IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i11p4293-d184077.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

BIM-Based Incremental Cost Analysis Method of Prefabricated Buildings in China

Author

Listed:
  • Yuan Qi

    (School of Civil Engineering, North China University of Technology, Beijing 100043, China)

  • Siwei Chang

    (School of Civil Engineering, North China University of Technology, Beijing 100043, China)

  • Yingbo Ji

    (School of Civil Engineering, North China University of Technology, Beijing 100043, China)

  • Kai Qi

    (School of Civil Engineering, North China University of Technology, Beijing 100043, China)

Abstract

In order to achieve the sustainable growth of its urbanization and natural resources, China has been making great efforts to develop prefabricated construction technologies. However, the high incremental cost of prefabricated buildings (PRBs) is a fundamental obstacle to the latter. The current study mainly focuses on analyzing the incremental cost of the on-site construction stage. It is hard to comprehensively identify the incremental cost composition without considering the incremental cost caused by prefabricated components (PFCs) production. Moreover, the results of incremental cost calculation are not accurate enough by comparing the cost of two similar but different PRB and traditional buildings (TRB), and the case-based calculation results suffer from a lack of representation. To address these issues, we first establish a two-dimensional incremental cost index system from the dimension of cost items and prefabricated technologies to study the incremental cost composition of the whole construction stage. Additionally, based on China’s latest policies documents, the applicability of incremental cost composition items can also be improved. Then a building information modeling (BIM)-based calculation model is presented to avoid the calculation error caused by comparing the cost of two different PRBs and TRBs. To validate the proposed index system and calculation method, an actual prefabricated project in China is also conducted as a case study. The results suggest that: (1) Incremental cost is composed of band bearing and retaining walls and inner walls PFCs production, PFCs hoisting and grouting, post-pouring concrete, and full decoration. (2) The BIM-based incremental calculation result of a PRB case from Shanghai is within the range of the national average PRB incremental estimation results. The incremental cost composition items and BIM-based calculation approach can greatly help investors to identify the largest increase in cost and make effective cost optimization strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuan Qi & Siwei Chang & Yingbo Ji & Kai Qi, 2018. "BIM-Based Incremental Cost Analysis Method of Prefabricated Buildings in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-21, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:11:p:4293-:d:184077
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/11/4293/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/11/4293/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Westerweel, Bram & Basten, Rob J.I. & van Houtum, Geert-Jan, 2018. "Traditional or Additive Manufacturing? Assessing Component Design Options through Lifecycle Cost Analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(2), pages 570-585.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. López-Guerrero, Rafael E. & Vera, Sergio & Carpio, Manuel, 2022. "A quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the sustainability of industrialised building systems: A bibliographic review and analysis of case studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    2. Zezhou Wu & Changhong Chen & Yuzhu Cai & Chen Lu & Hao Wang & Tao Yu, 2019. "BIM-Based Visualization Research in the Construction Industry: A Network Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-13, September.
    3. Anita Naneva & Marcella Bonanomi & Alexander Hollberg & Guillaume Habert & Daniel Hall, 2020. "Integrated BIM-Based LCA for the Entire Building Process Using an Existing Structure for Cost Estimation in the Swiss Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, May.
    4. Clyde Zhengdao Li & Mingcong Hu & Bing Xiao & Zhe Chen & Vivian W. Y. Tam & Yiyu Zhao, 2021. "Mapping the Knowledge Domains of Emerging Advanced Technologies in the Management of Prefabricated Construction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-31, August.
    5. Yongsheng Jiang & Dong Zhao & Dedong Wang & Yudong Xing, 2019. "Sustainable Performance of Buildings through Modular Prefabrication in the Construction Phase: A Comparative Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-15, October.
