IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v9y2020i5p70-d354580.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Potential of Networks for Families in the Child Protection System: A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Pérez-Hernando

    (Department of Methods of Research and Diagnosis in Education, Faculty of Education, University of Barcelona, Pg de la Vall d’Hebron, 171, 08035 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Nuria Fuentes-Peláez

    (Department of Methods of Research and Diagnosis in Education, Faculty of Education, University of Barcelona, Pg de la Vall d’Hebron, 171, 08035 Barcelona, Spain)

Abstract

There has recently been increased interest in the potential for formal and informal networks to aid interventions with biologic families in helping them achieve reunification in the context of the child protection system. When group support is provided to families, the creation of a network of social support seems to be a consequence. The article analyzes the conceptualization of social support in order to create social support networks and the benefits on the intervention with families in the framework of the child protection system through a systematic review. From a wide search 4348 documents, finally 14 articles were included in the reviews. Results show that social support is considered a process by which social resources are provided from formal (professional services and programs associated with those services in any off the protection, health of educational systems) and informal (extended family, friends, neighbors and acquaintances) networks, allowing the families to confront daily moments as well as in crisis situations. This social support is related to emotional, psychological, physical, instrumental, material and information support that allow families to face their difficulties. Formal and informal networks of child protection systems contribute to social support, resilience, consolidation of learning and the assistance of families to social intervention programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Pérez-Hernando & Nuria Fuentes-Peláez, 2020. "The Potential of Networks for Families in the Child Protection System: A Systematic Review," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-16, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:9:y:2020:i:5:p:70-:d:354580
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/9/5/70/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/9/5/70/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chambers, Ruth M. & Crutchfield, Rashida M. & Goddu Harper, Stephanie G. & Fatemi, Maryam & Rodriguez, Angel Y., 2018. "Family reunification in child welfare practice: A pilot study of parent and staff experiences," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 221-231.
    2. Ying‐Shun Wei & Hsin Chu & Chiung‐Hua Chen & Yu‐Jung Hsueh & Yu‐Shiun Chang & Lu‐I Chang & Kuei‐Ru Chou, 2012. "Support groups for caregivers of intellectually disabled family members: effects on physical–psychological health and social support," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(11‐12), pages 1666-1677, June.
    3. Karjalainen, Piia & Kiviruusu, Olli & Aronen, Eeva T. & Santalahti, Päivi, 2019. "Group-based parenting program to improve parenting and children's behavioral problems in families using special services: A randomized controlled trial in a real-life setting," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 420-429.
    4. Rodrigo, Maria Jose & Martin, Juan Carlos & Maiquez, Maria Luisa & Rodriguez, Guacimara, 2007. "Informal and formal supports and maternal child-rearing practices in at-risk and non at-risk psychosocial contexts," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 329-347, March.
    5. Balsells, Maria Àngels & Pastor, Crescencia & Mateos, Ainoa & Vaquero, Eduard & Urrea, Aida, 2015. "Exploring the needs of parents for achieving reunification: The views of foster children, birth family and social workers in Spain," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 159-166.
    6. Elizabeth Fernandez, 2014. "Child Protection and Vulnerable Families: Trends and Issues in the Australian Context," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-24, October.
    7. Byrne, Sonia & Rodrigo, María José & Martín, Juan Carlos, 2012. "Influence of form and timing of social support on parental outcomes of a child-maltreatment prevention program," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(12), pages 2495-2503.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Balsells, Maria Àngels & Pastor, Crescencia & Mateos, Ainoa & Vaquero, Eduard & Urrea, Aida, 2015. "Exploring the needs of parents for achieving reunification: The views of foster children, birth family and social workers in Spain," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 159-166.
    2. Jedwab, Merav & Shaw, Terry V., 2017. "Predictors of reentry into the foster care system: Comparison of children with and without previous removal experience," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 177-184.
