IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i2p455-d131092.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fostering Sustainable Transportation Operations through Corridor Management: A Simulation Gaming Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Shalini Kurapati

    (Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, Jaffalaan 5, 2628 BX Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Ioanna Kourounioti

    (Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, Jaffalaan 5, 2628 BX Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Heide Lukosch

    (Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, Jaffalaan 5, 2628 BX Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Lóránt Tavasszy

    (Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, Jaffalaan 5, 2628 BX Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Alexander Verbraeck

    (Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, Jaffalaan 5, 2628 BX Delft, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Synchromodality is described as a network of well-synchronised and interconnected transportation modes. One of the most important advantages of synchromodality is the development of a sustainable transportation system. Given the numerous stakeholders and network interdependencies within freight transport corridors, achieving efficient coordination and management is complex. In this paper, we regard information exchange as one of the main enablers of collaboration between the infrastructure managers. We developed a digital single-player simulation game called “Modal Manager” comprising logistic service providers and infrastructure managers. Each player takes over the role of an infrastructure manager who must use information provision as a tool to control flows in a network where various planned and unplanned disruptions occur. We include the game in a session where participants are able to interact with the game and with each other. The first gameplay session with Dutch experts revealed that infrastructure managers perceive synchromodality as a way to cope with disruptions more efficiently. On the other hand, the concept of synchromodal corridor management is ambiguous and various legal and governance barriers exist that hinder its implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Shalini Kurapati & Ioanna Kourounioti & Heide Lukosch & Lóránt Tavasszy & Alexander Verbraeck, 2018. "Fostering Sustainable Transportation Operations through Corridor Management: A Simulation Gaming Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-18, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:2:p:455-:d:131092
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/2/455/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/2/455/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Feo-Valero, María & García-Menéndez, Leandro & Sáez-Carramolino, Lorena & Furió-Pruñonosa, Salvador, 2011. "The importance of the inland leg of containerised maritime shipments: An analysis of modal choice determinants in Spain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(4), pages 446-460, July.
    2. Guido Perboli & Stefano Musso & Mariangela Rosano & Roberto Tadei & Moritz Godel, 2017. "Synchro-Modality and Slow Steaming: New Business Perspectives in Freight Transportation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-24, October.
    3. Feo, María & Espino, Raquel & García, Leandro, 2011. "An stated preference analysis of Spanish freight forwarders modal choice on the south-west Europe Motorway of the Sea," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 60-67, January.
    4. Corinne Mulley, 2017. "Mobility as a Services (MaaS) – does it have critical mass?," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(3), pages 247-251, May.
    5. Valerio Gatta & Edoardo Marcucci, 2016. "Stakeholder-specific data acquisition and urban freight policy evaluation: evidence, implications and new suggestions," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(5), pages 585-609, September.
    6. Geert Vissers & Gerton Heyne & Vincent Peters & Jac Guerts, 2001. "The Validity of Laboratory Research in Social and Behavioral Science," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 129-145, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anastasia Roukouni & Heide Lukosch & Alexander Verbraeck & Rob Zuidwijk, 2020. "Let the Game Begin: Enhancing Sustainable Collaboration among Actors in Innovation Ecosystems in a Playful Way," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Johannes Rentschler & Ralf Elbert & Felix Weber, 2022. "Promoting Sustainability through Synchromodal Transportation: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Fields of Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-22, October.
    3. Sakti, Sekar & Zhang, Lele & Thompson, Russell G., 2023. "Synchronization in synchromodality," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    4. Bryann Avendano-Uribe & Heide Lukosch & Mark Milke, 2022. "Playing With Uncertainty: Facilitating Community-Based Resilience Building," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 278-294.
    5. Helmer Paz-Orozco & Irineu de Brito Junior & Mario Chong & Yesid Anacona-Mopan & Jhon Alexander Segura Dorado & Mariana Moyano, 2023. "Earthquake Decision-Making Tool for Humanitarian Logistics Network: An Application in Popayan, Colombia," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-18, October.
    6. Giusti, Riccardo & Manerba, Daniele & Bruno, Giorgio & Tadei, Roberto, 2019. "Synchromodal logistics: An overview of critical success factors, enabling technologies, and open research issues," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 92-110.
