IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i1p250-d127677.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Injuries of Repetitive Efforts in Workers from the Poultry Meat Industry: A Bibliometric Analysis of Literature

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandre Crespo Coelho S. Pinto

    (Doctoral Program in Production Engineering and Systems, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis 88040-900, Brazil
    Center of Health Sciences, Federal University of Pampa-UNIPAMPA, Uruguaiana 97501-970, Brazil)

  • Diego Augusto Santos Silva

    (Department of Physical Education, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis 88040-900, Brazil)

  • Leonardo Ensslin

    (Post-Graduate Program in Administration, University of Southern Santa Catarina, Florianopolis 88137-272, Brazil)

  • Pedro Ferreira Reis

    (Department of Physical Therapy, University Center of Foz do Iguaçu, Foz do Iguaçu 85863-720, Brazil)

  • José Mohamud Vilagra

    (Department of Physical Therapy, State University of West Paraná, Cascavel 85819-110, Brazil
    Department of Physical Therapy, University Center Assis Gurgacz, Cascavel 85806-095, Brazil)

  • Lizandra G. Lupi Vergara

    (Doctoral Program in Production Engineering and Systems, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis 88040-900, Brazil)

  • Antônio R. Pereira Moro

    (Doctoral Program in Production Engineering and Systems, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis 88040-900, Brazil
    Department of Physical Education, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis 88040-900, Brazil)

Abstract

Injuries of repetitive efforts constitute one of the prime causes of absenteeism in the workplace, bear a considerable cost for the public health system and can cast doubt on the sustainability of a company. The objective of this paper is to build, in the researchers, the needed knowledge to choose a set of relevant scientific articles about repetitive strain injuries in the poultry meat industry, aiming to identify characteristics in those scientific publications that have the potential to contribute to the topic of this paper. The research is characterized as exploratory-descriptive, and draws on primary and secondary data sources. The study involves the application of a method for the selection and analysis of the selected articles. To this end, the method utilized was the knowledge development process—constructivist (Proknow-C), as the theoretical intervention instrument. Within the process development, a portfolio of 16 articles aligned to the research and scientifically recognized with the main periodicals, papers, authors and keywords was obtained. The ProKnow-C process allowed us to identify opportunities in the literature about injuries in the poultry meat industry and showed opportunities for future research. This paper, under the constructivist perspective, presents a structured process to build, in the researcher, the necessary knowledge for the identification, selection and analysis of relevant scientific articles relating to research context and, for these articles, find prominences and opportunities for a research theme without similar publications.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandre Crespo Coelho S. Pinto & Diego Augusto Santos Silva & Leonardo Ensslin & Pedro Ferreira Reis & José Mohamud Vilagra & Lizandra G. Lupi Vergara & Antônio R. Pereira Moro, 2018. "Injuries of Repetitive Efforts in Workers from the Poultry Meat Industry: A Bibliometric Analysis of Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:1:p:250-:d:127677
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/1/250/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/1/250/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philippe Askenazy, 2001. "Innovative Workplace Practices and Occupational Injuries and Illnesses in the United States," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 22(4), pages 485-516, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luigi Aldieri & Concetto Paolo Vinci, 2019. "Firm Size and Sustainable Innovation: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-9, May.
    2. Askenazy, Philippe & Caroli, Eve, 2006. "Innovative Work Practices, Information Technologies and Working Conditions: Evidence for France," IZA Discussion Papers 2321, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Andrew E. Clark, 2005. "Your Money or Your Life: Changing Job Quality in OECD Countries," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 43(3), pages 377-400, September.
    4. Philippe Askenazy & Ève Caroli & Vincent Marcus, 2002. "New Organizational Practices and Working Conditions . Evidence from France in the 1990's," Recherches économiques de Louvain, De Boeck Université, vol. 68(1), pages 91-110.
    5. Bauer, Thomas K., 2004. "High Performance Workplace Practices and Job Satisfaction: Evidence from Europe," IZA Discussion Papers 1265, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    6. Aldieri, Luigi & Garofalo, Antonio & Vinci, Concetto Paolo, 2015. "R&D Spillovers and Employment: A Micro-econometric Analysis," MPRA Paper 67269, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Marine Coupaud, 2020. "The mediating role of working conditions in the analysis of the links between offshoring and health of European workers," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 40(2), pages 1522-1537.
    8. Bloom, Nicholas & Van Reenen, John, 2011. "Human Resource Management and Productivity," Handbook of Labor Economics, in: O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (ed.), Handbook of Labor Economics, edition 1, volume 4, chapter 19, pages 1697-1767, Elsevier.
    9. Raouf BOUCEKKINE & Patricia, CRIFO & Claudio, MATTALIA, 2007. "Technological Progress, Organizational Change and the Size of the Human Resources Departement," Discussion Papers (ECON - Département des Sciences Economiques) 2007047, Université catholique de Louvain, Département des Sciences Economiques.
    10. Nicholas Bloom & Raffaella Sadun & John Van Reenen, 2010. "Recent Advances in the Empirics of Organizational Economics," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 2(1), pages 105-137, September.
    11. Robert D. Mohr & Cindy Zoghi, 2006. "Is Job Enrichment Really Enriching?," Working Papers 389, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
    12. Naval Garg, 2018. "Isolationist versus Integrationist: An Indian Perspective on High-Performance Work Practices," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 7(3), pages 216-227, September.
    13. Rene Fahr, 2011. "Job Design and Job Satisfaction – Empirical Evidence for Germany?," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 22(1), pages 28-46.
    14. Petri Böckerman & Edvard Johansson & Antti Kauhanen, 2012. "Innovative work practices and sickness absence: what does a nationally representative employee survey tell?," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 21(3), pages 587-613, June.
    15. Filippo Pusterla, 2020. "The Complementary Effect of Organizational Practices and Workers’ Level of Education," KOF Working papers 20-478, KOF Swiss Economic Institute, ETH Zurich.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:1:p:250-:d:127677. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.