IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v8y2019i6p183-d238940.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Community Planning Perspective and Its Role within the Social Policy of the Municipalities

Author

Listed:
  • Ivana Butoracova Sindleryova

    (University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Bucianska 4/A, Trnava 91701, Slovakia)

  • Michal Garaj

    (University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Bucianska 4/A, Trnava 91701, Slovakia)

  • Lucia Dancisinova

    (Faculty of Management, Presov University, Konstantinova 16, Presov 08001, Slovakia)

Abstract

Community planning solves policy making at different levels of the state’s functioning. Each case has a specific aim and reflects the requirements of citizens. The structure of aims is adjusted to collective and individual levels of clarification of the effect on maximization of potential applications of community planning. The research was realized in the perspective of the municipalities of the Slovak Republic. We used a participatory model of community planning policy as a main tool of community planning potential detection. We emphasized the specific adjustment of community planning to social policy in the Slovak Republic. Data collection was realized by the quantitative research method of a questionnaire. The data were evaluated by a correlation analysis to identify the measure of relationship between variables. Cross-Tabs were used for description of observed categories representation. The results showed a positive effect of the public sector on maximization of community planning policy. On the other hand, the potential declined with rising involvement of the public sector. Individual approach of leading researchers had minimum or no effect on success. It is a collective perspective that decides. In confrontation with the current state, the research represents a unique approach and confirms the exceptionality of the issue. It identifies with the previous findings about a positive contribution of the public participation in community planning. The public perceives the problems critically, expresses the requirements and needs, proposes different solutions and represents important human capital. Additionally, it can make use of contacts and multiply the use of local resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Ivana Butoracova Sindleryova & Michal Garaj & Lucia Dancisinova, 2019. "Community Planning Perspective and Its Role within the Social Policy of the Municipalities," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-17, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:8:y:2019:i:6:p:183-:d:238940
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/8/6/183/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/8/6/183/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Laurie Pearce, 2003. "Disaster Management and Community Planning, and Public Participation: How to Achieve Sustainable Hazard Mitigation," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 28(2), pages 211-228, March.
    2. Peter J. May, 1993. "Mandate design and implementation: Enhancing implementation efforts and shaping regulatory styles," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 12(4), pages 634-663.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shibly Shahrier & Koji Kotani, 2016. "Labor Donation Or Money Donation? Pro-Sociality On Prevention Of Natural Disasters In A Case Of Cyclone Aila, Bangladesh," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 61(01), pages 1-26, March.
    2. Heather Rosoff & Robert Siko & Richard John & William J. Burns, 2013. "Should I stay or should I go? An experimental study of health and economic government policies following a severe biological agent release," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 121-137, March.
    3. Faith Bradley & William D. Schreckhise & Daniel E. Chand, 2017. "Explaining States’ Responses to the REAL ID Act: the Role of Resources, Political Environment, and Implementor Attitudes in Complying with a Federal Mandate," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 8(3), pages 877-897, September.
    4. Pankaj Jaiswal & Cees Westen, 2013. "Use of quantitative landslide hazard and risk information for local disaster risk reduction along a transportation corridor: a case study from Nilgiri district, India," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 65(1), pages 887-913, January.
    5. Manuel Fernández-García & Clemente J. Navarro & Irene Gómez-Ramirez, 2021. "Evaluating Territorial Targets of European Integrated Urban Policy. The URBAN and URBANA Initiatives in Spain (1994–2013)," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, September.
    6. Jorge León & Alan March, 2016. "An urban form response to disaster vulnerability: Improving tsunami evacuation in Iquique, Chile," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 43(5), pages 826-847, September.
    7. Lee, R. W. & Rivasplata, C. R., 2001. "Metropolitan transportation planning in the 1990s: comparisons and contrasts in New Zealand, Chile and California," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 47-61, January.
    8. Yi Lixin & Cheng Ke & Cao Xiaoying & Sun Yueling & Cheng Xiaoqing & He Ye, 2017. "Analysis of social vulnerability of residential community to hazards in Tianjin, China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 87(2), pages 1223-1243, June.
    9. Camilo Gomez & Andrés D. González & Hiba Baroud & Claudia D. Bedoya‐Motta, 2019. "Integrating Operational and Organizational Aspects in Interdependent Infrastructure Network Recovery," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(9), pages 1913-1929, September.
    10. A. Lara & X. Garcia & F. Bucci & A. Ribas, 2017. "What do people think about the flood risk? An experience with the residents of Talcahuano city, Chile," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 85(3), pages 1557-1575, February.
    11. Anna Scolobig & Michael Thompson & JoAnne Linnerooth-Bayer, 2016. "Compromise not consensus: designing a participatory process for landslide risk mitigation," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 81(1), pages 45-68, April.
    12. Md. Mashrur Rahman & Uttama Barua & Farzana Khatun & Ishrat Islam & Rezwana Rafiq, 2018. "Participatory Vulnerability Reduction (PVR): an urban community-based approach for earthquake management," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 93(3), pages 1479-1505, September.
    13. Zewen Hu & Xiaocai Zhang & Jingjing Cui & Lijie Zhang & Wasim Ahmed, 2021. "A survey-based analysis of the public’s willingness for disaster relief in China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 107(3), pages 2205-2225, July.
    14. Lisa Dilling & Elise Pizzi & John Berggren & Ashwin Ravikumar & Krister Andersson, 2017. "Drivers of adaptation: Responses to weather- and climate-related hazards in 60 local governments in the Intermountain Western U.S," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(11), pages 2628-2648, November.
    15. Becken, Susanne & Hughey, Kennet F.D., 2013. "Linking tourism into emergency management structures to enhance disaster risk reduction," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 77-85.
    16. Jacopo Panerati & Nicolas Schwind & Stefan Zeltner & Katsumi Inoue & Giovanni Beltrame, 2018. "Assessing the resilience of stochastic dynamic systems under partial observability," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-21, August.
    17. Emadul Islam & Haris Bin Abd Wahab & Odessa Gonzalez Benson, 2022. "Community Participation in Disaster Recovery Programs: A Study of a Coastal Area in Bangladesh," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 34(5), pages 2438-2462, October.
    18. Tolulope O. Odimayomi & Caitlin R. Proctor & Qi Erica Wang & Arman Sabbaghi & Kimberly S. Peterson & David J. Yu & Juneseok Lee & Amisha D. Shah & Christian J. Ley & Yoorae Noh & Charlotte D. Smith & , 2021. "Water safety attitudes, risk perception, experiences, and education for households impacted by the 2018 Camp Fire, California," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 108(1), pages 947-975, August.
    19. Tracey L. O’Sullivan & Karen P. Phillips, 2019. "From SARS to pandemic influenza: the framing of high-risk populations," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 98(1), pages 103-117, August.
    20. Dinh Tuan Hai & Nguyen Kim Hoang, 2023. "Evaluating the Stakeholders’ Satisfaction with Design and Construction of Resilient Houses in Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:8:y:2019:i:6:p:183-:d:238940. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.