IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v161y2024ics0190740924002445.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The emotional terrain of foster and kinship carers’ relationships with parents of children in care: Carers’ perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Healy, Karen
  • Venables, Jemma
  • Povey, Jenny
  • Baxter, Janeen
  • Scull, Sue
  • Thompson, Kate
  • Boman, Madonna

Abstract

Children in foster and kinship care have a right to relationships with their parents. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) asserts children’s right to contact with their parents and families during periods of separation, except where this is proven not to be in the child’s best interests. Foster and kinship carers can play a pivotal role in children’s opportunities for, and experiences of, connection to parents and other family. Yet, the relationship between carers and parents is often characterised by ambivalence and tensions. Emerging research suggests that training and support to carers can help them to navigate their own and children’s relationships with their families. However, such support is not routinely available, and the evidence-base for supporting carers to manage complex relationships with parents is not well-developed. In this paper, we report on a study with 113 foster and kinship carers in Queensland (Australia). We explore carers’ perceptions of the emotional aspects of their relationships with parents. A novel feature of our study is our exploration of carers’ perceptions of affiliative and threat-based emotions in their relationships with birth parents. We report that carers experience a wide spectrum of emotions in their relationships with parents, some of which strengthen these relationships while others create distance. We find also that carers receive little, if any, formal support in building relationships with parents and for supporting children’s opportunities for, and experiences of family contact. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander carers report being unsupported in meeting their cultural obligations in developing relationships with children’s parents and families. We discuss the implications for formal support to improve carers capacities to build and maintain their own, and children’s, relationships with parents.

Suggested Citation

  • Healy, Karen & Venables, Jemma & Povey, Jenny & Baxter, Janeen & Scull, Sue & Thompson, Kate & Boman, Madonna, 2024. "The emotional terrain of foster and kinship carers’ relationships with parents of children in care: Carers’ perspectives," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:161:y:2024:i:c:s0190740924002445
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.107672
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740924002445
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.107672?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. McWey, Lenore M. & Cui, Ming, 2021. "More contact with biological parents predicts shorter length of time in out of home care and mental health of youth in the child welfare system," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    2. Riggs, Damien W., 2021. "Experiences of vicarious trauma among Australian foster parents providing long-term care to non-indigenous children," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    3. Ruiz-Romero, Kevin J. & Salas, María D. & Fernández-Baena, Francisco Javier & González-Pasarín, Lucía, 2022. "Is contact with birth parents beneficial to children in non-kinship foster care? A scoping review of the evidence," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    4. Elizabeth Fernandez, 2014. "Child Protection and Vulnerable Families: Trends and Issues in the Australian Context," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-24, October.
    5. Claire Mason & Danny Taggart & Karen Broadhurst, 2020. "Parental Non-Engagement within Child Protection Services—How Can Understandings of Complex Trauma and Epistemic Trust Help?," Societies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-21, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gerdts-Andresen, Tina & Valen-Sendstad Andersen, Marie & Aarum Hansen, Heidi, 2024. "The child’s right to family life when living in public care: how to facilitate contact that preserves, strengthens, and develops family ties," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    2. Gable, Sara & Holliday, Amelia & Zars, Jonathon & Simelus, Sonita & Nickell, Angela & Anderson, Bradd, 2024. "Intergenerational conflict, contact with biological parents, and child functioning in kinship caregiver families," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    3. Donata Petružytė & Violeta Gevorgianienė & Jūratė Charenkova & Miroslavas Seniutis & Laimutė Žalimienė & Eglė Šumskienė & Lijana Gvaldaitė, 2021. "Manifestations and Preconditions of Child Rights Protection—Specialists’ Aggression towards Caregivers and Child in the Situation of Child Removal from the Family," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-19, October.
    4. Kor, Kenny & Fernandez, Elizabeth & Spangaro, Jo, 2021. "Practitioners’ experience of implementing therapeutic residential care: A multi-perspective study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    5. Davies, Kate & Ross, Nicola & Cocks, Jessica & Foote, Wendy, 2023. "Family inclusion in child protection: Knowledge, power and resistance," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    6. Zilberstein, Karen, 2023. "Every state for itself: A comparison of states’ visitation guidelines with research studies," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    7. Ruiz-Romero, Kevin J. & Salas, María D. & Fernández-Baena, Francisco Javier & González-Pasarín, Lucía, 2022. "Is contact with birth parents beneficial to children in non-kinship foster care? A scoping review of the evidence," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    8. Danner Touati, Camille & Miljkovitch, Raphaële & Elina Sirparanta, Aino & Ahmad, Sam & Toléon, Camille & Deborde, Anne-Sophie, 2023. "Suicidal risk among adult survivors of childhood maltreatment: The role of parent–child contact during out of home placement," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    9. Sara Pérez-Hernando & Nuria Fuentes-Peláez, 2020. "The Potential of Networks for Families in the Child Protection System: A Systematic Review," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-16, May.
    10. Healy, Karen & Venables, Jemma & Walsh, Tamara, 2023. "Supporting birth parents’ relationships with children following removal: A scoping review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    11. Andrea Rácz & Dorottya Sik, 2020. "Social (Im)Mobility and Social Work with Families with Children. Case Study of a Disadvantaged Microregion in Hungary," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-12, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:161:y:2024:i:c:s0190740924002445. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.