IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v11y2021i3p80-d594029.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Creating a Child-Friendly Environment: An Interpretation of Children’s Drawings from Planned Neighborhood Parks of Lucknow City

Author

Listed:
  • Mohit Kumar Agarwal

    (School of Architecture and Planning, BBD University, Lucknow 226028, India)

  • Vandana Sehgal

    (Faculty of Architecture and Planning, Dr. Abdul Kalam Technical University, Lucknow 226007, India)

  • Aurobindo Ogra

    (Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2028, South Africa)

Abstract

The urban environment is a product of many tangible and intangible factors for communities, involving activities, spaces, and users of different age groups. Stakeholder consultation has become an essential part of envisaging any urban space. In general practice, mostly adults’ opinions and suggestions are taken into account, and children are sidelined, even if the issues are related to children. Children are an integral part of the present urbanizing world and are some of its most sensitive and affected users. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child recognizes three P’s: provision, protection, and participation. The third, participation, is a crucial dimension of creating a healthier environment, but it has largely been neglected. The drawing technique is among the methods to gather information directly through the children’s participatory approach. It has been observed that children prefer to express themselves by drawing rather than answering questions and find it easy and enjoyable. This research incorporates drawing as a methodological tool for identifying children’s expectations and understanding their preferences about their ideal neighborhood park. A total of 80 children aged between 6 and 15 years from planned zones of Lucknow city were selected for the research. The results derived from the content and co-relation data analysis techniques highlight that children emphasized physical, perceptional, cognitive, emotional, and social parameters for developing a child-friendly environment in parks and open spaces.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohit Kumar Agarwal & Vandana Sehgal & Aurobindo Ogra, 2021. "Creating a Child-Friendly Environment: An Interpretation of Children’s Drawings from Planned Neighborhood Parks of Lucknow City," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-22, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:11:y:2021:i:3:p:80-:d:594029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/11/3/80/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/11/3/80/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sabirah Adams & Shazly Savahl & Maria Florence & Kyle Jackson, 2019. "Considering the Natural Environment in the Creation of Child-Friendly Cities: Implications for Children’s Subjective Well-Being," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 12(2), pages 545-567, April.
    2. Xabier Gainza, 2017. "Culture-led neighbourhood transformations beyond the revitalisation/gentrification dichotomy," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(4), pages 953-970, March.
    3. Mohit Kumar Agarwal & Vandana Sehgal & Aurobindo Ogra, 2021. "A Critical Review of Standards to Examine the Parameters of Child-Friendly Environment (CFE) in Parks and Open Space of Planned Neighborhoods: A Case of Lucknow City, India," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-24, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Basile Michel, 2023. "Theorizing the relations between cultural venues and territories: A metaphorical proposal based on anchoring, embeddedness and footprint [Théoriser les liens entre lieux culturels et territoires : ," Post-Print hal-04398647, HAL.
    2. Tetsuo Kidokoro & Ryo Fukuda & Kojiro Sho, 2022. "GENTRIFICATION IN TOKYO: Formation of the Tokyo West Creative Industry Cluster," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(6), pages 1055-1077, November.
    3. Borualogo, Ihsana Sabriani & Casas, Ferran, 2024. "Children with homeostatically maintained and homeostatically defeated subjective well-being in Indonesia," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    4. Mudoh Mbah & Anna Franz, 2021. "Revitalization and Branding of Rural Communities in Cameroon Using a Circular Approach for Sustainable Development—A Proposal for the Batibo Municipality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-26, June.
    5. David Orta, 2021. "“Mexicans Built This Neighborhood!” Gentrification, Organizations, and the Role of Place-Based Identity in Latinx Chicago," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    6. Soyoung Han & Cermetrius Lynell Bohannon & Yoonku Kwon, 2021. "Degentrification? Different Aspects of Gentrification before and after the COVID-19 Pandemic," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, November.
    7. Yunlong Niu & Mastura Adam & Hazreena Hussein, 2022. "Connecting Urban Green Spaces with Children: A Scientometric Analysis Using CiteSpace," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-23, August.
    8. Märit Jansson & Emma Herbert & Alva Zalar & Maria Johansson, 2022. "Child-Friendly Environments—What, How and by Whom?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-26, April.
    9. Lin Wang & Yuhang Cheng & Shan Jiang & Ziyao Zhou, 2023. "Neighborhood Quality and Subjective Well-being Among Children: A Moderated Mediation Model of Out-of-school Activities and Friendship Quality," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 16(4), pages 1607-1626, August.
    10. Phadiel Hoosen & Sabirah Adams & Habib Tiliouine & Shazly Savahl, 2022. "Youth and Adolescents’ Perceptions of Violence in Post-Apartheid South Africa: A Systematic Review of the Literature," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 15(3), pages 885-911, June.
    11. Kevin Simoes Loureiro & Alyssa Grecu & Frederick Moll & Andreas Hadjar, 2020. "Analyzing Drawings to Explore children’s Concepts of an Ideal School: Implications for the Improvement of children’s Well-Being at School," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 13(4), pages 1387-1411, August.
    12. Hadas Shadar & Dalit Shach-Pinsly, 2022. "From Public Housing to Private Housing: Neglect of Urban Qualities during the Urban Regeneration Process," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-17, June.
    13. Yuki Ninomiya & Mariko Matsumoto & Asuka Nomura & Lauri Kemppinen & Dandii Odgerel & Soili Keskinen & Esko Keskinen & Nergui Oyuntungalag & Hiroko Tsuboi & Nobuko Suzuki & Chie Hatagaki & Yutaka Fukui, 2021. "A Cross-Cultural Study of Happiness in Japanese, Finnish, and Mongolian Children: Analysis of the Sentence Completion Test," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 14(2), pages 871-896, April.
    14. Ghadiri, Mohaddese & Sarrafi, Mozaffar, 2022. "Integrating support groups, an effective approach to regenerate historic neighborhoods of Iran Case study: Oudlajan Neighborhood, Tehran," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    15. UnHyo Kim & Jeongwoo Lee & Sylvia Y. He, 2021. "Pedestrianization Impacts on Air Quality Perceptions and Environment Satisfaction: The Case of Regenerated Streets in Downtown Seoul," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-16, September.
    16. Yuan-Chieh Chang & Liang Feng, 2024. "Micro Foundation of Cultural and Creative Clusters: The Knowledge-based View," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 7723-7743, June.
    17. Margarida Rodrigues & Mário Franco, 2019. "Composite Index to Measure Cities’ Creative Performance: An Empirical Study in the Portuguese Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-21, February.
    18. Huiming Liu & Bin Li, 2021. "Changes of Spatial Characteristics: Socio-Cultural Sustainability in Historical Neighborhood in Beijing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-28, May.
    19. Le Zhang & Xiaoxiao Xu & Yanlong Guo, 2023. "The Impact of a Child-Friendly Design on Children’s Activities in Urban Community Pocket Parks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, June.
    20. Basile Michel, 2021. "Art, creativity, and tourism in creative quarters: trajectory and tensions of the cultural scene of the M50 art district in Shanghai [Arte, creatividad y turismo en los barrios creativos: trayector," Post-Print halshs-03365182, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:11:y:2021:i:3:p:80-:d:594029. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.