IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jstats/v7y2024i3p35-591d1419508.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparison of Limited Information Estimation Methods for the Two-Parameter Normal-Ogive Model with Locally Dependent Items

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander Robitzsch

    (IPN—Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education, Olshausenstraße 62, 24118 Kiel, Germany
    Centre for International Student Assessment (ZIB), Olshausenstraße 62, 24118 Kiel, Germany)

Abstract

The two-parameter normal-ogive (2PNO) model is one of the most popular item response theory (IRT) models for analyzing dichotomous items. Consistent parameter estimation of the 2PNO model using marginal maximum likelihood estimation relies on the local independence assumption. However, the assumption of local independence might be violated in practice. Likelihood-based estimation of the local dependence structure is often computationally demanding. Moreover, many IRT models that model local dependence do not have a marginal interpretation of item parameters. In this article, limited information estimation methods are reviewed that allow the convenient and straightforward handling of local dependence in estimating the 2PNO model. In detail, pairwise likelihood, weighted least squares, and normal-ogive harmonic analysis robust method (NOHARM) estimation are compared with marginal maximum likelihood estimation that ignores local dependence. A simulation study revealed that item parameters can be consistently estimated with limited information methods. At the same time, marginal maximum likelihood estimation resulted in biased item parameter estimates in the presence of local dependence. From a practical perspective, there were only minor differences regarding the statistical quality of item parameter estimates of the different estimation methods. Differences between the estimation methods are also compared for two empirical datasets.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander Robitzsch, 2024. "A Comparison of Limited Information Estimation Methods for the Two-Parameter Normal-Ogive Model with Locally Dependent Items," Stats, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-16, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jstats:v:7:y:2024:i:3:p:35-591:d:1419508
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/7/3/35/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/7/3/35/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steffen Fieuws & Geert Verbeke, 2006. "Pairwise Fitting of Mixed Models for the Joint Modeling of Multivariate Longitudinal Profiles," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(2), pages 424-431, June.
    2. Steffen Fieuws & Geert Verbeke & Filip Boen & Christophe Delecluse, 2006. "High dimensional multivariate mixed models for binary questionnaire data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 55(4), pages 449-460, August.
    3. Mark Wilson & Raymond Adams, 1995. "Rasch models for item bundles," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 60(2), pages 181-198, June.
    4. Katsikatsou, Myrsini & Moustaki, Irini & Yang-Wallentin, Fan & Jöreskog, Karl G., 2012. "Pairwise likelihood estimation for factor analysis models with ordinal data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(12), pages 4243-4258.
    5. R. Bock & Murray Aitkin, 1981. "Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: Application of an EM algorithm," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 46(4), pages 443-459, December.
    6. Victoria Savalei, 2006. "Logistic Approximation to the Normal: The KL Rationale," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 71(4), pages 763-767, December.
    7. Eric Bradlow & Howard Wainer & Xiaohui Wang, 1999. "A Bayesian random effects model for testlets," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 64(2), pages 153-168, June.
    8. Johan Braeken, 2011. "A Boundary Mixture Approach to Violations of Conditional Independence," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 76(1), pages 57-76, January.
    9. Albert Maydeu-Olivares, 2001. "Multidimensional Item Response Theory Modeling of Binary Data: Large Sample Properties of NOHARM Estimates," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 26(1), pages 51-71, March.
    10. Bengt Muthén & Albert Satorra, 1995. "Technical aspects of Muthén's liscomp approach to estimation of latent variable relations with a comprehensive measurement model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 60(4), pages 489-503, December.
    11. Brian Habing & Louis Roussos, 2003. "On the need for negative local item dependence," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 68(3), pages 435-451, September.
    12. Aristidis Nikoloulopoulos & Harry Joe, 2015. "Factor Copula Models for Item Response Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(1), pages 126-150, March.
    13. Yoshio Takane & Jan Leeuw, 1987. "On the relationship between item response theory and factor analysis of discretized variables," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 52(3), pages 393-408, September.
    14. Rosseel, Yves, 2012. "lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 48(i02).
