IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i17p4808-d263626.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Overcoming Barriers for Adopting Cleaner Production: A Case Study in Brazilian Small Metal-Mechanic Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Roberto Leite

    (Industrial Engineering Post-Graduation Program, Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE), São Paulo 01504-001, Brazil)

  • Marlene Amorim

    (DEGEIT & GOVCOPP, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

  • Mário Rodrigues

    (ESTGA & IEETA, University of Aveiro, 3750-127 Águeda, Portugal)

  • Geraldo Oliveira Neto

    (Industrial Engineering Post-Graduation Program, Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE), São Paulo 01504-001, Brazil)

Abstract

Small enterprises negatively affect the environment due to the inadequate disposal of manufacturing and raw material wastes generated in production processes; in addition, small enterprises do not often adopt adequate environmental practices due to barriers that include the lack of investment capacity. However, the adoption of cleaner production results in economic and environmental gains. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate how Brazilian small metal mechanical enterprises can identify and overcome barriers with the aim of implementing cleaner production. The research method used multiple cases with data collected by means of interviews and observations. The results allowed us to conclude that cultural and technical barriers negatively affect the adoption of cleaner production in the small enterprises studied. However, cultural and technical barriers can be overcome by means of economic and environmental gains as well as through investment in employee training and in the acquisition of more efficient machines and equipment.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberto Leite & Marlene Amorim & Mário Rodrigues & Geraldo Oliveira Neto, 2019. "Overcoming Barriers for Adopting Cleaner Production: A Case Study in Brazilian Small Metal-Mechanic Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-14, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:17:p:4808-:d:263626
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/17/4808/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/17/4808/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fawzi Halila, 2007. "Networks as a means of supporting the adoption of organizational innovations in SMEs: the case of Environmental Management Systems (EMSs) based on ISO 14001," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(3), pages 167-181, July.
    2. Ritthoff, Michael & Rohn, Holger & Liedtke, Christa, 2002. "Calculating MIPS: Resource productivity of products and services," Wuppertal Spezial, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy, volume 27, number 27e.
    3. Charbel José Chiappetta Jabbour & Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa Jabbour & Kannan Govindan & Thiago Pignatti de Freitas & Davi Fouad Soubihia & Devika Kannan & Hengky Latan, 2016. "Barriers to the adoption of green operational practices at Brazilian companies: effects on green and operational performance," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(10), pages 3042-3058, May.
    4. Clemens, Bruce, 2006. "Economic incentives and small firms: Does it pay to be green?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(4), pages 492-500, April.
    5. Dasgupta, Nandini, 2000. "Environmental Enforcement and Small Industries in India: Reworking the Problem in the Poverty Context," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 28(5), pages 945-967, May.
    6. Frijns, Jos & Van Vliet, Bas, 1999. "Small-Scale Industry and Cleaner Production Strategies," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 967-983, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Walter Cardoso Satyro & Jose Celso Contador & Jose Luiz Contador & Marco Aurélio Fragomeni & Sonia Francisca de Paula Monken & Ana Freitas Ribeiro & Anderson Ferreira de Lima & Jansen Anderson Gomes &, 2021. "Implementing Industry 4.0 through Cleaner Production and Social Stakeholders: Holistic and Sustainable Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Yuguo Jiang & Min Li & Asante Dennis & Xin Liao & Enock Mintah Ampaw, 2022. "The Hotspots and Trends in the Literature on Cleaner Production: A Visualized Analysis Based on Citespace," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Olesya A. Buryakovskaya & Anna I. Kurbatova & Mikhail S. Vlaskin & George E. Valyano & Anatoly V. Grigorenko & Grayr N. Ambaryan & Aleksandr O. Dudoladov, 2022. "Waste to Hydrogen: Elaboration of Hydroreactive Materials from Magnesium-Aluminum Scrap," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-34, April.
    4. Camila Gramkow & Annela Anger-Kraavi, 2019. "Developing Green: A Case for the Brazilian Manufacturing Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-16, November.
    5. Geraldo Cardoso de Oliveira Neto & Auro de Jesus Cardoso Correia & Henrricco Nieves Pujol Tucci & Rosângela Andrade Pita Brancalhão Melatto & Marlene Amorim, 2023. "Reverse Chain for Electronic Waste to Promote Circular Economy in Brazil: A Survey on Electronics Manufacturers and Importers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-27, February.
    6. Geraldo Cardoso de Oliveira Neto & Roberto Rodrigues Leite & Wagner Cezar Lucato & Rosangela Maria Vanalle & Marlene Amorim & João Carlos Oliveira Matias & Vikas Kumar, 2022. "Overcoming Barriers to the Implementation of Cleaner Production in Small Enterprises in the Mechanics Industry: Exploring Economic Gains and Contributions for Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, March.
    7. Angélica Pigola & Priscila Rezende da Costa & Luísa Cagica Carvalho & Luciano Ferreira da Silva & Cláudia Terezinha Kniess & Emerson Antonio Maccari, 2021. "Artificial Intelligence-Driven Digital Technologies to the Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals: A Perspective from Brazil and Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-28, December.
    8. Patrícia Soares Lins & Asher Kiperstok & Rita Dione Araujo Cunha & Áurea Luiza Quixabeira Rosa e Silva Rapôso & Eugenio Andrés Díaz Merino & Sandro Fábio César, 2021. "(Re)layout as a Strategy for Implementing Cleaner Production: Proposal for a Furniture Industry Company," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-30, November.
