IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i5p1423-d144510.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the Consumers’ Behavior Intention in Using Green Ecolabel Product through Pro-Environmental Planned Behavior Model in Developing and Developed Regions: Lessons Learned from Taiwan and Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Ilma Mufidah

    (Department of Industrial Management, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, 43, Keelung Rd, Da’an Dist, Taipei 106, Taiwan
    Department of Industrial Engineering, Telkom University, Bandung 40257, Indonesia)

  • Bernard C. Jiang

    (Department of Industrial Management, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, 43, Keelung Rd, Da’an Dist, Taipei 106, Taiwan)

  • Shu-Chiang Lin

    (Department of Industrial Management, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, 43, Keelung Rd, Da’an Dist, Taipei 106, Taiwan)

  • Jacky Chin

    (Department of Industrial Management, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, 43, Keelung Rd, Da’an Dist, Taipei 106, Taiwan
    Department of Mechanical Engineering, Atma Jaya Catholic University, Jakarta 12930, Indonesia)

  • Yulia Puspa Rachmaniati

    (Department of Industrial Management, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, 43, Keelung Rd, Da’an Dist, Taipei 106, Taiwan)

  • Satria Fadil Persada

    (Department of Business Management, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember (ITS), Surabaya 60111, Indonesia)

Abstract

An ecolabel product is an environmentally friendly substance that can be selected to maintain environmental sustainability. Both developed and developing regions are promoting the use of green products. The current study aimed to know the behavior intention on ecolabel product usage from citizens in developing and developed regions. The extended Theory of Planned Behavior, known as Pro-Environmental Planned Behavior Model (PEPB), was used as the assessment model. Two questionnaire surveys were conducted to extract the necessary information for analyzing user’s behavior intention in two different regions. Taiwan and Indonesia were selected as case studies of developed and developing regions, respectively. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was used to analyze the proposed model and the result reveals that the model explains 49% of behavior intention to use ecolabel product in Taiwan’s case and 72% in Indonesia’s case. The findings revealed that attitude (AT) is the key factor to determine the behavioral intention (BI) in both Taiwan and Indonesia. Several practical recommendations based on the finding can be considered as input for the governments and related agencies to persuade manufacturing companies to produce more ecolabel products. Increased citizens’ intention to use ecolabel products help the company to reach broader target market and provide incentives to manufacturing companies to produce more environmentally friendly products.

