IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i10p3442-d172327.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Study of Supply Chain Risk in the Brazilian Wind Power Projects by Interpretive Structural Modeling and MICMAC Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Jorge Arnaldo Troche-Escobar

    (Postgraduate Program in Industrial Engineering (PEI), Federal University of Bahia (UFBA), Salvador (BA) 40210-630, Brazil)

  • Herman Augusto Lepikson

    (National Industrial Learning Service (SENAI-CIMATEC), Av. Orlando Gomes, 1845—Piatã, Salvador (BA) 41650-010, Brazil)

  • Francisco Gaudêncio Mendonça Freires

    (Polytechnic School, Federal University of Bahia (UFBA), Salvador (BA) 40210-630, Brazil)

Abstract

This paper aims to present an approach to the supply chain risk modeling of Brazilian wind power projects. Risk factors were assessed by literature review and analysis through the Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) and the Matrix-based Multiplication Applied to a Classification (MICMAC) methodologies, with a group of professionals of the field. The ISM model represented the relationships between twenty-two risk factors, and their position in the system, from higher to lower-level risks. The MICMAC analysis identified independent, autonomous, linkage and dependent risk factors according to their driving and dependence power. Data collected also allowed for the recognition of indirect influences between risk factors, complementing the system’s understanding, in special the strongest linkages. The paper also integrated both outputs to create a better representation of the risks factors into the system. The research characterizes current risk factors’ status on the Brazilian wind power supply chain, and the understanding of their implications into the system. It is a guide to implement effective mitigation strategies into the supply chain and more accurate and cautious decision-making in organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Jorge Arnaldo Troche-Escobar & Herman Augusto Lepikson & Francisco Gaudêncio Mendonça Freires, 2018. "A Study of Supply Chain Risk in the Brazilian Wind Power Projects by Interpretive Structural Modeling and MICMAC Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-24, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:10:p:3442-:d:172327
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/10/3442/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/10/3442/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Poulsen, Thomas & Lema, Rasmus, 2017. "Is the supply chain ready for the green transformation? The case of offshore wind logistics," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 758-771.
    2. Martins, Fernando Ramos & Pereira, Enio Bueno, 2011. "Enhancing information for solar and wind energy technology deployment in Brazil," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(7), pages 4378-4390, July.
    3. Pottmaier, D. & Melo, C.R. & Sartor, M.N. & Kuester, S. & Amadio, T.M. & Fernandes, C.A.H. & Marinha, D. & Alarcon, O.E., 2013. "The Brazilian energy matrix: From a materials science and engineering perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 678-691.
    4. Pereira de Lucena, André Frossard & Szklo, Alexandre Salem & Schaeffer, Roberto & Dutra, Ricardo Marques, 2010. "The vulnerability of wind power to climate change in Brazil," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 904-912.
    5. Jin, Xin & Zhang, Zhaolong & Shi, Xiaoqiang & Ju, Wenbin, 2014. "A review on wind power industry and corresponding insurance market in China: Current status and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 1069-1082.
    6. Frank Thomalla & Michael Boyland & Karlee Johnson & Jonathan Ensor & Heidi Tuhkanen & Åsa Gerger Swartling & Guoyi Han & John Forrester & Darin Wahl, 2018. "Transforming Development and Disaster Risk," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-12, May.
    7. Ren, Guorui & Liu, Jinfu & Wan, Jie & Guo, Yufeng & Yu, Daren, 2017. "Overview of wind power intermittency: Impacts, measurements, and mitigation solutions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 47-65.
    8. Pfohl, Hans-Christian & Gallus, Philipp & Thomas, David, 2011. "Interpretive structural modeling of supply chain risks," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 55230, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    9. Silva, Neilton Fidelis da & Rosa, Luiz Pinguelli & Freitas, Marcos Aurélio Vasconcelos & Pereira, Marcio Giannini, 2013. "Wind energy in Brazil: From the power sector's expansion crisis model to the favorable environment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 686-697.
    10. Shahbaz Khan & Abid Haleem & Mohd Imran Khan & Mustufa Haider Abidi & Abdulrahman Al-Ahmari, 2018. "Implementing Traceability Systems in Specific Supply Chain Management (SCM) through Critical Success Factors (CSFs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-26, January.