    9. José Carlos Curvelo Santana & Amanda Carvalho Miranda & Luane Souza & Charles Lincoln Kenji Yamamura & Diego de Freitas Coelho & Elias Basile Tambourgi & Fernando Tobal Berssaneti & Linda Lee Ho, 2021. "Clean Production of Biofuel from Waste Cooking Oil to Reduce Emissions, Fuel Cost, and Respiratory Disease Hospitalizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-25, August.
    10. Walter Cardoso Satyro & Jose Celso Contador & Sonia Francisca de Paula Monken & Anderson Ferreira de Lima & Gilberto Gomes Soares Junior & Jansen Anderson Gomes & João Victor Silva Neves & José Robert, 2023. "Industry 4.0 Implementation Projects: The Cleaner Production Strategy—A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.
    11. André Felipe Henriques Librantz & Fábio Cosme Rodrigues dos Santos, 2023. "Intelligent Clustering Techniques for the Reduction of Chemicals in Water Treatment Plants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Akama, Erick Maiko & Lokina, Razack & Mkenda, Beatrice Kalinda, 2023. "Clean production and Employment Outcomes: An Eco-efficiency Firm Level Analysis in Kenya," African Journal of Economic Review, African Journal of Economic Review, vol. 11(2), March.
    2. Ana Labella-Fernández & M. Mar Serrano-Arcos & Belén Payán-Sánchez, 2021. "Firm Growth as a Driver of Sustainable Product Innovation: Mediation and Moderation Analysis. Evidence from Manufacturing Firms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-22, March.
    3. Jaryn Bradford & Evan D. G. Fraser, 2008. "Local authorities, climate change and small and medium enterprises: identifying effective policy instruments to reduce energy use and carbon emissions," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(3), pages 156-172, May.
    4. Durán-Romero, Gemma & López, Ana M. & Beliaeva, Tatiana & Ferasso, Marcos & Garonne, Christophe & Jones, Paul, 2020. "Bridging the gap between circular economy and climate change mitigation policies through eco-innovations and Quintuple Helix Model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    5. Kalaivani Jayaraman & Sreenivasan Jayashree & Magiswary Dorasamy, 2023. "The Effects of Green Innovations in Organizations: Influence of Stakeholders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-13, January.
    6. Maël Sommer & Karine Gauche, 2021. "Certification de groupe ISO 14001 et gestion des problèmes de durabilité en petite entreprise : une analyse lexicale du discours des agriculteurs," Post-Print hal-03791169, HAL.
    7. Angélique Catharina Elford & Claus-Heinrich Daub, 2019. "Solutions for SMEs Challenged by CSR: A Multiple Cases Approach in the Food Industry within the DACH-Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-31, August.
    8. Elisa Giuliani, 2016. "Human Rights and Corporate Social Responsibility in Developing Countries’ Industrial Clusters," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(1), pages 39-54, January.
    9. Jelena Spanjol & Leona Tam & Vivian Tam, 2015. "Employer–Employee Congruence in Environmental Values: An Exploration of Effects on Job Satisfaction and Creativity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 130(1), pages 117-130, August.
    10. Lorenzo Bruno Prataviera & Alessandro Creazza & Marco Melacini & Fabrizio Dallari, 2022. "Heading for Tomorrow: Resilience Strategies for Post-COVID-19 Grocery Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    11. Wojciech Przychodzen & Dante I. Leyva‐de la Hiz & Justyna Przychodzen, 2020. "First‐mover advantages in green innovation—Opportunities and threats for financial performance: A longitudinal analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 339-357, January.
    12. Garcés-Ayerbe, Concepción & Cañón-de-Francia, Joaquín, 2017. "The Relevance of Complementarities in the Study of the Economic Consequences of Environmental Proactivity: Analysis of the Moderating Effect of Innovation Efforts," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 21-30.
    13. Ha, Le Thanh & Nam, Pham Xuan & Thanh, To Trung, 2021. "Effects of Bribery on Firms' Environmental Innovation Adoption in Vietnam: Mediating Roles of Firms' Bargaining Power and Credit and Institutional Constraints," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    14. Mahabubur Rahman & Saqib Aziz & Mathew Hughes, 2020. "The product‐market performance benefits of environmental policy: Why customer awareness and firm innovativeness matter," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(5), pages 2001-2018, July.
    15. María del Mar Miras‐Rodríguez & Amalia Carrasco‐Gallego & Bernabé Escobar‐Pérez, 2015. "Are Socially Responsible Behaviors Paid Off Equally? A Cross‐cultural Analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(4), pages 237-256, July.
    16. Abbas Mardani & Dalia Streimikiene & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Fausto Cavallaro & Mehrbakhsh Nilashi & Ahmad Jusoh & Habib Zare, 2017. "Application of Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to Solve Environmental Sustainability Problems: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-65, October.
    17. Gaoussou DIARRA & Sébastien MARCHAND, 2011. "Does Pervasive Corruption Matter For Firm's Demand for Good Governance in Developing Countries?," Working Papers 201112, CERDI.
    18. Zhongju Liao & Manting Zhang & Xiaopeng Wang, 2019. "Do female directors influence firms' environmental innovation? The moderating role of ownership type," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1), pages 257-263, January.
    19. Lettenmeier, Michael & Gobel, Christine & Liedtke, Christa & Rohn, Holger & Teitscheid, Petra, 2012. "Material Footprint of a Sustainable Nutrition System in 2050 – Need for Dynamic Innovations in Production, Consumption and Politics," 2012 International European Forum, February 13-17, 2012, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 144983, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    20. Nelson Oliveira Stefanelli & Charbel José Chiappetta Jabbour & Lara Bartocci Liboni Amui & Jorge Henrique Caldeira de Oliveira & Hengky Latan & Pascal Paillé & Martin Hingley, 2021. "Unleashing proactive low‐carbon strategies through behavioral factors in biodiversity‐intensive sustainable supply chains: Mixed methodology," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2535-2555, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:17:p:4808-:d:263626. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.