darby & Malcolm D. McCulloch, 2018. "Using peer-to-peer energy-trading platforms to incentivize prosumers to form federated power plants," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 3(2), pages 94-101, February.
    14. Koirala, Binod Prasad & Koliou, Elta & Friege, Jonas & Hakvoort, Rudi A. & Herder, Paulien M., 2016. "Energetic communities for community energy: A review of key issues and trends shaping integrated community energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 722-744.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guilherme Pontes Luz & Rodrigo Amaro e Silva, 2021. "Modeling Energy Communities with Collective Photovoltaic Self-Consumption: Synergies between a Small City and a Winery in Portugal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-26, January.
    2. Paolo Picchi & Dirk Oudes & Sven Stremke, 2023. "Regional Strategy, Municipality Plans and Site Designs for Energy Transition in Amsterdam, The Netherlands: How Sustainable Are Implementation Processes on Different Spatial Levels?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Carla L. Simões & Ricardo Simoes & Ana Sofia Gonçalves & Leonel J. R. Nunes, 2023. "Environmental Analysis of the Valorization of Woody Biomass Residues: A Comparative Study with Vine Pruning Leftovers in Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-16, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nieves Garcia-Casarejos & Pilar Gargallo & Javier Carroquino, 2018. "Introduction of Renewable Energy in the Spanish Wine Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Moritz Ehrtmann & Lars Holstenkamp & Timon Becker, 2021. "Regional Electricity Models for Community Energy in Germany: The Role of Governance Structures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, February.
    3. Wittmayer, Julia M. & Avelino, Flor & Pel, Bonno & Campos, Inês, 2021. "Contributing to sustainable and just energy systems? The mainstreaming of renewable energy prosumerism within and across institutional logics," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    4. Jia, Teng & Dai, Yanjun & Wang, Ruzhu, 2018. "Refining energy sources in winemaking industry by using solar energy as alternatives for fossil fuels: A review and perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 278-296.
    5. Avilés A., Camilo & Oliva H., Sebastian & Watts, David, 2019. "Single-dwelling and community renewable microgrids: Optimal sizing and energy management for new business models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    6. Luigino Barisan & Marco Lucchetta & Cristian Bolzonella & Vasco Boatto, 2019. "How Does Carbon Footprint Create Shared Values in the Wine Industry? Empirical Evidence from Prosecco Superiore PDO’s Wine District," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-13, May.
    7. Chun Xia-Bauer & Florin Vondung & Stefan Thomas & Raphael Moser, 2022. "Business Model Innovations for Renewable Energy Prosumer Development in Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-17, June.
    8. Maarten Wolsink, 2020. "Framing in Renewable Energy Policies: A Glossary," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-31, June.
    9. Inês, Campos & Guilherme, Pontes Luz & Esther, Marín-González & Swantje, Gährs & Stephen, Hall & Lars, Holstenkamp, 2020. "Regulatory challenges and opportunities for collective renewable energy prosumers in the EU," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    10. Eugenio Pomarici & Riccardo Vecchio & Angela Mariani, 2015. "Wineries’ Perception of Sustainability Costs and Benefits: An Exploratory Study in California," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-11, December.
    11. Li, Na & Hakvoort, Rudi A. & Lukszo, Zofia, 2021. "Cost allocation in integrated community energy systems - A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    12. Georgarakis, Elena & Bauwens, Thomas & Pronk, Anne-Marie & AlSkaif, Tarek, 2021. "Keep it green, simple and socially fair: A choice experiment on prosumers’ preferences for peer-to-peer electricity trading in the Netherlands," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    13. Mengelkamp, Esther & Schlund, David & Weinhardt, Christof, 2019. "Development and real-world application of a taxonomy for business models in local energy markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    14. Hugo Lucas & Ruth Carbajo & Tomoo Machiba & Evgeny Zhukov & Luisa F. Cabeza, 2021. "Improving Public Attitude towards Renewable Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-16, July.
    15. Faia, Ricardo & Lezama, Fernando & Soares, João & Pinto, Tiago & Vale, Zita, 2024. "Local electricity markets: A review on benefits, barriers, current trends and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 190(PA).
    16. Stefano Moroni & Valentina Antoniucci & Adriano Bisello, 2019. "Local Energy Communities and Distributed Generation: Contrasting Perspectives, and Inevitable Policy Trade-Offs, beyond the Apparent Global Consensus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-16, June.
    17. Sophie Adams & Donal Brown & Juan Pablo Cárdenas Álvarez & Ruzanna Chitchyan & Michael J. Fell & Ulf J. J. Hahnel & Kristina Hojckova & Charlotte Johnson & Lurian Klein & Mehdi Montakhabi & Kelvin Say, 2021. "Social and Economic Value in Emerging Decentralized Energy Business Models: A Critical Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-29, November.
    18. Hackbarth, André & Löbbe, Sabine, 2020. "Attitudes, preferences, and intentions of German households concerning participation in peer-to-peer electricity trading," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    19. Conradie, Peter D. & De Ruyck, Olivia & Saldien, Jelle & Ponnet, Koen, 2021. "Who wants to join a renewable energy community in Flanders? Applying an extended model of Theory of Planned Behaviour to understand intent to participate," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    20. Eunice Espe & Vidyasagar Potdar & Elizabeth Chang, 2018. "Prosumer Communities and Relationships in Smart Grids: A Literature Review, Evolution and Future Directions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-24, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:23:p:6781-:d:292274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.