    6. Yanqiu Cui & Simeng Li & Chunlu Liu & Ninghan Sun, 2020. "Creation and Diversified Applications of Plane Module Libraries for Prefabricated Houses Based on BIM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-17, January.
    7. Yasser Yahya Al-Ashmori & Idris Othman & Al-Hussein M. H. Al-Aidrous, 2022. "“Values, Challenges, and Critical Success Factors” of Building Information Modelling (BIM) in Malaysia: Experts Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Altekin, F. Tevhide & Bukchin, Yossi, 2022. "A multi-objective optimization approach for exploring the cost and makespan trade-off in additive manufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(1), pages 235-253.
    2. Marić, Josip & Opazo-Basáez, Marco & Vlačić, Božidar & Dabić, Marina, 2023. "Innovation management of three-dimensional printing (3DP) technology: Disclosing insights from existing literature and determining future research streams," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    3. Arbabian, Mohammad E. & Wagner, Michael R., 2020. "The impact of 3D printing on manufacturer–retailer supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(2), pages 538-552.
    4. N. Knofius & M. C. Heijden & A. Sleptchenko & W. H. M. Zijm, 2021. "Improving effectiveness of spare parts supply by additive manufacturing as dual sourcing option," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 43(1), pages 189-221, March.
    5. Bram Westerweel & Rob Basten & Jelmar den Boer & Geert‐Jan van Houtum, 2021. "Printing Spare Parts at Remote Locations: Fulfilling the Promise of Additive Manufacturing," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(6), pages 1615-1632, June.
    6. Li Chen & Yao Cui & Hau L. Lee, 2021. "Retailing with 3D Printing," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(7), pages 1986-2007, July.
    7. Rachel Lacroix & Anna Timonina-Farkas & Ralf W. Seifert, 2023. "Utilizing additive manufacturing and mass customization under capacity constraints," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 281-301, January.
    8. Lacroix, Rachel & Seifert, Ralf W. & Timonina-Farkas, Anna, 2021. "Benefiting from additive manufacturing for mass customization across the product life cycle," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 8(C).
    9. Jing-Sheng Song & Yue Zhang, 2020. "Stock or Print? Impact of 3-D Printing on Spare Parts Logistics," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(9), pages 3860-3878, September.
    10. Sun, Mingyao & Ng, Chi To & Yang, Liu & Zhang, Tianhua, 2024. "Optimal after-sales service offering strategy: Additive manufacturing, traditional manufacturing, or hybrid?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    11. Knofius, N. & van der Heijden, M.C. & Zijm, W.H.M., 2019. "Consolidating spare parts for asset maintenance with additive manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 269-280.
    12. Lingxiu Dong & Duo Shi & Fuqiang Zhang, 2022. "3D Printing and Product Assortment Strategy," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(8), pages 5724-5744, August.
    13. Nie, Jiajia & Xu, Xiaoxuan & Yue, Xiaohang & Guo, Qiang & Zhou, Yu, 2023. "Less is more: A strategic analysis of 3D printing with limited capacity," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    14. Tang, Christopher S. & Veelenturf, Lucas P., 2019. "The strategic role of logistics in the industry 4.0 era," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 1-11.
    15. Alma van Oudheusden & Julieta Bolaños Arriola & Jeremy Faludi & Bas Flipsen & Ruud Balkenende, 2023. "3D Printing for Repair: An Approach for Enhancing Repair," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-33, March.
    16. Mao, Zhaofang & Fu, Enyuan & Huang, Dian & Fang, Kan & Chen, Lin, 2024. "Combinatorial Benders decomposition for single machine scheduling in additive manufacturing with two-dimensional packing constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 317(3), pages 890-905.
    17. Sun, Luoyi & Hua, Guowei & Cheng, T.C.E. & Teunter, Ruud H. & Dong, Jingxin & Wang, Yixiao, 2023. "Purchase or rent? Optimal pricing for 3D printing capacity sharing platforms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(3), pages 1192-1205.
    18. Arbabian, Mohammad E., 2022. "Supply Chain Coordination via Additive Manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    19. Li, Wei & Sun, Hui & Tong, Meng & Mustafee, Navonil & Koh, Lenny, 2024. "Customizing customization in a 3D printing-enabled hybrid manufacturing supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    20. Sgarbossa, Fabio & Peron, Mirco & Lolli, Francesco & Balugani, Elia, 2021. "Conventional or additive manufacturing for spare parts management: An extensive comparison for Poisson demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:11:p:4293-:d:184077. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.