IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v7y2018i11p231-d182031.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Parental Mediation Moderate the Longitudinal Association among Bystanders and Perpetrators and Victims of Cyberbullying?

Author

Listed:
  • Michelle F. Wright

    (Department of Psychology, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
    Institute for Research on Children, Youth, and Family, Masaryk University, 60200 Brno, the Czech Republic)

  • Sebastian Wachs

    (Department of Education, University of Potsdam, 14476 Potsdam, Germany)

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to examine the moderation of parental mediation in the longitudinal association between being a bystander of cyberbullying and cyberbullying perpetration and cyberbullying victimization. Participants were 1067 7th and 8th graders between 12 and 15 years old (51% female) from six middle schools in predominantly middle-class neighborhoods in the Midwestern United States. Increases in being bystanders of cyberbullying was related positively to restrictive and instructive parental mediation. Restrictive parental mediation was related positively to Time 2 (T2) cyberbullying victimization, while instructive parental mediation was negatively related to T2 cyberbullying perpetration and victimization. Restrictive parental mediation was a moderator in the association between bystanders of cyberbullying and T2 cyberbullying victimization. Increases in restrictive parental mediation strengthened the positive relationship between these variables. In addition, instructive mediation moderated the association between bystanders of cyberbullying and T2 cyberbullying victimization such that increases in this form of parental mediation strategy weakened the association between bystanders of cyberbullying and T2 cyberbullying victimization. The current findings indicate a need for parents to be aware of how they can impact adolescents’ involvement in cyberbullying as bullies and victims. In addition, greater attention should be given to developing parental intervention programs that focus on the role of parents in helping to mitigate adolescents’ likelihood of cyberbullying involvement.

Suggested Citation

  • Michelle F. Wright & Sebastian Wachs, 2018. "Does Parental Mediation Moderate the Longitudinal Association among Bystanders and Perpetrators and Victims of Cyberbullying?," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-10, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:7:y:2018:i:11:p:231-:d:182031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/7/11/231/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/7/11/231/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sebastian Wachs & Marianne Junger & Ruthaychonee Sittichai, 2015. "Traditional, Cyber and Combined Bullying Roles: Differences in Risky Online and Offline Activities," Societies, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-27, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sebastian Wachs & Michelle F. Wright & Ruthaychonnee Sittichai & Ritu Singh & Ramakrishna Biswal & Eun-mee Kim & Soeun Yang & Manuel Gámez-Guadix & Carmen Almendros & Katerina Flora & Vassiliki Daskal, 2019. "Associations between Witnessing and Perpetrating Online Hate in Eight Countries: The Buffering Effects of Problem-Focused Coping," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-13, October.
    2. Seung-ha Lee & Hyun-jung Ju, 2019. "Mothers’ Difficulties and Expectations for Intervention of Bullying among Young Children in South Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-24, March.
    3. Shuaa A. Aljasir & Maisoon O. Alsebaei, 2022. "Cyberbullying and cybervictimization on digital media platforms: the role of demographic variables and parental mediation strategies," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-9, December.
    4. José Gómez-Galán & Cristina Lázaro-Pérez & José Ángel Martínez-López, 2021. "Trajectories of Victimization and Bullying at University: Prevention for a Healthy and Sustainable Educational Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-16, March.
    5. Iyus Yosep & Rohman Hikmat & Ai Mardhiyah, 2023. "Preventing Cyberbullying and Reducing Its Negative Impact on Students Using E-Parenting: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-14, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Escario, José-Julián & Rodriguez-Sanchez, Carla & Sancho-Esper, Franco & Barlés-Arizón, María-José, 2023. "A quantitative analysis of factors related to adolescent cybervictimization in Spain: A multilevel logistic regression approach," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    2. Efrati, Yaniv & Amichai-Hamburger, Yair, 2020. "Are adolescents who consume pornography different from those who engaged in online sexual activities?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    3. Michelle F. Wright & Sebastian Wachs, 2023. "Cyberbullying Involvement and Depression among Elementary School, Middle School, High School, and University Students: The Role of Social Support and Gender," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-15, February.
    4. Michelle F. Wright & Sebastian Wachs, 2019. "Does Parental Mediation of Technology Use Moderate the Associations between Cyber Aggression Involvement and Substance Use? A Three-Year Longitudinal Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-13, July.
    5. Inmaculada Méndez & Ana Belén Jorquera & Cecilia Ruiz Esteban & José Manuel García-Fernández, 2020. "Profiles of Mobile Phone Use, Cyberbullying, and Emotional Intelligence in Adolescents," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-10, November.
    6. Sebastian Wachs & Ludwig Bilz & Saskia M. Fischer & Michelle F. Wright, 2017. "Do Emotional Components of Alexithymia Mediate the Interplay between Cyberbullying Victimization and Perpetration?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-11, December.
    7. Michelle F. Wright & Sebastian Wachs, 2020. "Adolescents’ Cyber Victimization: The Influence of Technologies, Gender, and Gender Stereotype Traits," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-11, February.
    8. Sebastian Wachs & Michelle F. Wright & Manuel Gámez-Guadix & Nicola Döring, 2021. "How Are Consensual, Non-Consensual, and Pressured Sexting Linked to Depression and Self-Harm? The Moderating Effects of Demographic Variables," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-16, March.
    9. Inmaculada Méndez & Ana Belén Jorquera & Cecilia Ruiz Esteban & José Manuel García-Fernández, 2020. "Profiles of Problematic Internet Use in Bullying and Cyberbullying among Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-11, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:7:y:2018:i:11:p:231-:d:182031. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.