IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i6p2076-d153235.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the Enhancement Effects of Using Ecological Principles in Managing the Lifecycle of Industrial Land

Author

Listed:
  • Libin Guo

    (Science and Technology Department, Chongqing University of Education, Chongqing 400065, China)

  • Lina Han

    (School of Construction Management and Real Estate, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China)

  • Huikun Hong

    (Chongqing Key Laboratory of Karst Environment, School of Geographical Sciences in Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China)

  • Tao Zhou

    (School of Construction Management and Real Estate, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China)

Abstract

This paper introduces a performance level concept for industrial land use. The performance level concept uses ecological principles to evaluate index systems for industrial land. We used this concept to integrate local economics, land use, development potential, environmental health and ecosystem management with innovation, harmony, floral preservation, and shared land use. The concept helps promote the efficient use of industrial land and the sustainable use of land resources. We used the chemical medicine manufacturing industry in Chongqing Changshou Economic and Technological Development Zone as a case study. We selected eight companies for analysis and calculated an industrial land performance level for each company. We created three industrial land performance levels: growth potential type, positive development type, and inefficient recession type. To determine economic development and land sustainability, we applied administrative, economic, legal and technical measures to evaluate the entire lifecycle of industrial land. This lifecycle included preliminary project audit access, mid-period dynamic supervision and post land exit management. We conclude by proposing measures to mitigate environmental harm occurring from the intensive use of land for industrial use.

