IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i17p4630-d260936.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Better Earlier than Longer: First-Mover Advantage in Social Commerce Product Information Competition

Author

Listed:
  • Hui Li

    (Institute of Systems Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China)

  • Narisa Zhao

    (Institute of Systems Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China)

Abstract

Social commerce (SC) is a rapidly emerging branch of e-commerce. Effective information spread is the critical element in increasing the sales volume in this industry. However, few studies have explored the underlying mechanism and corresponding winning strategies from the perspective of information spread. This research fills the gap by using a simulation method. Combined with the Engel–Kollat–Blackwell (EKB) theory, we improved the Susceptible–Infected–Recovered (SIR) epidemic dissemination dynamic model to simulate the competitive information spread process on social commerce networks. Datasets collected from two of the biggest SC websites in China, Sina Weibo and Taobao, verified the accuracy of the proposed model. Parameter sensitivity analysis results indicated that releasing the product message earlier is more effective than increasing the spread duration for improving the performance of information diffusion so as to boost the sales volume. It was also shown that high discard probability destroys the sales volume caused by high purchase probability. Low discard probability can lead to a good sales volume eventually, even when the purchase probability is low. The results provide evidence for the First-Mover Advantage theory from the information spreading point of view. We come up with practical strategies for SC marketers based on the simulation results.

