IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i8p2714-d161460.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Daylighting and Energy Performance Evaluation of an Egg-Crate Device for Hospital Building Retrofitting in a Mediterranean Climate

Author

Listed:
  • Carmen María Calama-González

    (Instituto Universitario de Arquitectura y Ciencias de la Construcción, Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura, Universidad de Sevilla, Av. Reina Mercedes 2, 410012 Seville, Spain)

  • Ángel Luis León-Rodríguez

    (Instituto Universitario de Arquitectura y Ciencias de la Construcción, Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura, Universidad de Sevilla, Av. Reina Mercedes 2, 410012 Seville, Spain)

  • Rafael Suárez

    (Instituto Universitario de Arquitectura y Ciencias de la Construcción, Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura, Universidad de Sevilla, Av. Reina Mercedes 2, 410012 Seville, Spain)

Abstract

Hospital buildings present a significant savings potential in order to meet the objectives of H2020. The improvement of healthcare built environments contributes to improving the health of patients. In this respect, passive measurements must be prioritized, especially in relation to the weakest element of the building thermal enclosure: the window opening. Shading devices allow solar radiation and indoor temperature to be controlled, as well as improving visual comfort, mostly in buildings with a Mediterranean climate. This factor is of great importance when considering the increase in outdoor temperatures expected due to climate change. Unlike other studies in which predictive models are implemented, this paper examines a methodology based on the simultaneous monitoring of ambient variables, in real use and operative conditions, for two hospital rooms located in southern Spain. The aim of this research is to provide a comparative assessment of ambient conditions in a standard room with an egg-crate device and in a non-shaded one. The use of an egg-crate device allows a better yearly performance, improving natural illuminance levels, reducing incident solar radiation on the window, and decreasing artificial lighting consumption. However, its efficiency is greatly conditioned by the user patterns in relation to ambient systems, as the blind aperture level and the activation of the lighting system are directly controlled by users.

