IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i6p2019-d152577.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Theory of Reasoned Action as a Framework for Communicating Climate Risk: A Case Study of Schoolchildren in the Mekong Delta in Vietnam

Author

Listed:
  • Quynh Anh Nguyen

    (National Institute for Science and Technology Policy and Strategy Studies (NISTPASS), 38 Ngo Quyen, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam)

  • Luc Hens

    (Campus de Campolide, Universidade of Nova De Lisboa, 1099-085 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Charlotte MacAlister

    (International Development Research Centre (IDRC), 150 Kent Street, Ottawa, ON CA1P 0B2, Canada)

  • Lester Johnson

    (Department of Management and Marketing, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia)

  • Boripat Lebel

    (Unit for Social and Environmental Research (USER), School of Public Policy, Chiang Mai University, 239 Huay Kaew Road, Muang District, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand)

  • Sinh Bach Tan

    (National Institute for Science and Technology Policy and Strategy Studies (NISTPASS), 38 Ngo Quyen, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam)

  • Hung Manh Nguyen

    (Winrock International, 98 To Ngoc Van, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam)

  • The Ninh Nguyen

    (Faculty of Marketing, Thuongmai University, 79 Ho Tung Mau, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam)

  • Louis Lebel

    (Unit for Social and Environmental Research (USER), School of Public Policy, Chiang Mai University, 239 Huay Kaew Road, Muang District, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand)

Abstract

Communicating climate risks to vulnerable groups motivating them to take adaptive actions remains a significant challenge in many populations, especially to children. The theory of reasoned action (TRA) suggests that attitude and subjective norms are important for persuasive communication. This study assesses how to apply TRA, its constructs and other relevant factors to predict behavior intention and beliefs and to change behavior tendency. The randomized field experiment method was applied to explore the differences between pre- and post-communication treatments (2 × 2 design). Can Tho city, located in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam, was selected as the research context because of its vulnerability to climate change. The results show that, first, TRA was found to be a significant predictor model of children’s climate change behavior intentions. Second, attitude has a significant effect on the children’s intention to act while videos with subjective norm treatment had not. The treatment interaction of both constructs also had a significant effect. Third, TRA theory-based treatments are positively associated with changes in children’ salient beliefs on attitude and normative belief on social norm toward climate change. In addition, past practices, knowledge and gender are further factors that influence children’s behavior intentions. A theory-inspired design of communication strategy allows the prediction and influencing of intentions. This finding has strong implications for both research and development in Vietnam.

