IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i8p2636-d160224.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Dedication-Based and Constraint-Based Mechanisms in Consumers’ Sustainable Outcomes in the Coffee Chain Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Byoungsoo Kim

    (School of Business, Yeungnam University, 280 Daehakro, Gyeongsansi 38541, Korea)

Abstract

Given the increase in consumers’ preferences for coffee, it is becoming important to understand their decision-making processes in the coffee chain context. To deepen the understanding of sustainable outcomes in this context, this study investigates the role of dedication- and constraint-based mechanisms in forming consumers’ repurchase and positive word-of-mouth (WOM) intentions, two critical sustainable outcomes. We examined the effects of coffee quality, the quality of the physical environment, and service quality in accelerating the formation of dedication-based factors. Moreover, this study offers an in-depth understanding of the enablers of perceived switching costs. Data collected from 238 university students that frequently visit coffee chains were empirically tested against the proposed theoretical framework by using structural equation modeling. The results confirm that both dedication- and constraint-based factors substantially predict consumers’ sustainable outcomes in the coffee chain context. Brand image and perceived switching costs play an important role in enhancing consumers’ repurchase and positive WOM intentions compared with customer satisfaction. Coffee quality is significantly associated with both customer satisfaction and brand image, whereas the quality of the physical environment and service quality are only significantly associated with brand image. Habit is found to be the key enabler of perceived switching costs, while loyalty programs have no significant impact on perceived switching costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Byoungsoo Kim, 2018. "The Role of Dedication-Based and Constraint-Based Mechanisms in Consumers’ Sustainable Outcomes in the Coffee Chain Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-17, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:8:p:2636-:d:160224
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/8/2636/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/8/2636/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yingtao Shen & Shenyu Li & Michelle DeMoss, 2012. "The Effect Of Quantitative Electronic Word Of Mouth On Consumer Perceived Product Quality," International Journal of Management and Marketing Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 5(2), pages 19-29.
    2. Yu-Te Tu & Hsiao-Chien Chang, 2012. "Corporate Brand Image and Customer Satisfaction on Loyalty: An Empirical Study of Starbucks Coffee in Taiwan," Journal of Social and Development Sciences, AMH International, vol. 3(1), pages 24-32.
    3. Woisetschläger, David M. & Lentz, Patrick & Evanschitzky, Heiner, 2011. "How habits, social ties, and economic switching barriers affect customer loyalty in contractual service settings," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(8), pages 800-808, August.
    4. Lars Meyer-Waarden & Christophe Benavent, 2009. "Grocery retail loyalty program effects: self-selection or purchase behavior change?," Post-Print hal-01913030, HAL.
    5. Yi-Chung Hu & Ping-Chuan Lee & Yuh-Shy Chuang & Yu-Jing Chiu, 2018. "Improving the Sustainable Competitiveness of Service Quality within Air Cargo Terminals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, July.
    6. Ben Q. Liu & Dale L. Goodhue, 2012. "Two Worlds of Trust for Potential E-Commerce Users: Humans as Cognitive Misers," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 1246-1262, December.
    7. Md. Alamgir Hossain & Minho Kim, 2018. "Does Multidimensional Service Quality Generate Sustainable Use Intention for Facebook?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Asım Dinler & Tarık Atan & Aysen Berberoglu, 2022. "Factors Affecting the Sustained Market Position of TV Channels: Insights from Audience Preferences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Daekil Kim & Byoungsoo Kim, 2018. "An Integrative View of Emotion and the Dedication-Constraint Model in the Case of Coffee Chain Retailers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, November.
    3. Luis Enrique Valdez-Juárez & Nicolas Salvador Beltramino & Roberto Limón-Ulloa & Elva Alicia Ramos-Escobar, 2020. "The Quality of the Service, Superior Value Generator in the Restaurant Sector," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(3), pages 1-87, March.
    4. Dariusz Dudek & Marcin Lipowski & Ilona Bondos, 2021. "Changing Energy Supplier on the Market with a Strong Position of Incumbent Suppliers—Polish Example," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-16, June.
