IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i12p3315-d240130.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application Status of Co-Processing Municipal Sewage Sludge in Cement Kilns in China

Author

Listed:
  • Jingcheng Xu

    (College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
    Shanghai Institute of Pollution Control and Ecological Security, Shanghai 200092, China
    Key Laboratory of Yangtze River Water Environment, Ministry of Education, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Li Ping

    (College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Haihua Cao

    (College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Wei Liu

    (College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Yunhui Gu

    (College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Xiaohu Lin

    (College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Juwen Huang

    (College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
    Key Laboratory of Yangtze River Water Environment, Ministry of Education, Shanghai 200092, China)

Abstract

Municipal sewage sludge (MSS) disposal is an urgent issue in China with the continuous growth of sewage treatment capacity. Among various disposal methods, co-processing of MSS in cement kilns has been one of the most promising disposal methods in recent years. The present situation of sewage treatment and sludge disposal, the development of co-processing MSS in a cement kiln, and main disposal routes in China were discussed in this study. The results indicated that China had paid considerable attention to the technology and released correlative policies in the past few years. There were about 35 co-processing projects built in China, all of which were limited by construction scale and pollutant emissions. Due to differences in construction methods and economic conditions, China’s co-processing projects mainly employed three routes—direct addition to a transition chamber, addition to a precalciner after direct thermal drying, and addition to a precalciner after indirect drying. Summarizing and analyzing the characteristics of MSS co-processing would facilitate its development in China and similar regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Jingcheng Xu & Li Ping & Haihua Cao & Wei Liu & Yunhui Gu & Xiaohu Lin & Juwen Huang, 2019. "Application Status of Co-Processing Municipal Sewage Sludge in Cement Kilns in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-7, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:12:p:3315-:d:240130
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/12/3315/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/12/3315/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tyagi, Vinay Kumar & Lo, Shang-Lien, 2013. "Sludge: A waste or renewable source for energy and resources recovery?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 708-728.
    2. Zuxin Xu & Jin Xu & Hailong Yin & Wei Jin & Huaizheng Li & Zhen He, 2019. "Urban river pollution control in developing countries," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 2(3), pages 158-160, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ukrit Suksanguan & Somsak Siwadamrongpong & Thanapong Champahom & Sajjakaj Jomnonkwao & Tassana Boonyoo & Vatanavongs Ratanavaraha, 2022. "Structural Equation Model of Factors Influencing the Selection of Industrial Waste Disposal Service in Cement Kilns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-19, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Claire Villette & Loïc Maurer & Julie Zumsteg & Jérôme Mutterer & Adrien Wanko & Dimitri Heintz, 2023. "Mass spectrometry imaging for biosolids characterization to assess ecological or health risks before reuse," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Meng, Xiangmei & de Jong, Wiebren & Kudra, Tadeusz, 2016. "A state-of-the-art review of pulse combustion: Principles, modeling, applications and R&D issues," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 73-114.
    3. Shahbeig, Hossein & Nosrati, Mohsen, 2020. "Pyrolysis of municipal sewage sludge for bioenergy production: Thermo-kinetic studies, evolved gas analysis, and techno-socio-economic assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    4. Arbulú, Italo & Lozano, Javier & Rey-Maquieira, Javier, 2017. "The challenges of tourism to waste-to-energy public-private partnerships," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 916-921.
