IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i18p4905-d265305.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Analysis of Mission Statements of Chinese and American Fortune 500 Companies: A Study from the Perspective of Linguistics

Author

Listed:
  • Quan Lin

    (Business School, Shantou University, Guangdong 515063, China)

  • Yingchang Huang

    (Business School, Shantou University, Guangdong 515063, China)

  • Ruojin Zhu

    (Business School, Shantou University, Guangdong 515063, China)

  • Yue Zhang

    (Department of Accounting and Information Systems, California State University, Northridge 18111 Nordhoff St, Northridge, CA 91330-8372, USA)

Abstract

A mission statement is an important instrument for strategic management for an enterprise. How to establish a mission statement and how to leverage its roles in conveying the vision of and leading the long-term and sustainable growth of the enterprise are critical in strategic planning for enterprises. The current study adopted a corpus analysis method and built a corpus of mission statements by selecting the mission statements of 100 companies each from Chinese and American companies in the 2017 Fortune 500 companies. Through the analysis of high-frequency words obtained from the corpus based on the appraisal system approach from Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL), we attempted to identify the characteristics discerning the mission statements of Chinese and American companies. Our results showed that (1) the distribution patterns of evaluation resource words of Chinese and American companies are similar; (2) Chinese companies highlight innovation, society and development of the enterprise, while American companies emphasize customers and product or service; (3) both Chinese and American enterprises highly concern survival, philosophy and public image; (4) American companies pay more attention to stakeholders, especially primary social stakeholders, while Chinese companies’ attention is inclined to secondary social stakeholders. It is concluded that the mission statements of Chinese companies are society oriented and emphasize the social roles of an organization, showing a corporate pertinence to a lesser extent, while American companies’ mission statements pay more attention to customers and partner relationships, which can be seen as the American companies’ market and individual orientation.

