IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v130y2021icp318-334.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing measure congruence in nomological networks

Author

Listed:
  • Franke, George R.
  • Sarstedt, Marko
  • Danks, Nicholas P.

Abstract

Evaluations of convergent and discriminant validity are generally conducted by analyzing constructs in isolation or by comparing pairs of latent variables. These approaches ignore the broader nomological network that is intrinsic to a measure’s construct validity, and fail to test the implications of either perfect correlations (convergence) or imperfect correlations (divergence). This paper proposes congruence assessment as a useful approach to simultaneously examining the relationships between multiple latent variables within nomological networks. Two measures are congruent if they have proportionally equal correlations with other constructs. We present measures for quantifying congruence within nomological networks, discuss statistical tests of significance, and demonstrate their performance in simulation studies. We reanalyze three published studies to contrast findings from congruence assessment versus traditional criteria for convergent and discriminant validity. We also discuss methodological and theoretical implications of congruence assessment, and suggest future research directions for both covariance- and composite-based structural equation modeling.

Suggested Citation

  • Franke, George R. & Sarstedt, Marko & Danks, Nicholas P., 2021. "Assessing measure congruence in nomological networks," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 318-334.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:130:y:2021:i:c:p:318-334
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.03.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296321001569
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.03.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bove, Liliana L. & Pervan, Simon J. & Beatty, Sharon E. & Shiu, Edward, 2009. "Service worker role in encouraging customer organizational citizenship behaviors," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(7), pages 698-705, July.
    2. G. Tomas M. Hult & David J. Ketchen & Stanley F. Slater, 2005. "Market orientation and performance: an integration of disparate approaches," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(12), pages 1173-1181, December.
    3. Lee Cronbach, 1951. "Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 16(3), pages 297-334, September.
    4. Gyeongcheol Cho & Heungsun Hwang & Marko Sarstedt & Christian M. Ringle, 2020. "Cutoff criteria for overall model fit indexes in generalized structured component analysis," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(4), pages 189-202, December.
    5. Steenbergen, Marco R., 2000. "Item Similarity in Scale Analysis," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(3), pages 261-283, March.
    6. Heungsun Hwang & Yoshio Takane, 2004. "Generalized structured component analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 69(1), pages 81-99, March.
    7. Frederic Lord, 1957. "A significance test for the hypothesis that two variables measure the same trait except for errors of measurement," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 22(3), pages 207-220, September.
    8. Clay M. Voorhees & Michael K. Brady & Roger Calantone & Edward Ramirez, 2016. "Discriminant validity testing in marketing: an analysis, causes for concern, and proposed remedies," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 119-134, January.
    9. Farrell, Andrew M., 2010. "Insufficient discriminant validity: A comment on Bove, Pervan, Beatty, and Shiu (2009)," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 324-327, March.
    10. Rajdeep Grewal & Joseph A. Cote & Hans Baumgartner, 2004. "Multicollinearity and Measurement Error in Structural Equation Models: Implications for Theory Testing," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 519-529, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shela, V. & Danks, Nicholas P. & Ramayah, T. & Ahmad, Noor Hazlina, 2024. "An application of the COA Framework: Building a sound foundation for organizational resilience," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shiu, Edward & Pervan, Simon J. & Bove, Liliana L. & Beatty, Sharon E., 2011. "Reflections on discriminant validity: Reexamining the Bove et al. (2009) findings," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(5), pages 497-500, May.
    2. Clay M. Voorhees & Michael K. Brady & Roger Calantone & Edward Ramirez, 2016. "Discriminant validity testing in marketing: an analysis, causes for concern, and proposed remedies," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 119-134, January.
    3. Seiler, Volker & Fanenbruck, Katharina Maria, 2021. "Acceptance of digital investment solutions: The case of robo advisory in Germany," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    4. McDonald, Heath & Karg, Adam J. & Vocino, Andrea, 2013. "Measuring season ticket holder satisfaction: Rationale, scale development and longitudinal validation," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 41-53.
    5. Horstmann, Felix, 2017. "Measuring the shopper's attitude toward the point of sale display: Scale development and validation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 112-123.
    6. Hauck, Jana & Suess-Reyes, Julia & Beck, Susanne & Prügl, Reinhard & Frank, Hermann, 2016. "Measuring socioemotional wealth in family-owned and -managed firms: A validation and short form of the FIBER Scale," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 133-148.
    7. François Lenglet, 2018. "FNS or the Varseek-scale? Proposals for a valid operationalization of neophilia," Post-Print halshs-02402036, HAL.
    8. Bhattarai, Charan Raj & Kwong, Caleb C.Y. & Tasavori, Misagh, 2019. "Market orientation, market disruptiveness capability and social enterprise performance: An empirical study from the United Kingdom," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 47-60.
    9. Ryu, Do-Hyeon & Kim, Kwang-Jae, 2024. "The influence of information privacy concerns and perceived electricity usage habits on the usage intention of advanced metering infrastructure," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PA).
    10. Gyeongcheol Cho & Christopher Schlaegel & Heungsun Hwang & Younyoung Choi & Marko Sarstedt & Christian M. Ringle, 2022. "Integrated Generalized Structured Component Analysis: On the Use of Model Fit Criteria in International Management Research," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 62(4), pages 569-609, August.
    11. Gordon W. Cheung & Helena D. Cooper-Thomas & Rebecca S. Lau & Linda C. Wang, 2024. "Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity with structural equation modeling: A review and best-practice recommendations," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 745-783, June.
    12. Félix Cuneo & Jean-Philippe Antonietti & Christine Mohr, 2018. "Unkept promises of cognitive styles: A new look at old measurements," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-18, August.
    13. Yanhui Zhao & Roger J. Calantone & Clay M. Voorhees, 2018. "Identity change vs. strategy change: the effects of rebranding announcements on stock returns," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(5), pages 795-812, September.
    14. Paraskevas Kechagias & Efstathios Dimitriadis, 2019. "Citizens' Intent and Behavior Towards Recycling in the Municipality of Kavala," International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research (IJBESAR), International Hellenic University (IHU), Kavala Campus, Greece (formerly Eastern Macedonia and Thrace Institute of Technology - EMaTTech), vol. 12(3), pages 62-72, December.
    15. Won-Moo Hur & Tae-Won Moon & Hanna Kim, 2020. "When does customer CSR perception lead to customer extra-role behaviors? The roles of customer spirituality and emotional brand attachment," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(4), pages 421-437, July.
    16. Leroy Robinson, 2017. "Embracing online education: exploring options for success," Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 99-111, January.
    17. Dawei Lu & Yi Ding & Sobhan Asian & Sanjoy Kumar Paul, 2018. "From Supply Chain Integration to Operational Performance: The Moderating Effect of Market Uncertainty," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 19(1), pages 3-20, March.
    18. Mohammed Yousef Mai & Mahizer Hamzah, 2017. "Primary Science Teachers’ Perceptions of Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) In Malaysia," European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 4, ejser_v4_.
    19. Gregory-Siy Ching, 2021. "The Moderating Role of Personality in the Relationship between Internet Use and Study Abroad Difficulties," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-25, July.
    20. Hair, Joseph F. & Astrachan, Claudia Binz & Moisescu, Ovidiu I. & Radomir, Lăcrămioara & Sarstedt, Marko & Vaithilingam, Santha & Ringle, Christian M., 2021. "Executing and interpreting applications of PLS-SEM: Updates for family business researchers," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 12(3).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:130:y:2021:i:c:p:318-334. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.