Suggested Citation

  • Libin Guo & Lina Han & Huikun Hong & Tao Zhou, 2018. "Research on the Enhancement Effects of Using Ecological Principles in Managing the Lifecycle of Industrial Land," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:6:p:2076-:d:153235
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/6/2076/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/6/2076/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xie, Hualin & Chen, Qianru & Lu, Fucai & Wu, Qing & Wang, Wei, 2018. "Spatial-temporal disparities, saving potential and influential factors of industrial land use efficiency: A case study in urban agglomeration in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 518-529.
    2. Filipe Batista e Silva & Eric Koomen & Vasco Diogo & Carlo Lavalle, 2014. "Estimating Demand for Industrial and Commercial Land Use Given Economic Forecasts," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-14, March.
    3. Zhang, Ning & Wu, Tao & Wang, Bing & Dong, Liang & Ren, Jingzheng, 2016. "Sustainable water resource and endogenous economic growth," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 237-244.
    4. Erik Louw, 2000. "The production of business sites in the Netherlands," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 91(1), pages 85-91, February.
    5. Erik Louw & Erwin van der Krabben & Hans van Amsterdam, 2012. "The Spatial Productivity of Industrial Land," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(1), pages 137-147, August.
    6. Xie, Hualin & Wang, Wei & Yang, Zihui & Choi, Yongrok, 2016. "Measuring the sustainable performance of industrial land utilization in major industrial zones of China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 207-219.
    7. Paul D. Jensen & Lauren Basson & Matthew Leach, 2011. "Reinterpreting Industrial Ecology," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 15(5), pages 680-692, October.
    8. Pascoe, Sean & Tingley, Diana, 2006. "Economic capacity estimation in fisheries: A non-parametric ray approach," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 124-138, May.
    9. McGrath, Daniel T., 2000. "Urban Industrial Land Redevelopment and Contamination Risk," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 414-442, May.
    10. Thomas W. Lester & Nikhil Kaza & Sarah Kirk, 2013. "Making Room for Manufacturing: Understanding Industrial Land Conversion in Cities," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 79(4), pages 295-313, October.
    11. Friso Vor & Henri Groot, 2010. "Agglomeration externalities and localized employment growth: the performance of industrial sites in Amsterdam," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 44(3), pages 409-431, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Congguo Zhang & Di Yao & Yanlin Zhen & Weiwei Li & Kerun Li, 2022. "Mismatched Relationship between Urban Industrial Land Consumption and Growth of Manufacturing: Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-35, August.
    2. Eda Ustaoglu & Filipe Batista e Silva & Carlo Lavalle, 2020. "Quantifying and modelling industrial and commercial land-use demand in France," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 519-549, January.
    3. Shu, Hui & Xiong, Ping-ping, 2019. "Reallocation planning of urban industrial land for structure optimization and emission reduction: A practical analysis of urban agglomeration in China’s Yangtze River Delta," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 604-623.
    4. Zhiheng Yang & Shaoxing Li & Dongqi Sun & Chenxi Li & Jiahui Wu, 2022. "Intensive Evaluation and High-Quality Redevelopment of Enterprise Land Use: A Case Study in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, March.
    5. Chen, Wei & Su, Zhi & Wang, Yanan & Wang, Qian & Zhao, Guoli, 2022. "Do the rank difference of industrial development zones affect land use efficiency? A regional analysis in China," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    6. Yuting, Yang & Guanghui, Jiang & Qiuyue, Zheng & Dingyang, Zhou & Yuling, Li, 2019. "Does the land use structure change conform to the evolution law of industrial structure? An empirical study of Anhui Province, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 657-667.
    7. Jeffrey Zabel, 2007. "The Impact of Imperfect Information on the Transactions of Contaminated Properties," NCEE Working Paper Series 200703, National Center for Environmental Economics, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, revised Jan 2007.
    8. Roberto Ercole & Robert O'neill, 2017. "The Influence of Agglomeration Externalities on Manufacturing Growth Within Indonesian Locations," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1), pages 91-126, March.
    9. Anna Alberini, 2007. "Determinants And Effects On Property Values Of Participation In Voluntary Cleanup Programs: The Case Of Colorado," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 25(3), pages 415-432, July.
    10. Pires, Jose Claudio Linhares & Cravo, Tulio & Lodato, Simon & Piza, Caio, 2013. "Industrial Clusters and Economic Performance in Brazil," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 4771, Inter-American Development Bank.
    11. Anna Alberini & Dennis Guignet, 2008. "Voluntary Cleanups and Redevelopment Potential: Lessons from Baltimore, Maryland," Working Papers 2008.87, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    12. Chenxi Li & Xing Gao & Bao-Jie He & Jingyao Wu & Kening Wu, 2019. "Coupling Coordination Relationships between Urban-industrial Land Use Efficiency and Accessibility of Highway Networks: Evidence from Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban Agglomeration, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-23, March.
    13. Ke Huang & Martin Dallimer & Lindsay C. Stringer & Anlu Zhang & Ting Zhang, 2021. "Does Economic Agglomeration Lead to Efficient Rural to Urban Land Conversion? An Examination of China’s Metropolitan Area Development Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    14. Oliviero A. Carboni, 2013. "A spatial analysis of R&D: the role of industry proximity," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(8), pages 820-839, November.
    15. Thomas de Graaff & Frank G. van Oort & Raymond J.G.M. Florax, 2012. "Regional Population–Employment Dynamics Across Different Sectors Of The Economy," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(1), pages 60-84, February.
    16. Zhao, Ke-Xin & Xu, Fei-Ran & Zhou, Yan & Ma, Tao, 2024. "The heterogeneous effects of non-hydro renewable energy and water resources on industrial development of the Yellow river and Yangtze river basins," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    17. Kajikawa, Yuya & Mejia, Cristian & Wu, Mengjia & Zhang, Yi, 2022. "Academic landscape of Technological Forecasting and Social Change through citation network and topic analyses," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    18. Joana Mendonça & Christoph Grimpe, 2016. "Skills and regional entrepreneurship capital formation: a comparison between Germany and Portugal," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 41(6), pages 1440-1456, December.
    19. Na Wang & Yongrok Choi, 2019. "Challenges for Sustainable Water Use in the Urban Industry of Korea Based on the Global Non-Radial Directional Distance Function Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-15, July.
    20. Dai, Bing & Gu, Xiaokun & Xie, Boming, 2020. "Policy Framework and Mechanism of Life Cycle Management of Industrial Land (LCMIL) in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:6:p:2076-:d:153235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.