    3. Sorek, Yoa & Szabo-Lael, Rachel & Almog-Zaken, Aya, 2024. "“Welfare used to mean darkness – Now it’s beaming with light”: Professionals and parents’ perceptions of a family preservation program in Israel," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    4. Diana N. Teixeira & Isabel Narciso & Margarida R. Henriques, 2022. "Driving for Success in Family Reunification—Professionals’ Views on Intervention," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Healy, Karen & Venables, Jemma & Povey, Jenny & Baxter, Janeen & Scull, Sue & Thompson, Kate & Boman, Madonna, 2024. "The emotional terrain of foster and kinship carers’ relationships with parents of children in care: Carers’ perspectives," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    6. Rissanen, Elisa & Karjalainen, Piia & Kiviruusu, Olli & Kankaanpää, Eila & Aronen, Eeva T. & Haula, Taru & Sääksvuori, Lauri & Vornanen, Riitta & Linnosmaa, Ismo, 2024. "Cost-effectiveness of a parenting program to reduce children’s behavioral problems among families receiving child protection services and other family support services – A randomized controlled trial," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    7. Middel, Floor & López López, Mónica & Fluke, John & Witte, Susanne & Biehal, Nina & Grietens, Hans, 2024. "Who is involved in child protection investigations? The relationship between gender, ethnicity/migration background, and contacts between parents and caseworkers during investigations and assessments," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    8. Vanderfaeillie, Johan & Borms, Dorien & Teunissen, M.S.L. & Gypen, Laura & Van Holen, Frank, 2023. "Reasons used by Flemish foster care workers in family reunification decision making," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    9. Bai, Rong & Collins, Cyleste & Fischer, Robert & Crampton, David, 2020. "Family critical time intervention with housing unstable, child welfare-involved families: Service providers’ and families’ experiences with the phases," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    10. Kor, Kenny & Fernandez, Elizabeth & Spangaro, Jo, 2021. "Practitioners’ experience of implementing therapeutic residential care: A multi-perspective study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    11. Byrne, Sonia & Rodrigo, María José & Martín, Juan Carlos, 2012. "Influence of form and timing of social support on parental outcomes of a child-maltreatment prevention program," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(12), pages 2495-2503.
    12. Dare, Julie & Wilkinson, Celia & Karthigesu, Shantha P. & Coall, David A. & Marquis, Ruth, 2023. "Keeping the family: A socio-ecological perspective on the challenges of child removal and reunification for mothers who have experienced substance-related harms," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    13. Balsells, M. Ángeles & Fuentes-Peláez, Nuria & Pastor, Crescencia, 2017. "Listening to the voices of children in decision-making: A challenge for the child protection system in Spain," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 418-425.
    14. Nogueira, Sandra & Abreu-Lima, Isabel & Canário, Catarina & Cruz, Orlanda, 2021. "Group Triple P – A randomized controlled trial with low-income mothers," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    15. M. Angeles Balsells & Crescencia Pastor & Pere Amorós & Ainoa Mateos & Carmen Ponce & Alicia Navajas, 2014. "Child Welfare and Successful Reunification through the Socio-Educative Process: Training Needs among Biological Families in Spain," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-18, October.
    16. LaBrenz, Catherine A. & Lloyd Sieger, Margaret & Choi, Mijin & Harrell, Danielle R. & Findley, Erin & Robinson, Erica D. & Baiden, Philip, 2023. "Family support services and reunification across diverse racial/ethnic groups: A survival analysis utilizing administrative child welfare data," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    17. Ayón, Cecilia, 2011. "Latino families and the public child welfare system: Examining the role of social support networks," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(10), pages 2061-2066, October.
    18. Bai, Rong & Collins, Cyleste & Fischer, Robert & Crampton, David, 2023. "Facilitators and barriers to reunification among housing unstable families," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    19. Álvarez, Míriam & Byrne, Sonia & Rodrigo, María José, 2021. "Social support dimensions predict parental outcomes in a Spanish early intervention program for positive parenting," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    20. Ayala Nunes, Lara & Nunes, Cristina & Lemos, Ida, 2014. "Parenting Alliance Among Mothers Of Psychosocially At-Risk Families," Spatial and Organizational Dynamics Discussion Papers 2014-2, CIEO-Research Centre for Spatial and Organizational Dynamics, University of Algarve.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:9:y:2020:i:5:p:70-:d:354580. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.