Suggested Citation

  • Carmen María Calama-González & Ángel Luis León-Rodríguez & Rafael Suárez, 2018. "Daylighting and Energy Performance Evaluation of an Egg-Crate Device for Hospital Building Retrofitting in a Mediterranean Climate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-17, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:8:p:2714-:d:161460
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/8/2714/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/8/2714/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ángel Luis León-Rodríguez & Rafael Suárez & Pedro Bustamante & Miguel Ángel Campano & David Moreno-Rangel, 2017. "Design and Performance of Test Cells as an Energy Evaluation Model of Facades in a Mediterranean Building Area," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Kirimtat, Ayca & Koyunbaba, Basak Kundakci & Chatzikonstantinou, Ioannis & Sariyildiz, Sevil, 2016. "Review of simulation modeling for shading devices in buildings," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 23-49.
    3. Cristina Carletti & Fabio Sciurpi & Leone Pierangioli, 2014. "The Energy Upgrading of Existing Buildings: Window and Shading Device Typologies for Energy Efficiency Refurbishment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(8), pages 1-24, August.
    4. Buonomano, Annamaria & Calise, Francesco & Ferruzzi, Gabriele & Palombo, Adolfo, 2014. "Dynamic energy performance analysis: Case study for energy efficiency retrofits of hospital buildings," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 555-572.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Allen Jong-Woei Whang & Tsai-Hsien Yang & Zhong-Hao Deng & Yi-Yung Chen & Wei-Chieh Tseng & Chun-Han Chou, 2019. "A Review of Daylighting System: For Prototype Systems Performance and Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-34, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carmen María Calama-González & Rafael Suárez & Ángel Luis León-Rodríguez, 2018. "Thermal and Lighting Consumption Savings in Classrooms Retrofitted with Shading Devices in a Hot Climate," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Yao Lu & Hankun Lin & Siwei Liu & Yiqiang Xiao, 2019. "Nonuniform Woven Solar Shading Screens: Shading, Mechanical, and Daylighting Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-19, October.
    3. Abdelhakim Mesloub & Aritra Ghosh & Mabrouk Touahmia & Ghazy Abdullah Albaqawy & Emad Noaime & Badr M. Alsolami, 2020. "Performance Analysis of Photovoltaic Integrated Shading Devices (PVSDs) and Semi-Transparent Photovoltaic (STPV) Devices Retrofitted to a Prototype Office Building in a Hot Desert Climate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Cho, Hyun Mi & Yang, Sungwoong & Wi, Seunghwan & Chang, Seong Jin & Kim, Sumin, 2020. "Hygrothermal and energy retrofit planning of masonry façade historic building used as museum and office: A cultural properties case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    5. Calise, Francesco & Dentice d'Accadia, Massimo & Libertini, Luigi & Quiriti, Edoardo & Vicidomini, Maria, 2017. "A novel tool for thermoeconomic analysis and optimization of trigeneration systems: A case study for a hospital building in Italy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 64-87.
    6. Sara Brito-Coimbra & Daniel Aelenei & Maria Gloria Gomes & Antonio Moret Rodrigues, 2021. "Building Façade Retrofit with Solar Passive Technologies: A Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.
    7. Maria Psillaki & Nikolaos Apostolopoulos & Ilias Makris & Panagiotis Liargovas & Sotiris Apostolopoulos & Panos Dimitrakopoulos & George Sklias, 2023. "Hospitals’ Energy Efficiency in the Perspective of Saving Resources and Providing Quality Services through Technological Options: A Systematic Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-21, January.
    8. Hassan Bazazzadeh & Barbara Świt-Jankowska & Nasim Fazeli & Adam Nadolny & Behnaz Safar ali najar & Seyedeh sara Hashemi safaei & Mohammadjavad Mahdavinejad, 2021. "Efficient Shading Device as an Important Part of Daylightophil Architecture; a Designerly Framework of High-Performance Architecture for an Office Building in Tehran," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-26, December.
    9. Anna Laura Pisello, 2015. "Experimental Analysis of Cool Traditional Solar Shading Systems for Residential Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-14, March.
    10. Carmen María Calama-González & Rafael Suárez & Ángel Luis León-Rodríguez & Samuel Domínguez-Amarillo, 2018. "Evaluation of Thermal Comfort Conditions in Retrofitted Facades Using Test Cells and Considering Overheating Scenarios in a Mediterranean Climate," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, March.
    11. Han Yang & Koki Kikuta & Motoya Hayashi, 2022. "Research on Carbon Reduction of Residential Buildings in Severe Cold Regions Based on Renovation of Envelopes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-19, March.
    12. Calise, Francesco & Dentice d'Accadia, Massimo & Figaj, Rafal Damian & Vanoli, Laura, 2016. "A novel solar-assisted heat pump driven by photovoltaic/thermal collectors: Dynamic simulation and thermoeconomic optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 346-366.
    13. Dong-Seok Lee & Jae-Hun Jo & Sung-Han Koo & Byung-Yun Lee, 2015. "Development of Climate Indices Using Local Weather Data for Shading Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-16, February.
    14. Marchini, F. & Chiatti, C. & Fabiani, C. & Pisello, A.L., 2023. "Development of an innovative translucent–photoluminescent coating for smart windows applications: An experimental and numerical investigation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    15. Cristina Carletti & Leone Pierangioli & Fabio Sciurpi & Andrea Salvietti, 2018. "Comparison among Detailed and Simplified Calculation Methods for Thermal and Energy Assessment of the Building Envelope and the Shadings of a New Wooden nZEB House," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-21, February.
    16. Louise Sawyer & Simon Kemp & Patrick James & Michael Harper, 2021. "Assessment of a Nurse Led Energy Behavior Change Intervention in an NHS Community Hospital Ward," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
    17. Capozzoli, Alfonso & Piscitelli, Marco Savino & Neri, Francesco & Grassi, Daniele & Serale, Gianluca, 2016. "A novel methodology for energy performance benchmarking of buildings by means of Linear Mixed Effect Model: The case of space and DHW heating of out-patient Healthcare Centres," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 592-607.
    18. Sara Ghaem Sigarchian & Anders Malmquist & Viktoria Martin, 2018. "Design Optimization of a Complex Polygeneration System for a Hospital," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-24, April.
    19. Bustamante, Waldo & Uribe, Daniel & Vera, Sergio & Molina, Germán, 2017. "An integrated thermal and lighting simulation tool to support the design process of complex fenestration systems for office buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 36-48.
    20. Calise, Francesco & Figaj, Rafal Damian & Massarotti, Nicola & Mauro, Alessandro & Vanoli, Laura, 2017. "Polygeneration system based on PEMFC, CPVT and electrolyzer: Dynamic simulation and energetic and economic analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 530-542.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:8:p:2714-:d:161460. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.