Suggested Citation

  • Ilma Mufidah & Bernard C. Jiang & Shu-Chiang Lin & Jacky Chin & Yulia Puspa Rachmaniati & Satria Fadil Persada, 2018. "Understanding the Consumers’ Behavior Intention in Using Green Ecolabel Product through Pro-Environmental Planned Behavior Model in Developing and Developed Regions: Lessons Learned from Taiwan and In," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-15, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:5:p:1423-:d:144510
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/5/1423/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/5/1423/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Reny Nadlifatin & Shu-Chiang Lin & Yulia Puspa Rachmaniati & Satria Fadil Persada & Mohammad Razif, 2016. "A Pro-Environmental Reasoned Action Model for Measuring Citizens’ Intentions regarding Ecolabel Product Usage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-10, November.
    2. Bove, Liliana L. & Pervan, Simon J. & Beatty, Sharon E. & Shiu, Edward, 2009. "Service worker role in encouraging customer organizational citizenship behaviors," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(7), pages 698-705, July.
    3. Cherubini, Francesco & Ulgiati, Sergio, 2010. "Crop residues as raw materials for biorefinery systems - A LCA case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 47-57, January.
    4. Ek, Åsa & Runefors, Marcus & Borell, Jonas, 2014. "Relationships between safety culture aspects – A work process to enable interpretation," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 179-186.
    5. Lee Cronbach, 1951. "Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 16(3), pages 297-334, September.
    6. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    7. Shu-Chiang Lin & Reny Nadlifatin & Anis Rahmawati Amna & Satria Fadil Persada & Mohammad Razif, 2017. "Investigating Citizen Behavior Intention on Mandatory and Voluntary Pro-Environmental Programs through a Pro-Environmental Planned Behavior Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-15, July.
    8. Renée A. St-Pierre & Jeffrey L. Derevensky & Caroline E. Temcheff & Rina Gupta, 2015. "Adolescent gambling and problem gambling: examination of an extended theory of planned behaviour," International Gambling Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 506-525, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jacky Chin & Herlina & Shu-Chiang Lin & Satria Fadil Persada & Choesnul Jaqin & Ilma Mufidah, 2020. "Preventive maintenance model for heating ventilation air conditioning in pharmacy manufacturing sector," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 11(1), pages 45-53, February.
    2. Eelco Buunk & Edwin van der Werf, 2019. "Adopters versus Non-Adopters of the Green Key Ecolabel in the Dutch Accommodation Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-18, June.
    3. Hongfan Zhang & Qurat Ul Ainn & Iram Bashir & Junaid Ul Haq & Mark A. Bonn, 2022. "Does Greenwashing Influence the Green Product Experience in Emerging Hospitality Markets Post-COVID-19?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, September.
    4. Ma. Janice J. Gumasing & Alyssa Bayola & Sebastian Luis Bugayong & Keithzi Rhaz Cantona, 2023. "Determining the Factors Affecting Filipinos’ Acceptance of the Use of Renewable Energies: A Pro-Environmental Planned Behavior Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, May.
    5. Yu Chang & Tao Zhang, 2019. "The Effects of Product Consistency and Consumer Resistance to Innovation on Green Product Diffusion in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-14, May.
    6. Desy Safitri & Fahrurrozi Fahrurrozi & Nina Nurhasanah & Arita Marini & Oman Unju Subandi & Shafruddin Tadjuddin & Murti Kusuma Wirasti & Irah Kasirah, 2022. "Effect of Eco-label and Renewable Energy Projects Knowledge on Environmental Awareness for Elementary School Students," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(3), pages 216-226, May.
    7. Nabil Hasan Al-Kumaim & Muhammad Salman Shabbir & Salman Alfarisi & Siti Hasnah Hassan & Abdulsalam K. Alhazmi & Sanil S. Hishan & Samer Al-Shami & Nadhmi A. Gazem & Fathey Mohammed & Hussein Mohammed, 2021. "Fostering a Clean and Sustainable Environment through Green Product Purchasing Behavior: Insights from Malaysian Consumers’ Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-17, November.
    8. Abdullah Al Mamun & Kanniga Malar Mohan & Noorshella Che Nawi & Muhammad Mehedi Masud & Rajennd Muniady & Noor Raihani Zainol, 2020. "Environmentally Friendly Business Practices among Low-Income Households in Rural Peninsular Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    9. Patel, Jayesh D. & Trivedi, Rohit H. & Yagnik, Arpan, 2020. "Self-identity and internal environmental locus of control: Comparing their influences on green purchase intentions in high-context versus low-context cultures," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    10. Öykü Hazal Aral & Jordi López-Sintas, 2020. "A Comprehensive Model to Explain Europeans’ Environmental Behaviors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-27, May.
    11. Qing He & Haiyang Zhao & Lin Shen & Liuqun Dong & Ye Cheng & Ke Xu, 2019. "Factors Influencing Residents’ Intention toward Green Retrofitting of Existing Residential Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-23, August.