    5. Daniel Ddiba & Kim Andersson & Arno Rosemarin & Helfrid Schulte-Herbrüggen & Sarah Dickin, 2022. "The circular economy potential of urban organic waste streams in low- and middle-income countries," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 1116-1144, January.
    6. Fabio Merzari & Jillian Goldfarb & Gianni Andreottola & Tanja Mimmo & Maurizio Volpe & Luca Fiori, 2020. "Hydrothermal Carbonization as a Strategy for Sewage Sludge Management: Influence of Process Withdrawal Point on Hydrochar Properties," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, June.
    7. Radoslaw Slezak & Hilal Unyay & Szymon Szufa & Stanislaw Ledakowicz, 2023. "An Extensive Review and Comparison of Modern Biomass Reactors Torrefaction vs. Biomass Pyrolizers—Part 2," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-25, February.
    8. Farhad Beik & Leon Williams & Tim Brown & Stuart T. Wagland, 2021. "Managing Non-Sewered Human Waste Using Thermochemical Waste Treatment Technologies: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-22, November.
    9. Severo, Ihana Aguiar & Siqueira, Stefania Fortes & Deprá, Mariany Costa & Maroneze, Mariana Manzoni & Zepka, Leila Queiroz & Jacob-Lopes, Eduardo, 2019. "Biodiesel facilities: What can we address to make biorefineries commercially competitive?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 686-705.
    10. Yan-Jhang Chen & Tang-Yu Fan & Li-Pang Wang & Ta-Wui Cheng & Shiao-Shing Chen & Min-Hao Yuan & Shikun Cheng, 2020. "Application of Fenton Method for the Removal of Organic Matter in Sewage Sludge at Room Temperature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-10, February.
    11. Xiaonan Ji & Jianghai Chen & Yali Guo, 2022. "A Multi-Dimensional Investigation on Water Quality of Urban Rivers with Emphasis on Implications for the Optimization of Monitoring Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-18, March.
    12. Reijnders, L., 2014. "Phosphorus resources, their depletion and conservation, a review," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 32-49.
    13. Sandylove Afrane & Jeffrey Dankwa Ampah & Ephraim Bonah Agyekum & Prince Oppong Amoh & Abdulfatah Abdu Yusuf & Islam Md Rizwanul Fattah & Ebenezer Agbozo & Elmazeg Elgamli & Mokhtar Shouran & Guozhu M, 2022. "Integrated AHP-TOPSIS under a Fuzzy Environment for the Selection of Waste-To-Energy Technologies in Ghana: A Performance Analysis and Socio-Enviro-Economic Feasibility Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-31, July.
    14. Eui-Hwan Hong & Jun-Gyu Park & Beom Lee & Wei-Qi Shi & Hang-Bae Jun, 2019. "Improvement of Waste Dehydrated Sludge for Anaerobic Digestion through High-Temperature and High-Pressure Solubilization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    15. Inesa Kniuipytė & Marius Praspaliauskas & Jonė Venclovienė & Jūratė Žaltauskaitė, 2023. "Soil Remediation after Sewage Sludge or Sewage Sludge Char Application with Industrial Hemp and Its Potential for Bioenergy Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-17, July.
    16. Wu, Haijun & Li, Xinlong & Zhang, Quan & Zhang, Kai & Xu, Xia & Xu, Jian, 2022. "Promoting the conversion of poplar to bio-oil based on the synergistic effect of alkaline hydrogen peroxide," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 107-117.
    17. Liu, Huan & Yi, Linlin & Zhang, Qiang & Hu, Hongyun & Lu, Geng & Li, Aijun & Yao, Hong, 2016. "Co-production of clean syngas and ash adsorbent during sewage sludge gasification: Synergistic effect of Fenton peroxidation and CaO conditioning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1062-1068.
    18. Semiyaga, Swaib & Okure, Mackay A.E. & Niwagaba, Charles B. & Katukiza, Alex Y. & Kansiime, Frank, 2015. "Decentralized options for faecal sludge management in urban slum areas of Sub-Saharan Africa: A review of technologies, practices and end-uses," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 104(PA), pages 109-119.
    19. Do, Truong Xuan & Lim, Young-il & Cho, Hyodeuk & Shim, Jaehui & Yoo, Jeongkeun & Rho, Kyutai & Choi, Seong-Geun & Park, Chanwoo & Park, Byeong-Yun, 2018. "Techno-economic analysis of fry-drying and torrefaction plant for bio-solid fuel production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 45-53.
    20. Nazari, Laleh & Yuan, Zhongshun & Ray, Madhumita B. & Xu, Chunbao (Charles), 2017. "Co-conversion of waste activated sludge and sawdust through hydrothermal liquefaction: Optimization of reaction parameters using response surface methodology," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 1-10.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:12:p:3315-:d:240130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.