IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i6p2088-d153350.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consumer Intervention Mapping—A Tool for Designing Future Product Strategies within Circular Product Service Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Matt Sinclair

    (Loughborough Design School, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK)

  • Leila Sheldrick

    (Dyson School of Design Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK)

  • Mariale Moreno

    (Centre for Competitive Creative Design (C4D), Cranfield University, Bedford MK43 0AL, UK)

  • Emma Dewberry

    (School of Engineering and Innovation, Open University, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK)

Abstract

Re-distributed manufacturing presents a number of opportunities and challenges for New Product Development in a future Circular Economy. It has been argued that small-scale, flexible and localised production systems will reduce resource consumption, lower transport emissions and extend product lifetimes. At the same time smart products within the Internet of Things will gather and report data on user behaviour and product status. Many sustainable design tools have previously been developed but few are able to imagine and develop visions of how future sustainable product service systems might be manifested. This paper introduces the concept of Consumer Intervention Mapping as a tool for creating future product strategies. The tool visualises the points within a product’s lifecycle where stakeholders are able to intervene in the product’s expected journey. This perspective enables the rapid construction of scenarios that explore and describe future circular product service systems. Validation of the tool in three workshops is described and the outcomes are presented. Consumer Intervention Mapping is successful in creating scenarios that describe existing product service systems and new product concepts adapted to a Circular Economy paradigm. Further work is required to refine the tool’s performance in more focused and reflective design exercises.