Suggested Citation

  • Hui Li & Narisa Zhao, 2019. "Better Earlier than Longer: First-Mover Advantage in Social Commerce Product Information Competition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-17, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:17:p:4630-:d:260936
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/17/4630/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/17/4630/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Youn Kue Na & Sungmin Kang, 2018. "Sustainable Diffusion of Fashion Information on Mobile Friends-Based Social Network Service," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-23, May.
    2. Lopez, Luis E. & Roberts, Edward B., 2002. "First-mover advantages in regimes of weak appropriability: the case of financial services innovations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(12), pages 997-1005, December.
    3. Catherine Baethge & Julia Klier & Mathias Klier, 2016. "Social commerce—state-of-the-art and future research directions," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 26(3), pages 269-290, August.
    4. Luisa Sturiale & Alessandro Scuderi, 2016. "The digital economy: new e-business strategies for food Italian system," International Journal of Electronic Marketing and Retailing, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(4), pages 287-310.
    5. Hajli, Nick & Sims, Julian, 2015. "Social commerce: The transfer of power from sellers to buyers," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 350-358.
    6. Zhao, Narisa & Cui, Xuelian, 2017. "Impact of individual interest shift on information dissemination in modular networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 466(C), pages 232-242.
    7. Hajli, Nick & Sims, Julian & Zadeh, Arash H. & Richard, Marie-Odile, 2017. "A social commerce investigation of the role of trust in a social networking site on purchase intentions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 133-141.
    8. Xicheng Yin & Hongwei Wang & Qiangwei Xia & Qican Gu, 2019. "How Social Interaction Affects Purchase Intention in Social Commerce: A Cultural Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, April.
    9. Yadav, Manjit S. & de Valck, Kristine & Hennig-Thurau, Thorsten & Hoffman, Donna L. & Spann, Martin, 2013. "Social Commerce: A Contingency Framework for Assessing Marketing Potential," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 311-323.
    10. Kee-Young Kwahk & Byoungsoo Kim, 2017. "Effects of social media on consumers’ purchase decisions: evidence from Taobao," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 11(4), pages 803-829, December.
    11. Eun Ea Lee & Hyunjeong Kang & Hyung Jun Ahn, 2017. "Word-of-Mouth of Cultural Products through Institutional Social Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-15, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jie Zhang & Lingfeng Dong & Ting Ji, 2023. "The Diffusion of Competitive Platform-Based Products with Network Effects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Aqeela Saleem & Javed Aslam & Yun Bae Kim & Shazia Nauman & Nokhaiz Tariq Khan, 2022. "Motives towards e-Shopping Adoption among Pakistani Consumers: An Application of the Technology Acceptance Model and Theory of Reasoned Action," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, March.
    3. Haili Zhang & Michael Song, 2020. "Do First-Movers in Marketing Sustainable Products Enjoy Sustainable Advantages? A Seven-Country Comparative Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-14, January.
    4. Lin-Lin Xue & Ching-Cheng Shen & Alastair M. Morrison & Li-Wen Kuo, 2021. "Online Tourist Behavior of the Net Generation: An Empirical Analysis in Taiwan Based on the AISAS Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yogesh K Dwivedi & Elvira Ismagilova & Prianka Sarker & Anand Jeyaraj & Yassine Jadil & Laurie Hughes, 2023. "A Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Model for Understanding Social Commerce Adoption," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 1421-1437, August.
    2. Jian Wang & Fakhar Shahzad & Zeeshan Ahmad & Muhammad Abdullah & Nadir Munir Hassan, 2022. "Trust and Consumers’ Purchase Intention in a Social Commerce Platform: A Meta-Analytic Approach," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.
    3. Hyun, Hyowon & Thavisay, Toulany & Lee, Suk Hyung, 2022. "Enhancing the role of flow experience in social media usage and its impact on shopping," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    4. Li, Chia-Ying, 2019. "How social commerce constructs influence customers' social shopping intention? An empirical study of a social commerce website," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 282-294.
    5. Mou, Jian & Benyoucef, Morad, 2021. "Consumer behavior in social commerce: Results from a meta-analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    6. Leong, Lai-Ying & Hew, Teck-Soon & Ooi, Keng-Boon & Chong, Alain Yee-Loong, 2020. "Predicting the antecedents of trust in social commerce – A hybrid structural equation modeling with neural network approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 24-40.
    7. Khalid, Komal & Shaikh, Mughees & Khan, Taha & Rana, Osama & Hussain, Faraz, 2020. "Factors Impacting Social Commerce Use Intention," MPRA Paper 104590, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Razaz Waheeb Attar & Ahlam Almusharraf & Areej Alfawaz & Nick Hajli, 2022. "New Trends in E-Commerce Research: Linking Social Commerce and Sharing Commerce: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-38, November.
    9. Tajvidi, Mina & Richard, Marie-Odile & Wang, YiChuan & Hajli, Nick, 2020. "Brand co-creation through social commerce information sharing: The role of social media," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 476-486.
    10. Jinjie Li & Jiayin Qi & Lianren Wu & Nan Shi & Xu Li & Yuxin Zhang & Yinyin Zheng, 2021. "The Continued Use of Social Commerce Platforms and Psychological Anxiety—The Roles of Influencers, Informational Incentives and FoMO," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-19, November.
    11. Marjeta Marolt & Hans-Dieter Zimmermann & Andreja Pucihar, 2022. "Social Media Use and Business Performance in SMEs: The Mediating Roles of Relational Social Commerce Capability and Competitive Advantage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-14, November.
    12. Enzo Bivona & Federico Cosenz, 2021. "Designing a Multi‐Sided Platform business model assessment framework: a Dynamic Performance Management perspective," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 93-107, January.
    13. Molinillo, Sebastian & Aguilar-Illescas, Rocío & Anaya-Sánchez, Rafael & Liébana-Cabanillas, Francisco, 2021. "Social commerce website design, perceived value and loyalty behavior intentions: The moderating roles of gender, age and frequency of use," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    14. Atchara Leeraphong & Borworn Papasratorn, 2018. "Business Models and Transactions in C2C Social Commerce: Practices of Selected Social Commerce Practitioners in Thailand," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(06), pages 1-28, December.
    15. Isaac Kofi Mensah & Guohua Zeng & Chuanyong Luo, 2023. "Determinants of Social Commerce Purchase and Recommendation Intentions Within the Context of Swift Guanxi Among Chinese College Students," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, June.
    16. Busalim, Abdelsalam H. & Hussin, Ab Razak Che, 2016. "Understanding social commerce: A systematic literature review and directions for further research," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 1075-1088.
    17. Sohn, Jeong Woong & Kim, Jin Ki, 2020. "Factors that influence purchase intentions in social commerce," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    18. Thomas Friedrich & Sebastian Schlauderer & Sven Overhage, 2021. "Some things are just better rich: how social commerce feature richness affects consumers’ buying intention via social factors," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(1), pages 159-180, March.
    19. Forbes MAKUDZA & Maxwell SANDADA & David D. MADZIKANDA, 2022. "Modelling Social Commerce Buying Behaviour: An Adaption Of The Sequential Consumer Decision Making Model," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(1), pages 17-29, March.
    20. Shirazi, Farid & Hajli, Nick & Sims, Julian & Lemke, Fred, 2022. "The role of social factors in purchase journey in the social commerce era," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:17:p:4630-:d:260936. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.