    11. Martha Carreño & Omar Cardona & Alex Barbat, 2007. "A disaster risk management performance index," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 41(1), pages 1-20, April.
    12. Teller, Juliane & Kock, Alexander & Gemünden, Hans Georg, 2014. "Risk Management in Project Protfolios is More than Managing Project Risks: A Contingency Perspective on Risk Management," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 76148, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    13. Schmidt, Johannes & Cancella, Rafael & Junior, Amaro Olímpio Pereira, 2016. "The effect of windpower on long-term variability of combined hydro-wind resources: The case of Brazil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 131-141.
    14. Chan Young Park & Seung Heon Han & Kang-Wook Lee & Yong Myoung Lee, 2017. "Analyzing Drivers of Conflict in Energy Infrastructure Projects: Empirical Case Study of Natural Gas Pipeline Sectors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-16, November.
    15. Gatzert, Nadine & Kosub, Thomas, 2016. "Risks and risk management of renewable energy projects: The case of onshore and offshore wind parks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 982-998.
    16. Montes, Germán Martínez & Martín, Enrique Prados, 2007. "Profitability of wind energy: Short-term risk factors and possible improvements," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 11(9), pages 2191-2200, December.
    17. Simas, Moana & Pacca, Sergio, 2014. "Assessing employment in renewable energy technologies: A case study for wind power in Brazil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 83-90.
    18. Lee, Hau L. & Whang, Seungjin, 2005. "Higher supply chain security with lower cost: Lessons from total quality management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(3), pages 289-300, June.
    19. Juárez, Alberto Aquino & Araújo, Alex Maurício & Rohatgi, Janardan Singh & de Oliveira Filho, Oyama Douglas Queiroz, 2014. "Development of the wind power in Brazil: Political, social and technical issues," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 828-834.
    20. Pfohl, Hans-Christian & Köhler, Holger & Thomas, David, 2010. "State of the art in supply chain risk management research. Empirical and conceptual findings and a roadmap for the implementation in practice," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 41981, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kiyoung Jeong & Jaeung Cha & Yulseong Kim, 2020. "SCRM Awareness in the Shipbuilding and Marine Equipment Market: Empirical Evidence from South Korea, China, and Singapore," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-16, June.
    2. Jelena Grujić & Slobodan Morača & Angela Fajsi, 2020. "Analysis of Risk Factors in the Channels of Drug Distribution: Professional Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-20, June.
    3. André Luiz Romano & Luís Miguel D. F. Ferreira & Sandra Sofia F. S. Caeiro, 2021. "Modelling Sustainability Risk in the Brazilian Cosmetics Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-26, December.
    4. Manel Elmsalmi & Wafik Hachicha & Awad M. Aljuaid, 2021. "Prioritization of the Best Sustainable Supply Chain Risk Management Practices Using a Structural Analysis Based-Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, April.
    5. Hassan Al-Zarooni & Hamdi Bashir, 0. "An integrated ISM fuzzy MICMAC approach for modeling and analyzing electrical power system network interdependencies," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 0, pages 1-23.
    6. Ali Sibevei & Adel Azar & Mostafa Zandieh & Seyed Mohammad Khalili & Maziar Yazdani, 2022. "Developing a Risk Reduction Support System for Health System in Iran: A Case Study in Blood Supply Chain Management," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-19, February.
    7. Hassan Al-Zarooni & Hamdi Bashir, 2020. "An integrated ISM fuzzy MICMAC approach for modeling and analyzing electrical power system network interdependencies," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 11(6), pages 1204-1226, December.
    8. Alexei Pérez-Velázquez & Leandro Leysdian Oro-Carralero & Jorge Laureano Moya-Rodríguez, 2020. "Supplier Selection for Photovoltaic Module Installation Utilizing Fuzzy Inference and the VIKOR Method: A Green Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-19, March.
    9. Anna Gazdecka & Joanna Sadlowska-Wrzesinska, 2021. "Identification of Key Psychosocial Safety Factors when Working Remotely: A Three-Step Research Methodology Proposal," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 5), pages 597-609.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Herrera, Milton M. & Dyner, Isaac & Cosenz, Federico, 2019. "Assessing the effect of transmission constraints on wind power expansion in northeast Brazil," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Juárez, Alberto Aquino & Araújo, Alex Maurício & Rohatgi, Janardan Singh & de Oliveira Filho, Oyama Douglas Queiroz, 2014. "Development of the wind power in Brazil: Political, social and technical issues," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 828-834.
