IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i6p5168-d1097322.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

3D Printing for Repair: An Approach for Enhancing Repair

Author

Listed:
  • Alma van Oudheusden

    (Department of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Julieta Bolaños Arriola

    (Department of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Jeremy Faludi

    (Department of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Bas Flipsen

    (Department of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Ruud Balkenende

    (Department of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands)

Abstract

The availability and storage of spare parts are the main barriers to product repair. One possibility would be to 3D print spare parts, which would also enable the repair of products not intended to be repaired. Besides manufacturers, 3D printing spare parts is an interesting option for self-repair by consumers. However, the digitisation of spare parts for 3D printing is a challenge. There is little guidance on how to make a 3D-printed version of the original part. This paper establishes a framework through a literature review and experimental study to describe how to use 3D printing to produce spare parts for repair. Additionally, qualitative data coding was used to find the influence of previous experience, process implementation, and part complexity on the overall success of the 3D printing for repair (3DPfR) process. Our study showed that the 3DPfR process can be described as an iterative design for an additive manufacturing process that is integrated into a repair process. Additionally, it was found that the incorrect implementation of process steps was the most important predictor of the repair result. The steps that were performed incorrectly the most were synthesising design concepts (64%) and validating print quality (also 64%).

Suggested Citation

  • Alma van Oudheusden & Julieta Bolaños Arriola & Jeremy Faludi & Bas Flipsen & Ruud Balkenende, 2023. "3D Printing for Repair: An Approach for Enhancing Repair," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-33, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5168-:d:1097322
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5168/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5168/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nazlı Terzioğlu & Renee Wever, 2021. "Integrating Repair into Product Design Education: Insights on Repair, Design and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-21, September.
    2. Attaran, Mohsen, 2017. "The rise of 3-D printing: The advantages of additive manufacturing over traditional manufacturing," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 60(5), pages 677-688.
    3. Chekurov, Sergei & Metsä-Kortelainen, Sini & Salmi, Mika & Roda, Irene & Jussila, Ari, 2018. "The perceived value of additively manufactured digital spare parts in industry: An empirical investigation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 87-97.
    4. Westerweel, Bram & Basten, Rob J.I. & van Houtum, Geert-Jan, 2018. "Traditional or Additive Manufacturing? Assessing Component Design Options through Lifecycle Cost Analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(2), pages 570-585.
    5. Jan Holmström & Timothy Gutowski, 2017. "Additive Manufacturing in Operations and Supply Chain Management: No Sustainability Benefit or Virtuous Knock-On Opportunities?," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 21(S1), pages 21-24, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matthias M. Meyer & Andreas H. Glas & Michael Eßig, 2021. "Systematic review of sourcing and 3D printing: make-or-buy decisions in industrial buyer–supplier relationships," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(4), pages 723-752, October.
    2. Holzmann, Patrick & Breitenecker, Robert J. & Schwarz, Erich J. & Gregori, Patrick, 2020. "Business model design for novel technologies in nascent industries: An investigation of 3D printing service providers," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    3. Lacroix, Rachel & Seifert, Ralf W. & Timonina-Farkas, Anna, 2021. "Benefiting from additive manufacturing for mass customization across the product life cycle," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 8(C).
    4. Sun, Mingyao & Ng, Chi To & Yang, Liu & Zhang, Tianhua, 2024. "Optimal after-sales service offering strategy: Additive manufacturing, traditional manufacturing, or hybrid?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    5. Robert B. Handfield & James Aitken & Neil Turner & Tillmann Boehme & Cecil Bozarth, 2022. "Assessing Adoption Factors for Additive Manufacturing: Insights from Case Studies," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-22, June.
    6. Davide Castellani & Fabio Lamperti & Katiuscia Lavoratori, 2022. "Measuring adoption of industry 4.0 technologies via international trade data: insights from European countries," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 49(1), pages 51-93, March.
    7. Altekin, F. Tevhide & Bukchin, Yossi, 2022. "A multi-objective optimization approach for exploring the cost and makespan trade-off in additive manufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(1), pages 235-253.
    8. Ayman Altuwaim & Abdulelah AlTasan & Abdulmohsen Almohsen, 2023. "Success Criteria for Applying Construction Technologies in Residential Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-15, April.
    9. Florinda Matos & Radu Godina & Celeste Jacinto & Helena Carvalho & Inês Ribeiro & Paulo Peças, 2019. "Additive Manufacturing: Exploring the Social Changes and Impacts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-18, July.
    10. Marić, Josip & Opazo-Basáez, Marco & Vlačić, Božidar & Dabić, Marina, 2023. "Innovation management of three-dimensional printing (3DP) technology: Disclosing insights from existing literature and determining future research streams," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    11. Turkcan, Hulya & Imamoglu, Salih Zeki & Ince, Huseyin, 2022. "To be more innovative and more competitive in dynamic environments: The role of additive manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    12. Arbabian, Mohammad E. & Wagner, Michael R., 2020. "The impact of 3D printing on manufacturer–retailer supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(2), pages 538-552.
    13. Na Liu & Pui-Sze Chow & Hongshan Zhao, 2020. "Challenges and critical successful factors for apparel mass customization operations: recent development and case study," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 291(1), pages 531-563, August.
    14. Nazanin Hosseini Arian & Alireza Pooya & Fariborz Rahimnia & Ali Sibevei, 2021. "Assessment the effect of rapid prototyping implementation on supply chain sustainability: a system dynamics approach," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 467-493, December.
    15. N. Knofius & M. C. Heijden & A. Sleptchenko & W. H. M. Zijm, 2021. "Improving effectiveness of spare parts supply by additive manufacturing as dual sourcing option," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 43(1), pages 189-221, March.
    16. Gedas Baranauskas & Agota Giedrė Raišienė & Renata Korsakienė, 2020. "Mapping the Scientific Research on Mass Customization Domain: A Critical Review and Bibliometric Analysis," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, September.
    17. Caviggioli, Federico & Ughetto, Elisa, 2019. "A bibliometric analysis of the research dealing with the impact of additive manufacturing on industry, business and society," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 254-268.
    18. Bram Westerweel & Rob Basten & Jelmar den Boer & Geert‐Jan van Houtum, 2021. "Printing Spare Parts at Remote Locations: Fulfilling the Promise of Additive Manufacturing," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(6), pages 1615-1632, June.
    19. Jaya Priyadarshini & Rajesh Kr Singh & Ruchi Mishra & Surajit Bag, 2022. "Investigating the interaction of factors for implementing additive manufacturing to build an antifragile supply chain: TISM-MICMAC approach," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 567-588, June.
    20. Li Chen & Yao Cui & Hau L. Lee, 2021. "Retailing with 3D Printing," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(7), pages 1986-2007, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5168-:d:1097322. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.