    15. Johan Braeken & Francis Tuerlinckx & Paul Boeck, 2007. "Copula Functions for Residual Dependency," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 72(3), pages 393-411, September.
    16. Edward Ip, 2001. "Testing for local dependency in dichotomous and polytomous item response models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 66(1), pages 109-132, March.
    17. Anders Christoffersson, 1977. "Two-step weighted least squares factor analysis of dichotomized variables," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 42(3), pages 433-438, September.
    18. Renard, Didier & Molenberghs, Geert & Geys, Helena, 2004. "A pairwise likelihood approach to estimation in multilevel probit models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 649-667, January.
    19. Anders Christoffersson, 1975. "Factor analysis of dichotomized variables," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 40(1), pages 5-32, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jonas Moss & Steffen Grønneberg, 2023. "Partial Identification of Latent Correlations with Ordinal Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(1), pages 241-252, March.
    2. Minjeong Jeon & Sophia Rabe-Hesketh, 2016. "An autoregressive growth model for longitudinal item analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 81(3), pages 830-850, September.
    3. Michael Edwards, 2010. "A Markov Chain Monte Carlo Approach to Confirmatory Item Factor Analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 75(3), pages 474-497, September.
    4. Li Cai, 2010. "A Two-Tier Full-Information Item Factor Analysis Model with Applications," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 75(4), pages 581-612, December.
    5. Albert Maydeu-Olivares & Harry Joe, 2006. "Limited Information Goodness-of-fit Testing in Multidimensional Contingency Tables," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 71(4), pages 713-732, December.
    6. Sayed H. Kadhem & Aristidis K. Nikoloulopoulos, 2023. "Factor Tree Copula Models for Item Response Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(3), pages 776-802, September.
    7. Alexander Robitzsch, 2021. "A Comprehensive Simulation Study of Estimation Methods for the Rasch Model," Stats, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-23, October.
    8. Njål Foldnes & Steffen Grønneberg, 2019. "On Identification and Non-normal Simulation in Ordinal Covariance and Item Response Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 84(4), pages 1000-1017, December.
    9. Steffen Grønneberg & Jonas Moss & Njål Foldnes, 2020. "Partial Identification of Latent Correlations with Binary Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(4), pages 1028-1051, December.
    10. Yunxiao Chen & Xiaoou Li & Jingchen Liu & Zhiliang Ying, 2018. "Robust Measurement via A Fused Latent and Graphical Item Response Theory Model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 83(3), pages 538-562, September.
    11. Zachary F. Fisher & Kenneth A. Bollen, 2020. "An Instrumental Variable Estimator for Mixed Indicators: Analytic Derivatives and Alternative Parameterizations," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(3), pages 660-683, September.
    12. Papageorgiou, Ioulia & Moustaki, Irini, 2019. "Sampling of pairs in pairwise likelihood estimation for latent variable models with categorical observed variables," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 87592, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Dylan Molenaar, 2015. "Heteroscedastic Latent Trait Models for Dichotomous Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(3), pages 625-644, September.
    14. Ting Wang & Carolin Strobl & Achim Zeileis & Edgar C. Merkle, 2018. "Score-Based Tests of Differential Item Functioning via Pairwise Maximum Likelihood Estimation," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 83(1), pages 132-155, March.
    15. Myrsini Katsikatsou & Irini Moustaki, 2016. "Pairwise Likelihood Ratio Tests and Model Selection Criteria for Structural Equation Models with Ordinal Variables," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 81(4), pages 1046-1068, December.
    16. Mark Reiser, 1996. "Analysis of residuals for the multionmial item response model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 61(3), pages 509-528, September.
    17. Feddag, M.-L. & Bacci, S., 2009. "Pairwise likelihood for the longitudinal mixed Rasch model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 1027-1037, February.
    18. Nuo Xi & Michael W. Browne, 2014. "Contributions to the Underlying Bivariate Normal Method for Factor Analyzing Ordinal Data," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 39(6), pages 583-611, December.
    19. Cristiano Varin, 2008. "On composite marginal likelihoods," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 92(1), pages 1-28, February.
    20. Stefano Noventa & Andrea Spoto & Jürgen Heller & Augustin Kelava, 2019. "On a Generalization of Local Independence in Item Response Theory Based on Knowledge Space Theory," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 84(2), pages 395-421, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jstats:v:7:y:2024:i:3:p:35-591:d:1419508. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.