IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i10p1794-d114009.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of the Current Scoring Distribution by Evaluation Criteria in Korean Long-Life Housing Certification System Cases

Author

Listed:
  • Eunyoung Kim

    (Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, 283, Goyangdae-ro, Goyang-si 10223, Korea)

  • Eunkyoung Hwang

    (Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, 283, Goyangdae-ro, Goyang-si 10223, Korea)

Abstract

Peoples lifestyles are diversifying due to an increase in the types of residents housing and family structures. The ratio of apartment housing in Korea was 59.9% (9806 households) in 2015, and this type accounts for the largest ratio among all housing types. However, the life of the physical housing is approximately 30–40 years, which is relatively shorter in comparison to that of overseas houses. Therefore, the certification system for long-life housing, which had longer social and physical service life, was newly established in 24 December 2014. However, all apartment houses only acquired the normal grade (grade 4). The purpose of this study is to investigate all long-life housing certification cases and analyze the acquired score and status of each evaluation item. The total number of certification cases was 283, and the data analysis and FGI (Focus Group Interview) investigation method were used as the methods of study. As a result of analysis and summary, 173 cases (61.13%) received 50 points and 106 cases (37.46%) received 51 points. All these cases were considered normal grade. The result of this study is as follows. First, a system to maintain the long-life housing certification system operation agency is necessary. Second, the reason for an item with no score was the evasion by construction companies due to an increase in both the construction expense and sale price. Therefore, various incentive plans are necessary and should be executed accordingly. Third, it is necessary to improve the detailed evaluation standards of the certification system and reexamine its scoring system. Long-life housing is a housing type in preparation for changes in the residential environment in future. The significance of this study is that the content shall be utilized as preliminary data for improving the system through the analysis of evaluation items in the certification system.