Suggested Citation

  • Quan Lin & Yingchang Huang & Ruojin Zhu & Yue Zhang, 2019. "Comparative Analysis of Mission Statements of Chinese and American Fortune 500 Companies: A Study from the Perspective of Linguistics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-18, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:18:p:4905-:d:265305
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/18/4905/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/18/4905/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lina Zhou & Dongsong Zhang, 2003. "NLPIR: A theoretical framework for applying natural language processing to information retrieval," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 54(2), pages 115-123, January.
    2. Barbara Bartkus & Myron Glassman, 2008. "Do Firms Practice What They Preach? The Relationship Between Mission Statements and Stakeholder Management," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 83(2), pages 207-216, December.
    3. Mojca Duh & Jernej Belak & Borut Milfelner, 2010. "Core Values, Culture and Ethical Climate as Constitutional Elements of Ethical Behaviour: Exploring Differences Between Family and Non-Family Enterprises," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 97(3), pages 473-489, December.
    4. Tolbert, Pamela S. & Zucker, Lynne G., 1994. "Institutional Analyses of Organizations: Legitimate but not Institutionalized," Institute for Social Science Research, Working Paper Series qt23z6m92c, Institute for Social Science Research, UCLA.
    5. Bartkus, Barbara & Glassman, Myron & McAfee, Bruce, 2006. "Mission Statement Quality and Financial Performance," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 86-94, February.
    6. Sebastian Desmidt, 2016. "The Relevance of Mission Statements: Analysing the antecedents of perceived message quality and its relationship to employee mission engagement," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(6), pages 894-917, July.
    7. Macedo, Isabel Maria & Pinho, José Carlos & Silva, Anabela Martins, 2016. "Revisiting the link between mission statements and organizational performance in the non-profit sector: The mediating effect of organizational commitment," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 36-46.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Quan Lin & Yutao Zhu & Yue Zhang, 2020. "How Does Mission Statement Relate to the Pursuit of Food Safety Certification by Food Companies?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-15, July.
    2. Quan Lin & Nana Zhang & Wanchao Guan, 2021. "What Drives the Food Safety Certification: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Food Companies in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-16, June.
    3. Jongdo Jeon & Keun Tae Cho, 2021. "Differences in Readability, Keywords, and Orientation of Mission Statements of the Top 100 Korean and Top 100 US Traditional and Innovative Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-24, September.
    4. Dmitry A. Ruban & Natalia N. Yashalova, 2022. "Corporate Web Positioning as a Strategic Communication Tool in Agriculture," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-16, July.
    5. Mehmet Yildiz & Nicola Pless & Semih Ceyhan & Rob Hallak, 2023. "Responsible Leadership and Innovation during COVID-19: Evidence from the Australian Tourism and Hospitality Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-21, March.
    6. Arafat Aljebrini & Kagan Dogruyol & Ibraheem Y. Y. Ahmaro, 2025. "How Strategic Planning Enhances ESG: Evidence from Mission Statements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-19, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jasmina Berbegal-Mirabent & Marta Mas-Machuca & Patricia Guix, 2021. "Impact of mission statement components on social enterprises’ performance," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 705-724, April.
    2. Law, Kris M.Y. & Breznik, Kristijan, 2018. "What do airline mission statements reveal about value and strategy?," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 36-44.
    3. Giorgio Mion & Cristian Rolando Loza Adaui & Angelo Bonfanti, 2021. "Characterizing the mission statements of benefit corporations: Empirical evidence from Italy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 2160-2172, May.
    4. Lin, YiHsin & Ryan, Chris, 2016. "From mission statement to airline branding," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 150-160.
    5. Lara Penco & Giorgia Profumo & Roberta Scarsi, 2017. "Stakeholder Orientation in Cruise Lines’ Mission Statements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-24, November.
    6. Quan Lin & Yutao Zhu & Yue Zhang, 2020. "How Does Mission Statement Relate to the Pursuit of Food Safety Certification by Food Companies?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-15, July.
    7. Ethem Duygulu & Emir Ozeren & Pınar Işıldar & Andrea Appolloni, 2016. "The Sustainable Strategy for Small and Medium Sized Enterprises: The Relationship between Mission Statements and Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-16, July.
    8. Marta Mas-Machuca & Maria Ballesteros-Sola & Adrián Guerrero, 2017. "Unveiling the mission statements in social enterprises: a comparative content analysis of US- vs. Spanish-based organizations," Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 186-200, May.
    9. Macedo, Isabel Maria & Pinho, José Carlos & Silva, Anabela Martins, 2016. "Revisiting the link between mission statements and organizational performance in the non-profit sector: The mediating effect of organizational commitment," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 36-46.
    10. Gopal Krishnan & Marietta Peytcheva, 2019. "The Risk of Fraud in Family Firms: Assessments of External Auditors," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(1), pages 261-278, June.
    11. P.W.J. de Bijl & Helanya Fourie, 2019. "The energy transition: Does ownership matter for realizing public interest objectives?," Working Papers 19-24, Utrecht School of Economics.
    12. Sheikh Shamim Hasnain, 2020. "A Critical Comparison between Manufacturing and Service Firms’ Mission Statements: Manage Your Firms’ Mission Statements with Care Using Readability and Lexical Techniques," Business Management and Strategy, Macrothink Institute, vol. 11(1), pages 216-231, June.
    13. Julian D. Cortes & Liliana Rivera & Katerina Bohle Carbonell, 2021. "Mission Statements in Universities: Readability and performance," Papers 2104.07438, arXiv.org.
    14. Melanie Richards, 2023. "When do Non-financial Goals Benefit Stakeholders? Theorizing on Care and Power in Family Firms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(2), pages 333-351, May.
    15. Pei-Hsuan Tsai & Chin-Tsai Lin, 2018. "How Should National Museums Create Competitive Advantage Following Changes in the Global Economic Environment?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, October.
    16. Lu-Ming Tseng, 2019. "How Implicit Ethics Institutionalization Affects Ethical Selling Intention: The Case of Taiwan’s Life Insurance Salespeople," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(3), pages 727-742, September.
    17. Eleanor O’Higgins, 2010. "Corporations, Civil Society, and Stakeholders: An Organizational Conceptualization," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 94(2), pages 157-176, June.
    18. Arz, Christopher, 2019. "Bridging the micro-macro gap: A multi-layer culture framework for understanding entrepreneurial orientation in family firms," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 1-1.
    19. Bayrak, Tuncay, 2020. "A content analysis of top-ranked universities’ mission statements from five global regions," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    20. María del Mar Miras‐Rodríguez & Amalia Carrasco‐Gallego & Bernabé Escobar‐Pérez, 2015. "Are Socially Responsible Behaviors Paid Off Equally? A Cross‐cultural Analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(4), pages 237-256, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:18:p:4905-:d:265305. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.