Suggested Citation

  • Quynh Anh Nguyen & Luc Hens & Charlotte MacAlister & Lester Johnson & Boripat Lebel & Sinh Bach Tan & Hung Manh Nguyen & The Ninh Nguyen & Louis Lebel, 2018. "Theory of Reasoned Action as a Framework for Communicating Climate Risk: A Case Study of Schoolchildren in the Mekong Delta in Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:6:p:2019-:d:152577
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/6/2019/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/6/2019/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Reny Nadlifatin & Shu-Chiang Lin & Yulia Puspa Rachmaniati & Satria Fadil Persada & Mohammad Razif, 2016. "A Pro-Environmental Reasoned Action Model for Measuring Citizens’ Intentions regarding Ecolabel Product Usage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-10, November.
    2. Helena Martins Gonçalves & Adriana Viegas, 2015. "Explaining consumer use of renewable energy: determinants and gender and age moderator effects," Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 198-215, June.
    3. The Ninh Nguyen & Hoang Viet Nguyen & Antonio Lobo & The Son Dao, 2017. "Encouraging Vietnamese Household Recycling Behavior: Insights and Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-15, January.
    4. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    5. Martin Fishbein, 2008. "A Reasoned Action Approach to Health Promotion," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 28(6), pages 834-844, November.
    6. Ching-Wei Ho & Yu-Bing Wang & Neil Y. Yen, 2015. "Does Environmental Sustainability Play a Role in the Adoption of Smart Card Technology at Universities in Taiwan: An Integration of TAM and TRA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-16, August.
    7. Jacques Du Toit & Claire Wagner & Lizelle Fletcher, 2017. "Socio-Spatial Factors Affecting Household Recycling in Townhouses in Pretoria, South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-14, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kaori Kitagawa, 2021. "Disaster risk reduction activities as learning," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 105(3), pages 3099-3118, February.
    2. Hoang Viet Nguyen & Thanh Tu Phan & Antonio Lobo, 2019. "Debunking the Myth of Foreign Direct Investment toward Long-Term Sustainability of a Developing Country: A Transaction Cost Analysis Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-26, August.
    3. Walter Leal Filho & Muniyandi Balasubramanian & Roberto Ariel Abeldaño Zuñiga & Javier Sierra, 2023. "The Effects of Climate Change on Children’s Education Attainment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-12, April.
    4. Nicholas Oguge & Francis Oremo & Salome Adhiambo, 2021. "Investigating the Knowledge and Attitudes towards Plastic Pollution among the Youth in Nairobi, Kenya," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-13, October.
    5. Thi Thu Hien Phan & Hiep Xuan Tran & Trung Thanh Le & Ninh Nguyen & Simon Pervan & Manh Dung Tran, 2020. "The Relationship between Sustainable Development Practices and Financial Performance: A Case Study of Textile Firms in Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-20, July.
    6. Suk Min Pang & Booi Chen Tan & Teck Chai Lau, 2021. "Antecedents of Consumers’ Purchase Intention towards Organic Food: Integration of Theory of Planned Behavior and Protection Motivation Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-18, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Costanza Nosi & Antonella D’Agostino & Margherita Pagliuca & Carlo Alberto Pratesi, 2017. "Securing Retirement at a Young Age. Exploring the Intention to Buy Longevity Annuities through an Extended Version of the Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-20, June.
    2. Paola Briganti & Concetta Metallo & Maria Margherita Pagliuca & Luisa Varriale, 2023. "Exploring Citizens’ Behavior to Promote Environmental Sustainability: The Role of Information Overload and Urban Sustainable Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, February.
    3. Joana dos Santos Gonçalves & Ricardo Mateus & José Dinis Silvestre & Ana R. Pereira Roders, 2021. "Beyond Good Intentions: The Role of the Building Passport for the Sustainable Conservation of Built Heritage to Behavioural Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-19, July.
    4. Liyuan Liu & Yen Hsu, 2022. "Motivating factors behind the public’s use of smart recycling systems: perceived playfulness and environmental concern," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-13, December.
    5. Ellen Fogarty & Beverley Clarke & Kirstin E. Ross, 2021. "Investigating Food Waste Recycling in Local Food Service Businesses: A Case Study from a Local Government Area in Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-12, December.
    6. Hong Thi Thu Nguyen & Rern-Jay Hung & Chun-Hung Lee & Hang Thi Thu Nguyen, 2018. "Determinants of Residents’ E-Waste Recycling Behavioral Intention: A Case Study from Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-24, December.
    7. Yam B. Limbu & Long Pham & Thuy Thi Thu Nguyen, 2022. "Predictors of Green Cosmetics Purchase Intentions among Young Female Consumers in Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, October.
    8. Gladman Thondhlana & Thina N. Hlatshwayo, 2018. "Pro-Environmental Behaviour in Student Residences at Rhodes University, South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-19, August.
    9. Samal Kaliyeva & Francisco Jose Areal & Yiorgos Gadanakis, 2020. "Attitudes of Kazakh Rural Households towards Joining and Creating Cooperatives," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, November.
    10. Taso, Yu-Chung & Ho, Chien-Wei & Chen, Ruey-Shii, 2020. "The impact of problem awareness and biospheric values on the intention to use a smart meter," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    11. Wei-Ta Fang & Mei-Hsuan Huang & Bai-You Cheng & Rong-Jeo Chiu & Yi-Te Chiang & Chun-Wei Hsu & Eric Ng, 2021. "Applying a Comprehensive Action Determination Model to Examine the Recycling Behavior of Taipei City Residents," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-18, January.
    12. Adina-Iuliana Jigani & Camelia Delcea & Corina Ioanăș, 2020. "Consumers’ Behavior in Selective Waste Collection: A Case Study Regarding the Determinants from Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-35, August.
    13. Featherman, Mauricio & Jia, Shizhen (Jasper) & Califf, Christopher B. & Hajli, Nick, 2021. "The impact of new technologies on consumers beliefs: Reducing the perceived risks of electric vehicle adoption," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    14. Murat Okumah & Julia Martin-Ortega & Paula Novo & Pippa J. Chapman, 2020. "Revisiting the Determinants of Pro-Environmental Behaviour to Inform Land Management Policy: A Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Model Application," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-33, April.
    15. Mohammad Alipour & Rodney A. Stewart & Oz Sahin, 2021. "Beyond the Diffusion of Residential Solar Photovoltaic Systems at Scale: Allegorising the Battery Energy Storage Adoption Behaviour," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-12, August.
    16. Emrullah Erul & Kyle Maurice Woosnam & Tara J. Denley, 2022. "Modelling Residents’ Perspectives of Tourism Opposition in US Counties with the Highest Historical Numbers of Reported COVID-19 Cases," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-16, December.
    17. Ismi Rajiani & Sebastian Kot, 2018. "The Prospective Consumers of the Indonesian Green Aviation Initiative for Sustainable Development in Air Transportation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, May.
    18. Diana Puspita Sari & Nur Aini Masruroh & Anna Maria Sri Asih, 2021. "Consumer Intention to Participate in E-Waste Collection Programs: A Study of Smartphone Waste in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-28, March.
    19. Jacky Chin & Bernard C. Jiang & Ilma Mufidah & Satria Fadil Persada & Bustanul Arifin Noer, 2018. "The Investigation of Consumers’ Behavior Intention in Using Green Skincare Products: A Pro-Environmental Behavior Model Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, October.
    20. Andriani Kusumawati & Sari Listyorini & Suharyono & Edy Yulianto, 2020. "The Role of Religiosity on Fashion Store Patronage Intention of Muslim Consumers in Indonesia," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:6:p:2019-:d:152577. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.