    5. Byoungsoo Kim, 2019. "Understanding Key Antecedents of Consumer Loyalty toward Sharing-Economy Platforms: The Case of Airbnb," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-15, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yibei Pu & Norzaidahwati Zaidin & Yaodong Zhu, 2023. "How Do E-Brand Experience and In-Store Experience Influence the Brand Loyalty of Novel Coffee Brands in China? Exploring the Roles of Customer Satisfaction and Self–Brand Congruity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Youn Kue Na & Sungmin Kang, 2018. "Sustainable Diffusion of Fashion Information on Mobile Friends-Based Social Network Service," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-23, May.
    3. Chun-Hsi Vivian Chen & Yu-Cheng Chen, 2021. "Assessment of Enhancing Employee Engagement in Energy-Saving Behavior at Workplace: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, February.
    4. Chen, Yanyan & Mandler, Timo & Meyer-Waarden, Lars, 2021. "Three decades of research on loyalty programs: A literature review and future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 179-197.
    5. Bruneau, Virginie & Swaen, Valérie & Zidda, Pietro, 2018. "Are loyalty program members really engaged? Measuring customer engagement with loyalty programs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 144-158.
    6. Faramarzi, Ashkan & Bhattacharya, Abhi, 2021. "The economic worth of loyalty programs: An event study analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 313-323.
    7. Angelito Calma & José Martí-Parreño & Martin Davies, 2019. "Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 1973–2018: an analytical retrospective," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 119(2), pages 879-908, May.
    8. Kee-Young Kwahk & Byoungsoo Kim, 2017. "Effects of social media on consumers’ purchase decisions: evidence from Taobao," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 11(4), pages 803-829, December.
    9. Aloy Okafor & Olusoji George, 2016. "Theorising the Concept of Product Branding: A Qualitative Approach to the History of Branding; the Case of the Nigerian Milk Industry," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(2), pages 84-96, April.
    10. Bies, Suzanne M.T.A. & Bronnenberg, Bart J. & Gijsbrechts, Els, 2021. "How push messaging impacts consumer spending and reward redemption in store-loyalty programs," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 877-899.
    11. Balmer, John M.T. & Lin, Zhibin & Chen, Weifeng & He, Xinming, 2020. "The role of corporate brand image for B2B relationships of logistics service providers in China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 850-861.
    12. Heesup Han & Hyoungeun Moon & Antonio Ariza-Montes & Soyeun Lee, 2020. "Sensory/Health-Related and Convenience/Process Quality of Airline Meals and Traveler Loyalty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, January.
    13. Yunju Kim & Heejun Lee, 2021. "Motivation and Reuse: How Does Motivation Affect Sustainable Use Intention for Brand Webtoons?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-13, February.
    14. Fan, Xiaojun & Chai, Zeli & Deng, Nianqi & Dong, Xuebing, 2020. "Adoption of augmented reality in online retailing and consumers’ product attitude: A cognitive perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    15. Bies, Suzanne, 2022. "Examining the effectiveness of activation techniques on consumer behavior in temporary loyalty programs," Other publications TiSEM ade86df3-4846-4318-938f-a, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    16. Amna Javed & Shazaib Khan, 2014. "Consumer perception of brand trust online of clothing in Karachi: A case study of Gul Ahmed," Journal of Management Sciences, Geist Science, Iqra University, Faculty of Business Administration, vol. 1(1), pages 61-72, March.
    17. Hussin Elansari & Ahmad Alzubi & Amir Khadem, 2024. "The Impact of United Nations Sustainable Development Goals on Customers’ Perceptions and Loyalty in the Banking Sector: A Multi-Mediation Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-24, September.
    18. Nogata, Daisuke, 2022. "Determinants of household switching between natural gas suppliers: Evidence from Japan," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    19. Vikas Singla & Harpreet Rai, 2016. "Investigating the effects of retail agglomeration choice behavior on store attractiveness," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(2), pages 108-124, July.
    20. Tsu-Ming Yeh & Shun-Hsing Chen & Tsen-Fei Chen, 2019. "The Relationships among Experiential Marketing, Service Innovation, and Customer Satisfaction—A Case Study of Tourism Factories in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-12, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:8:p:2636-:d:160224. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.