Suggested Citation

  • Eunyoung Kim & Eunkyoung Hwang, 2017. "Analysis of the Current Scoring Distribution by Evaluation Criteria in Korean Long-Life Housing Certification System Cases," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-20, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:10:p:1794-:d:114009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/10/1794/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/10/1794/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hyde, Abbey & Howlett, Etaoine & Brady, Dympna & Drennan, Jonathan, 2005. "The focus group method: Insights from focus group interviews on sexual health with adolescents," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(12), pages 2588-2599, December.
    2. Dubois, Maarten & Allacker, Karen, 2015. "Energy savings from housing: Ineffective renovation subsidies vs efficient demolition and reconstruction incentives," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 697-704.
    3. Lee, Nayoon & Tae, Sungho & Gong, Yuri & Roh, Seungjun, 2017. "Integrated building life-cycle assessment model to support South Korea's green building certification system (G-SEED)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 43-50.
    4. Jungwon Yoon & Jiyoung Park, 2015. "Comparative Analysis of Material Criteria in Neighborhood Sustainability Assessment Tools and Urban Design Guidelines: Cases of the UK, the US, Japan, and Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-38, October.
    5. Jin Ouk Choi & Ankit Bhatla & Christopher M. Stoppel & Jennifer S. Shane, 2015. "LEED Credit Review System and Optimization Model for Pursuing LEED Certification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-27, September.
    6. Miyeon Park & Sungho Tae, 2016. "Suggestions of Policy Direction to Improve the Housing Quality in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-26, May.
    7. Duk Joon Park & Ki Hyung Yu & Yong Sang Yoon & Kee Han Kim & Sun Sook Kim, 2015. "Analysis of a Building Energy Efficiency Certification System in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-22, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ting-Jui Lu & Yi-Kai Juan, 2019. "Applying Kano Two-Dimensional Quality Model to Build the Performance Evaluation Indicators of Long-Life High-Quality Condominiums," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-12, July.
    2. Igor Krejčí & Pavel Moulis & Jana Pitrová & Ivana Tichá & Ladislav Pilař & Jan Rydval, 2019. "Traps and Opportunities of Czech Small-Scale Beef Cattle Farming," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-26, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ken’ichi Matsumoto & Yuki Yamamoto & Nao Ohya, 2018. "Effect of Subsidies and Tax Deductions on Promoting the Construction of Long-Life Quality Houses in Japan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Mustaffa, Nur Kamaliah & Kudus, Sakhiah Abdul, 2022. "Challenges and way forward towards best practices of energy efficient building in Malaysia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    3. Hye Gi Kim & Sun Sook Kim, 2020. "Occupants’ Awareness of and Satisfaction with Green Building Technologies in a Certified Office Building," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, March.
    4. Kim, Min-Hwi & Kim, Deukwon & Heo, Jaehyeok & Lee, Dong-Won, 2020. "Energy performance investigation of net plus energy town: Energy balance of the Jincheon Eco-Friendly energy town," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 1784-1800.
    5. Fabrizio M. Amoruso & Min-Hee Sonn & Soyeon Chu & Thorsten Schuetze, 2021. "Sustainable Building Legislation and Incentives in Korea: A Case-Study-Based Comparison of Building New and Renovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-41, April.
    6. Lee, Junghun & Yoo, Seunghwan & Kim, Jonghun & Song, Doosam & Jeong, Hakgeun, 2018. "Improvements to the customer baseline load (CBL) using standard energy consumption considering energy efficiency and demand response," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 1052-1063.
    7. Lee, Junsoo & Kim, Tae Wan & Koo, Choongwan, 2022. "A novel process model for developing a scalable room-level energy benchmark using real-time bigdata: Focused on identifying representative energy usage patterns," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    8. Fabrizio M. Amoruso & Udo Dietrich & Thorsten Schuetze, 2019. "Indoor Thermal Comfort Improvement through the Integrated BIM-Parametric Workflow-Based Sustainable Renovation of an Exemplary Apartment in Seoul, Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-31, July.
    9. Matheus Koengkan & José Alberto Fuinhas & Magdalena Radulescu & Emad Kazemzadeh & Nooshin Karimi Alavijeh & Renato Santiago & Mônica Teixeira, 2023. "Assessing the Role of Financial Incentives in Promoting Eco-Friendly Houses in the Lisbon Metropolitan Area—Portugal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-20, February.
    10. Hyemi Kim & Wonjun Park, 2018. "A Study of the Energy Efficiency Management in Green Standard for Energy and Environmental Design (G-SEED)-Certified Apartments in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, September.
    11. Min-Suk Jo & Jang-Hoon Shin & Won-Jun Kim & Jae-Weon Jeong, 2017. "Energy-Saving Benefits of Adiabatic Humidification in the Air Conditioning Systems of Semiconductor Cleanrooms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-23, November.
    12. Villca-Pozo, Milenka & Gonzales-Bustos, Juan Pablo, 2019. "Tax incentives to modernize the energy efficiency of the housing in Spain," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 530-538.
    13. Yeweon Kim & Ki-Hyung Yu, 2018. "Study on Policy Marking of Passive Level Insulation Standards for Non-Residential Buildings in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, July.
    14. Hye Gi Kim & Hyun Jun Kim & Chae Hwan Jeon & Myeong Won Chae & Young Hum Cho & Sun Sook Kim, 2020. "Analysis of Energy Saving Effect and Cost Efficiency of ECMs to Upgrade the Building Energy Code," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-22, September.
    15. Matthew Cohen, 2017. "A Systematic Review of Urban Sustainability Assessment Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-16, November.
    16. Stead, Martine & McDermott, Laura & MacKintosh, Anne Marie & Adamson, Ashley, 2011. "Why healthy eating is bad for young people's health: Identity, belonging and food," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(7), pages 1131-1139, April.
    17. Matheus Koengkan & Nuno Silva & José Alberto Fuinhas, 2023. "Assessing Energy Performance Certificates for Buildings: A Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) of Portuguese Municipalities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-30, April.
    18. Hussein Haruna & Xiao Hu & Samuel Kai Wah Chu & Robin R. Mellecker & Goodluck Gabriel & Patrick Siril Ndekao, 2018. "Improving Sexual Health Education Programs for Adolescent Students through Game-Based Learning and Gamification," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-26, September.
    19. Fabrizio Maria Amoruso & Udo Dietrich & Thorsten Schuetze, 2018. "Development of a Building Information Modeling-Parametric Workflow Based Renovation Strategy for an Exemplary Apartment Building in Seoul, Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-30, November.
    20. Egner, Lars Even & Klöckner, Christian A., 2021. "Temporal spillover of private housing energy retrofitting: Distribution of home energy retrofits and implications for subsidy policies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:10:p:1794-:d:114009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.