IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v11y2021i3p102-d617442.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Role Narrative of Disabled Artists and Both Their Work in General and in Relation to Science and Technology

Author

Listed:
  • Gregor Wolbring

    (Community Rehabilitation and Disability Studies, Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada)

  • Fatima Jamal Al-Deen

    (Community Rehabilitation and Disability Studies, Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada)

Abstract

Artists and the arts have many different roles in society. Artists also have various roles in relation to science and technology, ranging from being users of science and technology products to being educators for science and technologies, such as in museums. Artists are also involved in science and technology governance and ethics discussions. Disabled people are also artists and produce art, and disabled people in general and disabled artists are impacted by science and technology advancements. As such, disabled artists should also engage with science and technology, as well as contribute and influence science and technology governance, ethics discussions, and science and technology education with their work. We performed a scoping study of academic literature using the 70 databases of EBSCO-HOST and the database SCOPUS (includes Medline) to investigate the social role narrative of disabled artists and both their work in general and in relation to science and technology. Our findings suggest that disabled artists are mostly engaged in the context of becoming and being a disabled artist. Beyond the work itself, the identity issue of ‘being disabled’ was a focus of the coverage of being a disabled artist. The literature covered did not provide in-depth engagement with the social role of disabled artists, their work, and the barriers encountered, and best practices needed to fulfil the social roles found in the literature for non-disabled artists and the arts. Finally, the literature covered contained little content on the relationship of disabled artists and advancements of science and technology, such as in their role of using advancements of science and technologies for making art. No content at all was found that would link disabled artists and their work to the science and technology governance and ethics discussions, and no content linking disabled artists to being educators on science and technology issues, for example, in museums was found.

Suggested Citation

  • Gregor Wolbring & Fatima Jamal Al-Deen, 2021. "Social Role Narrative of Disabled Artists and Both Their Work in General and in Relation to Science and Technology," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-23, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:11:y:2021:i:3:p:102-:d:617442
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/11/3/102/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/11/3/102/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gregor Wolbring & Rachel Mackay & Theresa Rybchinski & Jacqueline Noga, 2013. "Disabled People and the Post-2015 Development Goal Agenda through a Disability Studies Lens," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(10), pages 1-31, September.
    2. Johannes Novy & Claire Colomb, 2013. "Struggling for the Right to the (Creative) City in Berlin and Hamburg: New Urban Social Movements, New ‘Spaces of Hope’?," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(5), pages 1816-1838, September.
    3. Rokhsaneh Rahbarianyazd & Naciye Doratli, 2017. "Assessing the contribution of cultural agglomeration in urban regeneration through developing cultural strategies," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(10), pages 1714-1733, October.
    4. Stuart Cameron & Jon Coaffee, 2005. "Art, Gentrification and Regeneration -- From Artist as Pioneer to Public Arts," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 39-58, April.
    5. Stuart Cameron & Jon Coaffee, 2005. "Art, Gentrification and Regeneration - From Artist as Pioneer to Public Arts," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 39-58.
    6. Manuel B. Aalbers & Magdalena Sabat, 2012. "Re-making a Landscape of Prostitution: the Amsterdam Red Light District," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1-2), pages 112-128, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shen, Tiyan & Yao, Xinyi & Wen, Fenghua, 2021. "The Urban Regeneration Engine Model: An analytical framework and case study of the renewal of old communities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    2. Velma Zahirovic-Herbert & Karen M Gibler, 2022. "The effect of film production studios on housing prices in Atlanta, the Hollywood of the South," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(4), pages 771-788, March.
    3. Bereitschaft, Bradley, 2020. "Gentrification and the evolution of commuting behavior within America's urban cores, 2000–2015," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    4. Pier Luigi Sacco & Guido Ferilli & Giorgio Tavano Blessi & Massimiliano Nuccio, 2013. "Culture as an Engine of Local Development Processes: System-Wide Cultural Districts II: Prototype Cases," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(4), pages 571-588, December.
    5. Stefano Bloch, 2016. "Why do Graffiti Writers Write on Murals? The Birth, Life, and Slow Death of Freeway Murals in Los Angeles," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 451-471, March.
    6. Jan Suchacek, 2019. "The Benefit of Failure: On the Development of Ostrava’s Culture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-15, May.
    7. Heather E. McLean, 2014. "Cracks in the Creative City: The Contradictions of Community Arts Practice," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(6), pages 2156-2173, November.
    8. Roberta Comunian & Alessandra Faggian, 2011. "Higher Education and the Creative City," Chapters, in: David Emanuel Andersson & Åke E. Andersson & Charlotta Mellander (ed.), Handbook of Creative Cities, chapter 10, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Vanessa Mathews, 2014. "Incoherence and Tension in Culture-Led Redevelopment," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 1019-1036, May.
    10. Thomas Sigler & David Wachsmuth, 2020. "New directions in transnational gentrification: Tourism-led, state-led and lifestyle-led urban transformations," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(15), pages 3190-3201, November.
    11. David J. Madden, 2014. "Neighborhood as Spatial Project: Making the Urban Order on the Downtown Brooklyn Waterfront," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 471-497, March.
    12. Harvey Molotch & Mark Treskon, 2009. "Changing Art: SoHo, Chelsea and the Dynamic Geography of Galleries in New York City," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 517-541, June.
    13. Carl Grodach & Nicole Foster & James Murdoch, 2018. "Gentrification, displacement and the arts: Untangling the relationship between arts industries and place change," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(4), pages 807-825, March.
    14. Meghan Ashlin Rich & William Tsitsos, 2016. "Avoiding the ‘SoHo Effect’ in Baltimore: Neighborhood Revitalization and Arts and Entertainment Districts," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(4), pages 736-756, July.
    15. Arnoud Lagendijk & Rianne Melik & Freek Haan & Huib Ernste & Huub Ploegmakers & Serap Kayasu, 2014. "Comparative Approaches to Gentrification: A Research Framework," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 105(3), pages 358-365, July.
    16. Loretta Lees & David Ley, 2008. "Introduction to Special Issue on Gentrification and Public Policy," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(12), pages 2379-2384, November.
    17. Emil van Eck & Iris Hagemans & Jan Rath, 2020. "The ambiguity of diversity: Management of ethnic and class transitions in a gentrifying local shopping street," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(16), pages 3299-3314, December.
    18. Kasey Zapatka & Brenden Beck, 2021. "Does demand lead supply? Gentrifiers and developers in the sequence of gentrification, New York City 2009–2016," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(11), pages 2348-2368, August.
    19. Fabiana Forte & Pierfrancesco De Paola, 2019. "How Can Street Art Have Economic Value?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-11, January.
    20. Xabier Gainza, 2017. "Culture-led neighbourhood transformations beyond the revitalisation/gentrification dichotomy," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(4), pages 953-970, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:11:y:2021:i:3:p:102-:d:617442. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.