IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i4p1079-d139606.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Minabe-Tanabe Ume System: Linkage of Landscape Units by Locals

Author

Listed:
  • Yuji Hara

    (Faculty of Systems Engineering, Wakayama University, Wakayama-city 640-8510, Japan)

  • Yuki Sampei

    (Faculty of Systems Engineering, Wakayama University, Wakayama-city 640-8510, Japan)

  • Hirotaka Tanaka

    (Sakai City Hall, Sakai-city 590-0078, Japan)

Abstract

This paper focuses on the Minabe-Tanabe Ume system, which was designated as a Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS) in December of 2015. Because landholdings reflect historical social connections among various landscape units, we quantitatively examined the landscape characteristics of the system by preparing digitized spatial data and performing geographic information system analysis. We also examined the consensus building process among different stakeholders toward GIAHS recognition, as well as the emergent local spatial structure of the stakeholder network through interviews with key stakeholders and participatory monitoring. Our spatial analysis of the landscape generally supported the traditional knowledge of the area as a watershed-based mosaic of coppice forests on ridges, Ume orchards on sloped areas, and villages with rice paddies and dry fields in the plains. Our stakeholder network visualization identified several key persons as important nodes that could connect different types of land use now and may have done so in the past. Moreover, because our GIAHS site has compact agglomerations of watersheds with ranges within a ~30-min drive, most stakeholders, who turned out to have graduated from the same local school, are able to maximize their social capital to reorganize the remaining nodes among different land uses, thereby contributing to the formation of the land-use system and its further promotion through dynamic conservation measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuji Hara & Yuki Sampei & Hirotaka Tanaka, 2018. "The Minabe-Tanabe Ume System: Linkage of Landscape Units by Locals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:4:p:1079-:d:139606
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/4/1079/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/4/1079/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shunsuke Managi & Yasutaka Yamamoto & Hiroyuki Iwamoto & Kiyotaka Masuda, 2008. "Valuing the influence of underlying attitudes and the demand for organic milk in Japan," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 39(3), pages 339-348, November.
    2. Shaohui Liu & Wenjun Jiao & Qingwen Min & Jianzhong Yin, 2017. "The Influences of Production Factors with Profit on Agricultural Heritage Systems: A Case Study of the Rice-Fish System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-10, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuji Hara & Shinji Oki & Yoshiyuki Uchiyama & Kyuichi Ito & Yuto Tani & Asako Naito & Yuki Sampei, 2021. "Plant Diversity in the Dynamic Mosaic Landscape of an Agricultural Heritage System: The Minabe-Tanabe Ume System," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kentaka Aruga, 2017. "Consumer responses to food produced near the Fukushima nuclear plant," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 19(4), pages 677-690, October.
    2. Akinwehinmi, Oluwagbenga & Ogundari, Kolawole & Amos, Taiwo, 2021. "Consumers' Food Control Risk Perception and Preference for Government-Controlled Safety Certification in Emerging Food Markets," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315312, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Hyo-Jin Kim & Su-Mi Han & Seung-Hoon Yoo, 2018. "Measuring the Economic Benefits of Industrial Natural Gas Use in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-10, June.
    4. Johanna Lena Dahlhausen & Cam Rungie & Jutta Roosen, 2018. "Value of labeling credence attributes—common structures and individual preferences," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 49(6), pages 741-751, November.
    5. Xingguo Gu & Qixian Lai & Moucheng Liu & Ziqun He & Qingyang Zhang & Qingwen Min, 2019. "Sustainability Assessment of a Qingyuan Mushroom Culture System Based on Emergy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-13, September.
    6. Xiang Wu & Bin Hu & Jie Xiong, 2020. "Understanding Heterogeneous Consumer Preferences in Chinese Milk Markets: A Latent Class Approach," Post-Print hal-02489646, HAL.
    7. Derstappen, Rebecca & Christoph-Schulz, Inken & Banse, Martin, 2022. "An empirical analysis of the export potential of pork produced under higher animal welfare standards," Thünen Working Paper 319352, Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (vTI), Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
    8. Taglioni, Chiara & Cavicchi, Alessio & Torquati, Biancamaria & Scarpa, Riccardo, 2011. "Influence of Brand Equity on Milk Choice: A Choice Experiment Survey," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 2(3), pages 1-21, December.
    9. Derstappen, Rebecca & Christoph-Schulz, Inken Birte & Banse, Martin, 2021. "An empirical analysis of the export potential of pork produced under higher animal welfare standards," Thünen Working Papers 184, Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute, Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
    10. Kiyotaka Masuda & Shohei Kushiro, 2018. "Influence of brand equity on the price premium for private labels in fresh produce: A contingent valuation survey," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(2), pages 338-350, March.
    11. Yanghao Wang & Metin Çakır, 2020. "Welfare impacts of new demand‐enhancing agricultural products: The case of Honeycrisp apples," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 51(3), pages 445-457, May.
    12. Oluwagbenga Akinwehinmi & Kolawole Ogundari & Taye Timothy Amos, 2022. "Consumers’ food control risk perception and preference for food safety certification in emerging food markets," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(3), pages 690-708, September.
    13. Min Cui & Jizhou Zhang & Xianli Xia, 2022. "The Relationship between Child Rearing Burden and Farmers’ Adoption of Climate Adaptive Technology: Taking Water-Saving Irrigation Technology as an Example," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-22, June.
    14. Kitano, Shinichi & Mitsunari, Yuka & Yoshino, Akira, 2022. "The impact of information asymmetry on animal welfare-friendly consumption: Evidence from milk market in Japan," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    15. Shaohui Liu & Qingwen Min & Wenjun Jiao & Chuanjiang Liu & Jianzhong Yin, 2018. "Integrated Emergy and Economic Evaluation of Huzhou Mulberry-Dyke and Fish-Pond Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-11, October.
    16. Yuan Yuan & Gangchun Xu & Nannan Shen & Zhijuan Nie & Hongxia Li & Lin Zhang & Yunchong Gong & Yanhui He & Xiaofei Ma & Hongyan Zhang & Jian Zhu & Jinrong Duan & Pao Xu, 2022. "Valuation of Ecosystem Services for the Sustainable Development of Hani Terraces: A Rice–Fish–Duck Integrated Farming Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-19, July.
    17. Schroeter, Christiane & Nicholson, Charles F. & Meloy, Margaret G., 2016. "Consumer Valuation of Organic and Conventional Milk: Does Shelf Life Matter?," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 47(3), pages 1-19, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:4:p:1079-:d:139606. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.