    7. Maryam R. Nezami & Mark L. C. de Bruijne & Marcel J. C. M. Hertogh & Hans L. M. Bakker, 2022. "Collaboration and Data Sharing in Inter-Organizational Infrastructure Construction Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-19, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rodrigo J. Tapia & Gerard Jong & Ana M. Larranaga & Helena B. Bettella Cybis, 2021. "Exploring Multiple‐discreteness in Freight Transport. A Multiple Discrete Extreme Value Model Application for Grain Consolidators in Argentina," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 581-608, September.
    2. Flitsch, Verena & Brümmerstedt, Katrin, 2015. "Freight Transport Modelling of Container Hinterland Supply Chains," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Blecker, Thorsten & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Operational Excellence in Logistics and Supply Chains: Optimization Methods, Data-driven Approaches and Security Insights. Proceedings of the Hamburg , volume 22, pages 233-266, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    3. Bury Alan & Paraskevadakis Dimitrios & Ren Jun & Saeed Farhan, 2017. "A framework for use in modelling the modal choice decision making process in North West England’s Atlantic Gateway," Logistics, Supply Chain, Sustainability and Global Challenges, Sciendo, vol. 8(1), pages 19-30, May.
    4. Tapia, Rodrigo J. & de Jong, Gerard & Larranaga, Ana M. & Bettella Cybis, Helena B., 2020. "Application of MDCEV to infrastructure planning in regional freight transport," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 255-271.
    5. Zhang, Rong & Zhu, Lichao, 2019. "Threshold incorporating freight choice modeling for hinterland leg transportation chain of export containers," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 858-872.
    6. Cavallaro, Federico & Nocera, Silvio & Sommacal, Giulia, 2021. "Appropriateness of the “small-scale corridor terminals” scheme for rail-road combined transport: Evidence from the Brenner axis," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    7. Tapia, Rodrigo Javier & dos Santos Senna, Luiz Afonso & Larranaga, Ana Margarita & Cybis, Helena Beatriz Bettella, 2019. "Joint mode and port choice for soy production in Buenos Aires province, Argentina," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 100-118.
    8. Morales-Fusco, Pau & Grau, Marc & Saurí, Sergi, 2018. "Effects of RoPax shipping line strategies on freight price and transporter’s choice. Policy implications for promoting MoS," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 67-76.
    9. Fabio Antonialli & Bruna Habib Cavazza & Rodrigo Gandia & Isabelle Nicolaï & Arthur de Miranda Neto & Joel Sugano & André Luiz Zambalde, 2020. "Human or machine driving? Comparing autonomous with traditional vehicles value curves and motives to use a car," Post-Print halshs-03687616, HAL.
    10. Pangbourne, Kate & Mladenović, Miloš N. & Stead, Dominic & Milakis, Dimitris, 2020. "Questioning mobility as a service: Unanticipated implications for society and governance," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 35-49.
    11. Karst Geurs & Cathy Macharis, 2019. "The future of European communication and transportation research: a research agenda," REGION, European Regional Science Association, vol. 6, pages 1-21.
    12. Crainic, Teodor Gabriel & Perboli, Guido & Rosano, Mariangela, 2018. "Simulation of intermodal freight transportation systems: a taxonomy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(2), pages 401-418.
    13. Taiba Zahid & Fouzia Gillani & Usman Ghafoor & Muhammad Raheel Bhutta, 2022. "Synchromodal Transportation Analysis of the One-Belt-One-Road Initiative Based on a Bi-Objective Mathematical Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-14, March.
    14. Larranaga, Ana Margarita & Arellana, Julian & Senna, Luiz Afonso, 2017. "Encouraging intermodality: A stated preference analysis of freight mode choice in Rio Grande do Sul," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 202-211.
    15. Yun Hui Lin & Yuan Wang & Loo Hay Lee & Ek Peng Chew, 2021. "Robust facility location with structural complexity and demand uncertainty," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 485-507, June.
    16. Johannes Rentschler & Ralf Elbert & Felix Weber, 2022. "Promoting Sustainability through Synchromodal Transportation: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Fields of Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-22, October.
    17. Li, Zhaojin & Liu, Ya & Yang, Zhen, 2021. "An effective kernel search and dynamic programming hybrid heuristic for a multimodal transportation planning problem with order consolidation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    18. Holguín-Veras, José & Amaya Leal, Johanna & Seruya, Barbara B., 2017. "Urban freight policymaking: The role of qualitative and quantitative research," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 75-85.
    19. Breen, Benjamin & Vega, Amaya & Feo-Valero, Maria, 2015. "An empirical analysis of mode and route choice for international freight transport in Ireland," Working Papers 262587, National University of Ireland, Galway, Socio-Economic Marine Research Unit.
    20. Gohari, Adel & Ahmad, Anuar Bin & Balasbaneh, Ali Tighnavard & Gohari, Ali & Hasan, Razi & Sholagberu, Abdulkadir Taofeeq, 2022. "Significance of intermodal freight modal choice criteria: MCDM-based decision support models and SP-based modal shift policies," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 46-60.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:2:p:455-:d:131092. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.