Suggested Citation

  • Matt Sinclair & Leila Sheldrick & Mariale Moreno & Emma Dewberry, 2018. "Consumer Intervention Mapping—A Tool for Designing Future Product Strategies within Circular Product Service Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-21, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:6:p:2088-:d:153350
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/6/2088/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/6/2088/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marc A. Rosen & Hossam A. Kishawy, 2012. "Sustainable Manufacturing and Design: Concepts, Practices and Needs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Felipe Cerdas & Max Juraschek & Sebastian Thiede & Christoph Herrmann, 2017. "Life Cycle Assessment of 3D Printed Products in a Distributed Manufacturing System," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 21(S1), pages 80-93, November.
    3. Stein, Alisha & Ramaseshan, B., 2016. "Towards the identification of customer experience touch point elements," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 8-19.
    4. Philippe Durance & Michel Godet, 2010. "Scenario building: Uses and abuses," Post-Print hal-02864615, HAL.
    5. Marcel C. Hollander & Conny A. Bakker & Erik Jan Hultink, 2017. "Product Design in a Circular Economy: Development of a Typology of Key Concepts and Terms," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 21(3), pages 517-525, June.
    6. Ramirez, Rafael & Wilkinson, Angela, 2014. "Rethinking the 2×2 scenario method: Grid or frames?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 254-264.
    7. Karel Kellens & Martin Baumers & Timothy G. Gutowski & William Flanagan & Reid Lifset & Joost R. Duflou, 2017. "Environmental Dimensions of Additive Manufacturing: Mapping Application Domains and Their Environmental Implications," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 21(S1), pages 49-68, November.
    8. Mariale Moreno & Carolina De los Rios & Zoe Rowe & Fiona Charnley, 2016. "A Conceptual Framework for Circular Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-15, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rocío González-Sánchez & Davide Settembre-Blundo & Anna Maria Ferrari & Fernando E. García-Muiña, 2020. "Main Dimensions in the Building of the Circular Supply Chain: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-25, March.
    2. Louise Møller Haase & Line Sand Lythje, 2022. "User Strategies for Prolonging Product Lifetimes: A New Starting Point for Circular Conceptual Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Ruth Mugge, 2018. "Product Design and Consumer Behaviour in a Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-4, October.
    4. Winston Jerónimo Silvestre & Ana Fonseca & Sandra Naomi Morioka, 2022. "Strategic sustainability integration: Merging management tools to support business model decisions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2052-2067, July.
    5. Ricardo J Hernandez, 2019. "Sustainable Product-Service Systems and Circular Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-11, September.
    6. Chauhan, Chetna & Parida, Vinit & Dhir, Amandeep, 2022. "Linking circular economy and digitalisation technologies: A systematic literature review of past achievements and future promises," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    7. Rodrigues Dias, Veruska Mazza & Jugend, Daniel & de Camargo Fiorini, Paula & Razzino, Carlos do Amaral & Paula Pinheiro, Marco Antonio, 2022. "Possibilities for applying the circular economy in the aerospace industry: Practices, opportunities and challenges," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    8. Oskar Rexfelt & Anneli Selvefors, 2021. "The Use2Use Design Toolkit—Tools for User-Centred Circular Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, May.
    9. Francesco Galati & Barbara Bigliardi & Alberto Petroni & Claudia Pinna & Monica Rossi & Sergio Terzi, 2019. "Sustainable Product Lifecycle: The Role of ICT," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-4, December.
    10. Peter Byrial Jensen & Louise Møller Haase & Linda Nhu Laursen, 2021. "A Practical Approach to Companies’ Transformation toward Product Longevity: A Best-Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-16, December.
    11. Nancy Bocken & Lars Strupeit & Katherine Whalen & Julia Nußholz, 2019. "A Review and Evaluation of Circular Business Model Innovation Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-25, April.
    12. Jan Konietzko & Nancy Bocken & Erik Jan Hultink, 2020. "A Tool to Analyze, Ideate and Develop Circular Innovation Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-39, January.
    13. Rita Henriques & Filipa Figueiredo & João Nunes, 2023. "Product-Services for a Resource-Efficient and Circular Economy: An Updated Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-24, August.
    14. Aine Petrulaityte & Fabrizio Ceschin & Eujin Pei & David Harrison, 2020. "Applying Distributed Manufacturing to Product-Service System Design: A Set of Near-Future Scenarios and a Design Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-39, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sofie Hagejärd & Anita Ollár & Paula Femenías & Ulrike Rahe, 2020. "Designing for Circularity—Addressing Product Design, Consumption Practices and Resource Flows in Domestic Kitchens," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Alessio Franconi & Fabrizio Ceschin & David Peck, 2022. "Structuring Circular Objectives and Design Strategies for the Circular Economy: A Multi-Hierarchical Theoretical Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-26, July.
    3. Daniel Jugend & Hugo Henrique dos Santos & Susana Garrido & Regiane Máximo Siqueira & Jaime A. Mesa, 2024. "Circular product design challenges: An exploratory study on critical barriers," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 4825-4842, July.
    4. Fabio Boschetti & Elizabeth A. Fulton & Nicola J. Grigg, 2014. "Citizens’ Views of Australia’s Future to 2050," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-26, December.
    5. Daniela M. Salvioni & Alex Almici, 2020. "Transitioning Toward a Circular Economy: The Impact of Stakeholder Engagement on Sustainability Culture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-30, October.
    6. Johannes Matschewsky, 2019. "Unintended Circularity?—Assessing a Product-Service System for its Potential Contribution to a Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-27, May.
    7. Friedrich A. Halstenberg & Kai Lindow & Rainer Stark, 2019. "Leveraging Circular Economy through a Methodology for Smart Service Systems Engineering," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-36, June.
    8. Emilia Ingemarsdotter & Ella Jamsin & Gerd Kortuem & Ruud Balkenende, 2019. "Circular Strategies Enabled by the Internet of Things—A Framework and Analysis of Current Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-37, October.
    9. Wang, Jason X. & Burke, Haydn & Zhang, Abraham, 2022. "Overcoming barriers to circular product design," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    10. Thomas Nyström & Katherine A. Whalen & Derek Diener & Marcel den Hollander & Robert H. W. Boyer, 2021. "Managing Circular Business Model Uncertainties with Future Adaptive Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-18, September.
    11. Alfonso Aranda-Usón & Pilar Portillo-Tarragona & Luz María Marín-Vinuesa & Sabina Scarpellini, 2019. "Financial Resources for the Circular Economy: A Perspective from Businesses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-23, February.
    12. Bourgeois, Robin & Penunia, Esther & Bisht, Sonali & Boruk, Don, 2017. "Foresight for all: Co-elaborative scenario building and empowerment," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 178-188.
    13. Aurelija Burinskienė & Olga Lingaitienė & Artūras Jakubavičius, 2022. "Core Elements Affecting the Circularity of Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-21, July.
    14. Siri Willskytt, 2021. "Design of Consumables in a Resource-Efficient Economy—A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-26, January.
    15. Muna Adilah & Hsin Rau & Katrina Mae Procopio, 2023. "Using an Axiomatic Design Approach to Develop a Product Innovation Process with Circular and Smart Design Aspects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-24, January.
    16. Ana E. Oros Daraban & Catalin S. Negrea & Flavia G. P. Artimon & Dorin Angelescu & Gheorghe Popan & Silviu I. Gheorghe & Marian Gheorghe, 2019. "A Deep Look at Metal Additive Manufacturing Recycling and Use Tools for Sustainability Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-20, October.
    17. Siri Willskytt & Sergio A. Brambila-Macias, 2020. "Design Guidelines Developed from Environmental Assessments: A Design Tool for Resource-Efficient Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-38, June.
    18. Matthew J. Spaniol & Nicholas J. Rowland, 2019. "Defining scenario," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(1), March.
    19. Naiara Uriarte-Gallastegi & Beñat Landeta-Manzano & German Arana-Landín & Iker Laskurain-Iturbe, 2022. "How Do Technologies Based on Cyber–Physical Systems Affect the Environmental Performance of Products? A Comparative Study of Manufacturers’ and Customers’ Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-26, October.
    20. Damien Evrard & Helmi Ben Rejeb & Peggy Zwolinski & Daniel Brissaud, 2021. "Designing Immortal Products: A Lifecycle Scenario-Based Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-13, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:6:p:2088-:d:153350. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.