    3. Vanderson Aparecido Delapedra-Silva & Paula Ferreira & Jorge Cunha & Herbert Kimura, 2021. "Economic Evaluation of Wind Power Projects in a Mix of Free and Regulated Market Environments in Brazil," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-18, June.
    4. Aquila, Giancarlo & Rotela Junior, Paulo & de Oliveira Pamplona, Edson & de Queiroz, Anderson Rodrigo, 2017. "Wind power feasibility analysis under uncertainty in the Brazilian electricity market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 127-136.
    5. Farkat Diógenes, Jamil Ramsi & Coelho Rodrigues, José & Farkat Diógenes, Maria Caroline & Claro, João, 2020. "Overcoming barriers to onshore wind farm implementation in Brazil," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    6. Frate, Claudio Albuquerque & Brannstrom, Christian, 2017. "Stakeholder subjectivities regarding barriers and drivers to the introduction of utility-scale solar photovoltaic power in Brazil," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 346-352.
    7. Rajiv Kumar Sharma, 2022. "Examining interaction among supplier selection strategies in an outsourcing environment using ISM and fuzzy logic approach," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(5), pages 2175-2194, October.
    8. Herrera, Milton M. & Dyner, Isaac & Cosenz, Federico, 2020. "Benefits from energy policy synchronisation of Brazil’s North-Northeast interconnection," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 427-437.
    9. Aquila, Giancarlo & Souza Rocha, Luiz Célio & Rotela Junior, Paulo & Saab Junior, Joseph Youssif & de Sá Brasil Lima, João & Balestrassi, Pedro Paulo, 2020. "Economic planning of wind farms from a NBI-RSM-DEA multiobjective programming," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 628-641.
    10. Gatzert, Nadine & Vogl, Nikolai, 2016. "Evaluating investments in renewable energy under policy risks," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 238-252.
    11. Sonja Simon & Tobias Naegler & Hans Christian Gils, 2018. "Transformation towards a Renewable Energy System in Brazil and Mexico—Technological and Structural Options for Latin America," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-26, April.
    12. Angelopoulos, Dimitrios & Doukas, Haris & Psarras, John & Stamtsis, Giorgos, 2017. "Risk-based analysis and policy implications for renewable energy investments in Greece," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 512-523.
    13. de Jong, Pieter & Kiperstok, Asher & Torres, Ednildo A., 2015. "Economic and environmental analysis of electricity generation technologies in Brazil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 725-739.
    14. Aquila, Giancarlo & Nakamura, Wilson Toshiro & Junior, Paulo Rotella & Souza Rocha, Luiz Celio & de Oliveira Pamplona, Edson, 2021. "Perspectives under uncertainties and risk in wind farms investments based on Omega-LCOE approach: An analysis in São Paulo state, Brazil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    15. Zurn, Hans H. & Tenfen, Daniel & Rolim, Jacqueline G. & Richter, André & Hauer, Ines, 2017. "Electrical energy demand efficiency efforts in Brazil, past, lessons learned, present and future: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 1081-1086.
    16. Ávila, Leandro & Mine, Miriam R.M & Kaviski, Eloy & Detzel, Daniel H.M., 2021. "Evaluation of hydro-wind complementarity in the medium-term planning of electrical power systems by joint simulation of periodic streamflow and wind speed time series: A Brazilian case study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 685-699.
    17. Aquila, Giancarlo & Pamplona, Edson de Oliveira & Queiroz, Anderson Rodrigo de & Rotela Junior, Paulo & Fonseca, Marcelo Nunes, 2017. "An overview of incentive policies for the expansion of renewable energy generation in electricity power systems and the Brazilian experience," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1090-1098.
    18. Mohamed, Emad & Seresht, Nima Gerami & Jafari, Parinaz & AbouRizk, Simaan, 2024. "Risk assessment for onshore wind projects in Canada," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    19. Viviescas, Cindy & Lima, Lucas & Diuana, Fabio A. & Vasquez, Eveline & Ludovique, Camila & Silva, Gabriela N. & Huback, Vanessa & Magalar, Leticia & Szklo, Alexandre & Lucena, André F.P. & Schaeffer, , 2019. "Contribution of Variable Renewable Energy to increase energy security in Latin America: Complementarity and climate change impacts on wind and solar resources," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    20. Zhou, Shan & Yang, Pu, 2020. "Risk management in distributed wind energy implementing Analytic Hierarchy Process," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 616-623.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:10:p:3442-:d:172327. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.