    12. Ardvin Kester S. Ong & Josephine D. German & Anak Agung Ngurah Perwira Redi & Lara Nicole Z. Cordova & Franscine Althea B. Longanilla & Neallo L. Caprecho & Rocksel Andry V. Javier, 2023. "Antecedents of Behavioral Intentions for Purchasing Hybrid Cars Using Sustainability Theory of Planned Behavior Integrated with UTAUT2," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-24, May.
    13. Jingyang Zhou & Yanjun Qin & Shaoze Fang, 2019. "Impacts of Consumers and Real Estate Enterprises on the Implementation of Prefabrication in Residential Buildings: The Moderating Role of Incentive Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-17, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jacky Chin & Bernard C. Jiang & Ilma Mufidah & Satria Fadil Persada & Bustanul Arifin Noer, 2018. "The Investigation of Consumers’ Behavior Intention in Using Green Skincare Products: A Pro-Environmental Behavior Model Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, October.
    2. Divine Ifransca Wijaya & Phimsupha Kokchang, 2023. "Factors Influencing Generation Z’s Pro-Environmental Behavior towards Indonesia’s Energy Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-19, September.
    3. Shu-Chiang Lin & Reny Nadlifatin & Anis Rahmawati Amna & Satria Fadil Persada & Mohammad Razif, 2017. "Investigating Citizen Behavior Intention on Mandatory and Voluntary Pro-Environmental Programs through a Pro-Environmental Planned Behavior Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-15, July.
    4. Ding, David Xin & Hu, Paul Jen-Hwa & Sheng, Olivia R. Liu, 2011. "e-SELFQUAL: A scale for measuring online self-service quality," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(5), pages 508-515, May.
    5. Mei-Fang Chen & Ching-Ti Pan & Ming-Chuan Pan, 2009. "The Joint Moderating Impact of Moral Intensity and Moral Judgment on Consumer’s Use Intention of Pirated Software," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 90(3), pages 361-373, December.
    6. Kim, Seheon & Rasouli, Soora, 2022. "The influence of latent lifestyle on acceptance of Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS): A hierarchical latent variable and latent class approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 304-319.
    7. Joanie Roussel-Ouellet & Dominique Beaulieu & Lydi-Anne Vézina-Im & Stéphane Turcotte & Valérie Labbé & Danielle Bouchard, 2022. "Psychosocial Correlates of Recreational Screen Time among Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-15, December.
    8. Farzana Sharmin & Mohammad Tipu Sultan & Alina Badulescu & Dorin Paul Bac & Benqian Li, 2020. "Millennial Tourists’ Environmentally Sustainable Behavior Towards a Natural Protected Area: An Integrative Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-24, October.
    9. Ya-Hui Want, 2014. "Does Online Trading Affect Investors' Trading Intention?," The International Journal of Business and Finance Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 8(5), pages 71-79.
    10. Jun Hwan Kim & Hyun Cheol Lee, 2019. "Understanding the Repurchase Intention of Premium Economy Passengers Using an Extended Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, June.
    11. Costanza Nosi & Antonella D’Agostino & Margherita Pagliuca & Carlo Alberto Pratesi, 2017. "Securing Retirement at a Young Age. Exploring the Intention to Buy Longevity Annuities through an Extended Version of the Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-20, June.
    12. Park, Seong-Hee & Mahony, Daniel F. & Kim, Yukyoum & Kim, Young Do, 2015. "Curiosity generating advertisements and their impact on sport consumer behavior," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 359-369.
    13. Xumin Zhang & Hayk Khachatryan, 2023. "Does the Perceived Effectiveness of Voluntary Conservation Programs Affect Household Adoption of Sustainable Landscaping Practices?," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, July.
    14. Franke, George R. & Sarstedt, Marko & Danks, Nicholas P., 2021. "Assessing measure congruence in nomological networks," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 318-334.
    15. Dionysis Skarmeas & Constantinos N. Leonidou & Charalampos Saridakis & Giuseppe Musarra, 2020. "Pathways to Civic Engagement with Big Social Issues: An Integrated Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 164(2), pages 261-285, June.
    16. Ricardo Figueiredo Belchior & Roisin Lyons, 2021. "Explaining entrepreneurial intentions, nascent entrepreneurial behavior and new business creation with social cognitive career theory – a 5-year longitudinal analysis," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1945-1972, December.
    17. Ernest Etim & Olawande Daramola, 2023. "Investigating the E-Readiness of Informal Sector Operators to Utilize Web Technology Portal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-28, February.
    18. Chen Wei, 2021. "The influence of Consumers’ Purchase intention on Smart Wearable Device: A study of Consumers in East China," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 5(8), pages 46-72.
    19. Xiaocheng Vicky Zhang & Suk Ha Grace Chan, 2021. "Do Knowledge and Experience Value Affect Green Tourism Activity Participation and Buying Decision? A Case Study of Natural Dyeing Experience in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, July.
    20. Mohammad Tipu Sultan & Farzana Sharmin & Alina Badulescu & Darie Gavrilut & Ke Xue, 2021. "Social Media-Based Content towards Image Formation: A New Approach to the Selection of Sustainable Destinations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-22, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:5:p:1423-:d:144510. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.