IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i7p2554-d159122.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study on Policy Marking of Passive Level Insulation Standards for Non-Residential Buildings in South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Yeweon Kim

    (Building and Urban Research Institute, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, Ilsan 10223, Korea)

  • Ki-Hyung Yu

    (Building and Urban Research Institute, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, Ilsan 10223, Korea)

Abstract

This study presented a methodology and process to establish a passive level for policy making of building energy in South Korea. A passive level in Korea specified in the 2017 Roadmap for non-residential buildings, which was 15 kWh/m 2 ·year, was defined as the heating energy requirement to strengthen the building energy saving design standards, which were typical building energy regulations in Korea. This study also presented insulation standards of roofs, floors, outer walls, and windows in Pyeongchang, Seoul, Gwangju, and Jeju, which were represented cities of four zones in Korea (Middle 1, Middle 2, Southern, and Jeju). Furthermore, the study results were extended to 66 cities around the nation to calculate the heating energy requirements and a severely cold region was added to existing three regions (Middle, Southern, and Jeju) to extend this to four regions (Middle 1, Middle 2, Southern, and Jeju). Afterwards, insulation standards for four represented regions were presented to derive a measure that minimized an energy loss through outer walls or windows in buildings. Finally, this study derived that a return of investment can be achieved in 10 years, which was determined through the comprehensive economic feasibility analysis due to strengthening insulation performances, proving the rationalization of the legal strengthening.

Suggested Citation

  • Yeweon Kim & Ki-Hyung Yu, 2018. "Study on Policy Marking of Passive Level Insulation Standards for Non-Residential Buildings in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:7:p:2554-:d:159122
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/7/2554/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/7/2554/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andaloro, Antonio P.F. & Salomone, Roberta & Ioppolo, Giuseppe & Andaloro, Laura, 2010. "Energy certification of buildings: A comparative analysis of progress towards implementation in European countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 5840-5866, October.
    2. Duk Joon Park & Ki Hyung Yu & Yong Sang Yoon & Kee Han Kim & Sun Sook Kim, 2015. "Analysis of a Building Energy Efficiency Certification System in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-22, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Uk-Joo Sung & Seok-Hyun Kim, 2019. "Development of a Passive and Active Technology Package Standard and Database for Application to Zero Energy Buildings in South Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-23, May.
    2. Domenico Mazzeo & Giuseppe Oliveti, 2020. "Advanced Innovative Solutions for Final Design in Terms of Energy Sustainability of Nearly/Net Zero Energy Buildings (nZEB)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-5, December.
    3. Seongjo Wang & Sungho Tae & Hyeongjae Jang, 2021. "Prediction of the Energy Self-Sufficiency Rate of Major New Renewable Energy Types Based on Zero-Energy Building Certification Cases in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-15, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mustaffa, Nur Kamaliah & Kudus, Sakhiah Abdul, 2022. "Challenges and way forward towards best practices of energy efficient building in Malaysia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    2. Hye Gi Kim & Sun Sook Kim, 2020. "Occupants’ Awareness of and Satisfaction with Green Building Technologies in a Certified Office Building," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, March.
    3. Kim, Min-Hwi & Kim, Deukwon & Heo, Jaehyeok & Lee, Dong-Won, 2020. "Energy performance investigation of net plus energy town: Energy balance of the Jincheon Eco-Friendly energy town," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 1784-1800.
    4. Francisco Sanhueza-Durán & José M. Gómez-Soberón & Claudia Valderrama-Ulloa & Felipe Ossio, 2019. "A Comparison of Energy Efficiency Certification in Housing: A Study of the Chilean and Spanish Cases," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-16, September.
    5. Dario Cottafava & Giulia Sonetti & Paolo Gambino & Andrea Tartaglino, 2018. "Explorative Multidimensional Analysis for Energy Efficiency: DataViz versus Clustering Algorithms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, May.
    6. Lee, Junghun & Yoo, Seunghwan & Kim, Jonghun & Song, Doosam & Jeong, Hakgeun, 2018. "Improvements to the customer baseline load (CBL) using standard energy consumption considering energy efficiency and demand response," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 1052-1063.
    7. Lee, Junsoo & Kim, Tae Wan & Koo, Choongwan, 2022. "A novel process model for developing a scalable room-level energy benchmark using real-time bigdata: Focused on identifying representative energy usage patterns," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    8. Antonio Attanasio & Marco Savino Piscitelli & Silvia Chiusano & Alfonso Capozzoli & Tania Cerquitelli, 2019. "Towards an Automated, Fast and Interpretable Estimation Model of Heating Energy Demand: A Data-Driven Approach Exploiting Building Energy Certificates," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-25, April.
    9. Annunziata, Eleonora & Frey, Marco & Rizzi, Francesco, 2013. "Towards nearly zero-energy buildings: The state-of-art of national regulations in Europe," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 125-133.
    10. Duk Joon Park & Ki Hyung Yu & Yong Sang Yoon & Kee Han Kim & Sun Sook Kim, 2015. "Analysis of a Building Energy Efficiency Certification System in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-22, December.
    11. Kok, Nils & Jennen, Maarten, 2012. "The impact of energy labels and accessibility on office rents," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 489-497.
    12. Min-Suk Jo & Jang-Hoon Shin & Won-Jun Kim & Jae-Weon Jeong, 2017. "Energy-Saving Benefits of Adiabatic Humidification in the Air Conditioning Systems of Semiconductor Cleanrooms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-23, November.
    13. Franke, Melanie & Nadler, Claudia, 2019. "Energy efficiency in the German residential housing market: Its influence on tenants and owners," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 879-890.
    14. Hye Gi Kim & Hyun Jun Kim & Chae Hwan Jeon & Myeong Won Chae & Young Hum Cho & Sun Sook Kim, 2020. "Analysis of Energy Saving Effect and Cost Efficiency of ECMs to Upgrade the Building Energy Code," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-22, September.
    15. Min Ho Shin & Hwan Yong Kim & Donghwan Gu & Hyoungsub Kim, 2017. "LEED, Its Efficacy and Fallacy in a Regional Context—An Urban Heat Island Case in California," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-11, September.
    16. Verbeke, Stijn & Audenaert, Amaryllis, 2018. "Thermal inertia in buildings: A review of impacts across climate and building use," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2300-2318.
    17. Eunyoung Kim & Eunkyoung Hwang, 2017. "Analysis of the Current Scoring Distribution by Evaluation Criteria in Korean Long-Life Housing Certification System Cases," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-20, October.
    18. Jolanta Šadauskienė & Valdas Paukštys & Lina Šeduikytė & Karolis Banionis, 2014. "Impact of Air Tightness on the Evaluation of Building Energy Performance in Lithuania," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-16, August.
    19. Afonso Miguel Solak & Antonio José Tenza-Abril & José Miguel Saval & Victoria Eugenia García-Vera, 2018. "Effects of Multiple Supplementary Cementitious Materials on Workability and Segregation Resistance of Lightweight Aggregate Concrete," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-14, November.
    20. Dascalaki, E.G. & Balaras, C.A. & Gaglia, A.G. & Droutsa, K.G. & Kontoyiannidis, S., 2012. "Energy performance of buildings—EPBD in Greece," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 469-477.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:7:p:2554-:d:159122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.