IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i18p4867-d264665.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Open Educational Resources and Practices in China: A Systematic Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmed Tlili

    (Smart Learning Institute of Beijing Normal University, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Ronghuai Huang

    (Smart Learning Institute of Beijing Normal University, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Ting-Wen Chang

    (Smart Learning Institute of Beijing Normal University, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Fabio Nascimbeni

    (UNIR iTED, Universidad Internacional de La Rioja (UNIR), 26006 Logroño, Spain)

  • Daniel Burgos

    (UNIR iTED, Universidad Internacional de La Rioja (UNIR), 26006 Logroño, Spain)

Abstract

The concepts of Open Educational Resources (OER) and Open Educational Practices (OEP), regarded as two pillars of the broader open education movement, have been evolving since the concept of OER was first coined in the 2012 Paris Declaration. Several research studies have been conducted to investigate the impacts of OER and OEP adoption and implementation in universities. However, most of those studies have focused on western and developed countries, and little information is known about developing countries, especially Asian ones. Particularly, China was one of the first Asian countries to adopt open education and its related strategies following the MIT OpenCourseWare conference in Beijing in 2003. This study conducts a systematic literature review to investigate the current state of the art of OER and OEP in China. The findings show that several governmental, organizational, and institutional initiatives have been launched to facilitate OER adoption in China. They also show that while several OEPs have been implemented, there is still a continuous need to work on these practices and further investigate their impacts on learning outcomes and behaviors, as no current reviewed study has done so. Finally, a generic framework of OER and OEP challenges is presented along with recommendations to further enhance the adoption of OER and OEP in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmed Tlili & Ronghuai Huang & Ting-Wen Chang & Fabio Nascimbeni & Daniel Burgos, 2019. "Open Educational Resources and Practices in China: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-14, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:18:p:4867-:d:264665
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/18/4867/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/18/4867/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andreia Inamorato dos Santos & Yves Punie & Jonatan Castaño Muñoz, 2016. "Opening up Education: A Support Framework for Higher Education Institutions," JRC Research Reports JRC101436, Joint Research Centre.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nduduzo C. Ndebele & Mfundo Mandla Masuku & Victor H. Mlambo, 2023. "Funding Open Educational Resources in Higher Education: A South African Public Policy Perspective," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, January.
    2. Filippos Evangelou, 2023. "The Use of Open Educational Resources as Teaching Tools in Primary Education: Activities by Postgraduate Students of the Hellenic Open University," International Journal of Learning and Development, Macrothink Institute, vol. 13(3), pages 1-18, September.
    3. Yali Zhang & Huihui Zhu & Bo Mu & Xiaojian Zhang & Xuerong Cui, 2020. "Inter-Campus Sharable Potential of Hardware Educational Resources in A University Town: Connotation, Determination Method and A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-18, February.
    4. Xiangling Zhang & Ahmed Tlili & Ronghuai Huang & Tingwen Chang & Daniel Burgos & Junfeng Yang & Jiacai Zhang, 2020. "A Case Study of Applying Open Educational Practices in Higher Education during COVID-19: Impacts on Learning Motivation and Perceptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-12, November.
    5. Pablo Alejandro Quezada-Sarmiento & Jon A. Elorriaga & Ana Arruarte & Hironori Washizaki, 2020. "Open BOK on Software Engineering Educational Context: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-20, August.
    6. Baoqing Song & Bingyang He & Zehua Wang & Ruichong Lin & Jinrui Yang & Runxian Zhou & Yunji Cai, 2022. "Research on Open Practice Teaching of Off-Campus Art Appreciation Based on ICT," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-14, April.
    7. Maria Soledad Ramirez-Montoya, 2020. "Challenges for Open Education with Educational Innovation: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-16, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paola Ingavélez-Guerra & Vladimir Robles-Bykbaev & António Teixeira & Salvador Otón-Tortosa & José Ramón Hilera, 2022. "Accessibility Challenges in OER and MOOC: MLR Analysis Considering the Pandemic Years," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Christian M. Stracke & Daniel Burgos & Gema Santos-Hermosa & Aras Bozkurt & Ramesh Chander Sharma & Cécile Swiatek Cassafieres & Andreia Inamorato dos Santos & Jon Mason & Ebba Ossiannilsson & Jin Gon, 2022. "Responding to the Initial Challenge of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Analysis of International Responses and Impact in School and Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-23, February.
    3. Qing Wang & Muhammad Saqib Khan & Muhammad Kamran Khan, 2021. "Predicting user perceived satisfaction and reuse intentions toward Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) in the Covid-19 pandemic," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(2), pages 1-11, March.
    4. Petra Biberhofer, 2019. "The economization of education and the implications of the quasi-commodification of knowledge on higher education for sustainable development," SRE-Disc sre-disc-2019_01, Institute for Multilevel Governance and Development, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    5. Katri Varis & Ilpo Jäppinen & Sirpa Kärkkäinen & Tuula Keinonen & Esko Väyrynen, 2018. "Promoting Participation in Society through Science Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-16, September.
    6. Maria Soledad Ramirez-Montoya, 2020. "Challenges for Open Education with Educational Innovation: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-16, August.
    7. Andreia Inamorato dos Santos, 2017. "Going Open: Policy Recommendations on Open Education in Europe (OpenEdu Policies)," JRC Research Reports JRC107708, Joint Research Centre.
    8. Jacqmin, Julien, 2022. "Why are some Massive Open Online Courses more open than others?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    9. Milijana Mićunović & Sabina Rako & Kristina Feldvari, 2023. "Open Educational Resources (OERs) at European Higher Education Institutions in the Field of Library and Information Science during COVID-19 Pandemic," Publications, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-26, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:18:p:4867-:d:264665. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.